herme3

What does everyone think about the avatar picture under my username? He used to be a smiley face, but he was involved in a tragic accident.

I just found some evidence that supports the existence of John Titor. Go to: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/john_titor_ats_project.html They have pictures of the time machine!

The word "ectoplasm" was created before Ghostbusters. Let's say you are watching a Sci-Fi movie about snakes. A scientist says, "Snakes eat mice". Now, does that make it impossible for real snakes to eat mice just because a fictional character said it? I don't think so...

I must admit that I do not understand most of your posts. However, I have heard about the New World Order. Isn't that the theory that there is a shadow government called the Omega agency? I always heard that the New World Order is when some people think Omega will take control of everyone. I don't think I ever really believed in the New World Order, but it is interesting. What do you know about it, and how did you learn about it? I learned about it from http://www.abovetopsecret.com but I think a lot of that information is fake.

How is the thought that we were created by a giant explosion make any more sense than ghosts? Where does everyone believe our souls go? We have to have some type of a soul or we wouldn't be conscious. Our brains are like computers. They are not capable of giving us our sense of reality. Our brains simply process the data of our world, and create our thoughts. Without a soul, our thoughts would not be recognized by ourselves. Look at a computer. It processes data, but it really has no idea what it is processing. We are aware of the data our brains process. Therefore, there has to be another component that makes us who we are. I believe that this is a soul. Due to the fact that a soul is not part of our human body, it has to be more like energy. It has to escape somewhere when we die.

Sonic

17/m/USA I'll be 18 in 4 months...

The water would be moving down, because it is being pulled by gravity. In the picture, the "tails" of the orbs are pointed down. That means the orb is moving up. I wasn't holding the camera upside down, so how could water move up? Ghosts are believed to be made out of ectoplasm. According to dictionary.com: Ectoplasm-The outer portion of the continuous phase of cytoplasm of a cell, sometimes distinguishable as a somewhat rigid, gelled layer beneath the cell membrane. It also says: The visible substance believed to emanate from the body of a spiritualistic medium during communication with the dead.

What about the orbs that are on top of each other, but still being two separate orbs? Water would merge together into one big drop of water. Also, why are some of them moving up?

Why? I had my camera, pointed it into the open field, and pressed the button. These are the pictures it took.

Wow! I completely forgot about this picture! It was taken at "Devil's Den". Crazy, huh? It looks like many of the orbs are behind other orbs. If these were drops of water, wouldn't they combine to form one big drop of water? They also appear to be in motion. They look like comets, and the "tails" are pointing down. Doesn't that mean the orbs are moving up? Try explaining that!!! The picture is at: http://gettysburg.homestead.com/files/devilsden.jpg

Why are you against creationists? Science is unable to explain how we got here. Nobody can say exactly what was before the big bang. Creationism provides a perfect answer that hasn't been proved incorrect yet.

It is everywhere! There are so many normal people that see ghosts every year. You can probably talk to friends or family members that you know wouldn't lie. I'm sure you will find someone that would share a ghost-like experience with you. The problem is when scientists see ghosts, they try to find a way to explain it with the idea that ghosts could never exist. Why do that? Why not except that the world isn't written in an encyclopedia. New discoveries are made every day. There are things that we can't explain. Don't try to explain it using our existing knowledge. Just try to understand the mysteries, and combine them with our existing knowledge.

There is plenty of evidence that supports ghosts. I've read all about it in ghosts books. Yes, I am a creationist. They closed the thread. I guess they got mad because I brought up some good questions that nobody could explain. I'm always good at bringing up points that make people realize they need to expand the category of what we believe is true. The same applies for ghost-like objects.

Ok' date=' using the term "non-haunted" was a mistake. Nobody knows what makes something haunted or not. Ghosts could be anywhere, because someone can die anywhere. There could be a dead body right below where your sister is standing... If you do see an orb, or something that is ghost-like, there is no way anyone can prove that it isn't a ghost. Nope, I don't think it could be water. I went to Gettysburg two times when I was taking these pictures. The second time, I made sure that the lens were clean before taking each picture. I still got the orbs in the pictures. It wasn't raining or foggy either. I am not trying to make my web site popular here. It is already popular on search engines. I have the #1 spot for Gettysburg Ghost Web Site on yahoo.com and I receive hundreds of visitors. You can read in my guestbook, that many people like my web site. Also, I have nothing to gain from making this web site popular. I don't have any advertisements or anything on the site. I'm actually paying to keep it up. It was designed to show people my ghost-like pictures, it won't make a profit no matter how popular it becomes. I own an Internet marketing company. If I was just trying to make my web site popular, I wouldn't be here. I am looking for a scientific explanation that I can agree with. There are only 5 pictures on my web site. I actually have about 100 other pictures I took that aren't there. On some of the pictures, it is obvious that some orbs are behind trees, and others are in front of trees. I think that would also prove that it is not water on the lens.

There is nothing strange about a stain on a shower curtain. Anybody could do that. However, a giant ball of light floating in the sky is not normal. Also, I find it a little odd when you are able to see through a person... Those are ordinary objects. I see them all the time. However, if I go around with my camera, it is rare for me to see a "lens flare" that looks like a giant ball of light floating in the sky. If lens flares are common, why don't I see them in any picture outside of Gettysburg?

I started a new thread about time travel, and everyone started talking about ghosts. Therefore, I posted in this thread again so the time travel thread could get back on topic. I do not believe there is enough evidence to support your "rational explanation". If I could go into a non-haunted field and get the same type of picture as http://gettysburg.homestead.com/picture2.html then I will believe your explanation. Just look at all the orbs! Some are close, some are far away. If there was just one, I would believe that it was a lens flare or something. Yes, but your picture is obviously a coincidence. It is just a stain that is shaped a little like a face. My pictures can't be explained in a rational way. Saying that "lens flares" happen to appear on hundreds of cameras only in Gettysburg is not rational. Oh, I see. That does look like a lens flare. The first two pictures on my web site do not look anything like that...

You have a really good point. However, I don't think anyone here really knows the concept of time travel. There may be some details about this that John never posted. Perhaps the timelines break apart after certain events. Maybe year 2000 was when our timelines broke apart. We never saw any effects, but maybe his timeline saw the world "fall apart" after the year 2000. When he said he wanted to see the effects of the millennium bug, maybe he couldn't imagine how it couldn't do any harm in our timeline. I really don't know...

Yes, Wikipedia says: In time travel, one does not actually enter one's own past because, at a minimum, one's own presence in the past makes a change and generates a new, ever-expanding set of worldlines. One enters rather the past of a closely-related worldline. Therefore, the worldline John Titor describes as his "past" is very similar, but not identical, to our own present and near future.

I would say that is either carpet or a wall with water spilled on it.

I thought he said that he was standing on the ground and looking up at the plane...

Did you read John's explanation of how time works? He said that there are different levels of time. Even though he existed in our world, he came from a different timeline. No matter what he did in our timeline, it wouldn't effect what would happen when he gets back home. The only thing that will change his timeline is the fact that he took the computer with him when he left. His posts were probably to save us from Civil War. We are still going to die in his timeline because there is no way he can change his own timeline.