herme3

Anything that disagrees with The Bible can't be compatible with the Christian religion.

Ok, so there were half-man and half-monkey creatures between the monkeys and humans. It is still the same basic concept. Your version of evolution doesn't say man was created from dust.

I'm sorry if this bothers you. I have read The Bible, and I really don't think Catholics follow the Christian faith correctly. They make up stuff, like the Earth is flat, and claim it is part of the Christian faith. They are always harming the reputation of Christians. When people say Christians are "fundamentalists" it is normally because of something the Catholics said. I'm not Catholic, and I'm tired of people saying stuff like, "Christians once believed the Earth was flat, the Earth was the only planet, and the stars went around the Earth." This was created by the Catholics. There are actually pages in The Bible that explain how the Earth is round. I have not found any parts of The Bible that disagree with anything that has been scientifically proven.

There are multiple definitions to the term, "evolution". Evolution that involves small changes in the DNA caused by natural selection is proven. This is compatible with creationism. However, many people think that humans evolved from monkeys, which evolved from simpler forms of life, which evolved from one cell, which evolved from amino acids. This is where creationism and evolution are not compatible. The Bible says that God created man from dust. It says that he created animals, fish, birds, and other wildlife separately. The theory that men evolved from animals is incompatible with creationism. I believe that there are changes within DNA from different generations. I also believe in natural selection. Some characteristics of animals and humans have probably changed a lot. However, I do not believe that humans evolved from animals, or that animals evolved from amino acids.

I think Vista is a good name. It is creative. Longhorn just sounded retarded. From what I've heard, Vista is going to be a lot different than xp. What type of processor does it have? Mine is a Compaq Presario X1000 with a Pentium M processor. It isn't anywhere near being able to burn anyone. The fan doesn't even come on unless I'm running an application that require a lot of processing. For example, a virus scanner or 3D game. Everyone that I consider cool (Bill Gates ) uses Windows. Also, every person that I know in real life uses Windows. The only people that I know use Linux are all people in forums and chat rooms. Many of those people are always complaining because they can't get their programs to work with Linux.

I deny that. Christianity started while Jesus was still alive. He had a large number of supporters and they were the first Christians. Your version of evolution is in conflict with The Bible because The Bible says man was created from dust by God. The Bible says that all the animals, fish, etc. were created separately. Your version of evolution says that man evolved from these animals, and was not created separately.

The fan seems to be working fine. All the warm air is being taken out of the computer. That computer has always made the room hot. That news article is crazy. The heat from a laptop can't be as bad as taking a warm bath. People have been taking warm baths for years, and never had any problems.

It is a tft monitor. It is a laptop, so everything is connected. My laptop really doesn't get very hot. It feels a little warm, but not any warmer than most electrical appliances. I have a desktop computer that was made in 1999. If I leave that computer on for about an hour, the entire room will feel hot.

Mine already does that. I've never actually timed it, but it seems to resume instantly. That really isn't too bad if you compare it to other products. The average heat pump, hot water heater, vacuum cleaner, clothes dryer, and dishwasher use more electricity than the average computer. I have a new computer that uses 1.6 amps and 65 W. That also includes the monitor, speakers, etc. It is very fast, and it also has a good ATI Radeon graphics card. I think that is good power consumption.

No it didn't change. Windows XP is an operating system. It also includes web browsing, Media Player, games, word processing, and image editing. You said that Windows XP is a package. I simply stated that Windows XP is the operating system, and Windows XP with Microsoft Office is a package.

I'm sorry. I'm just posting the facts about Windows. I never even said that Linux is bad. I just said it doesn't work with a lot of hardware and software so I wondered why anyone would want it.

How can you say that? You never even used Vista. It could be really good.

What was the point? I said I never heard of MSWinPOS before. I also can't find anything about it on search engines. Your reply was: How did that explain anything about MSWinPOS?

No, Windows XP is the operating system. You can buy packages that include Windows XP and Microsoft Office. However, you can't buy Windows XP without the games, IE, Media Player, etc. I suppose WordPad isn't very advanced, but it is better than what some operating systems come with. I also think Microsoft Paint is a fairly good picture editor. I've designed some Internet banner ads using Microsoft Paint. Does that post actually have a point, or did you just feel like typing something?

Huh? I've spent plenty of time on Microsoft's web site, but I've never heard of that.

Check out: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/default.mspx

Your definition of an operating system is a little old. Today, a good operating system includes everything the average user would need to enjoy their computer. This includes advanced word processors, web browsing, media players, picture editors, security software, games, and more. A good example is Windows XP. Not all, but some non-Windows operating systems are living in the past, and don't seem to keep up with public interest. That's why Windows is often a better choice for the average computer user.

It has been officially been announced. The next version of Windows will be called Windows Vista. It will be released in 2006. Microsoft hasn't officially said too much about it yet, but I know a few things about it. First, the GUI will be very high-tech. You are going to need a good graphics card to run the next Windows. A major feature will be the new type of icons. The icons will actually show a preview of the entire document, or picture. It will be much more than the Windows XP thumbnails. It will also feature IE7. Not too much is known about IE7, but I heard it will have tabbed browsing. Here is a little more technical information from Microsoft:

Windows ME was released for home users. Windows 2000 (Windows NT) was mainly for businesses. Windows XP combined the Windows 2000 and home versions. The Windows 2000 kernel was used for Window XP. That is why Windows XP is much more stable than some of the older home versions. My opinion is that all operating systems should use the same standards. The differences should be the GUI, and extra features. I think that all hardware and software should work easily on all operating systems. However, the reality is that most hardware and software works best with the Windows operating systems. That's why I can't understand why people would want another operating system with compatibility issues. The problem isn't really with the other operating systems, but it is still a big disadvantage to the other operating systems.

You are right. I really have no reason to call them ghosts. I would just like to know what they are because they seem so strange. I would like to know why I've never taken these types of pictures with my own camera outside of Gettysburg. I'm not saying this mystery only exists in Gettysburg. Whatever created the orbs in my pictures may have created the orbs in the pictures from other people. However, what is different about these orb pictures and the pictures I take around my home that never have orbs?

I already explained why I haven't done those experiments. I don't know when or if I'll go back to Gettysburg:

What do you mean? I've taken other pictures before, and the only place I see "ghost-like" figures is Gettysburg.