cjn6980

yeah i've seen it but it's out of date. for up to date i went to starchildproject.com. much better reading and the other guy's article is full of bs, half-truths, omitted info and totally closed minded biased views. if he is an archaeologist he isn't a scientist in these matters. he digs in dirt and pulls out.... what? bones for study??? contradictory there don't you think?? why else would we know weather the ice man was a vegan or if the recent skeleton they found is king richard? i think he's jealous he didn't get to discover it is all.

i don't know if this starchild skull is news worthy to anybody that hasn't read about it. if you haven't i urge you to go check it out. after you do and you think there might be reason to do more research on it please go to wh.gov/VzQA for a petition for such studies. i have read and agree it should be studied more even if only to study it for future health and medical research. i hope i'm not breaking any rules for this but i can't understand why getting funding or testing done on this is harder than getting it for a study on colors and how they make one feel. really, i find it fascinating, as well as all the nice names and pleasant responses i receive whenever i bring the subject up. i for one hope it's another "link" in our chain to help prove, or disprove if it comes to that, our evolution. or could there be hope for more intelligent life, and after the people i've dealt with over this i seriously hope something is more intelligent than us.