WoodScorp

Just a quick reply to your 2nd comment. I agree and I do not profess as stated previously the academic or working knowledge to present an equation, I am not a scientist, I am a common man with an interest in that which I do not know, particularly relating to "The theory of everything" I would care to think that if academics can educate me to a point where I can understand this theory then surely that would be better for us all rather than just leaving it to those who can do the math That's just my thoughts With relation to the quote I did not appreciate it's context and therefore irony relating to your signature, very self effacing I must say. Unfortunately in the context of the message I saw it as referring to my post

In that instance let me give you the most sincere apology for any offence, Let me say that you were fine until that last quote, that one just raised the blood pressure. Once again apologies for my misunderstanding. Have a nice day

Dear Kras661 Thank you for your comment and if indeed the purpose of this forum were to purely relate to a single equation of everything may I suggest that it should have been titled "The Equation of Everything". This aside I appreciate that from your perspective this may be your understanding and in sincerity I would be unable with my current knowledge to facilitate this to you. I hope that your grasp of English language equals that of your mathematical knowledge. If I may enlighten you this is a science forum site, let me further break it down by definition; Science, the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment. Forum, A meeting or medium where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged. Fortunately this forum and those who monitor it are happy to allow the interaction of those whose knowledge is limited and may not be backed by academic qualification to interact and exchange IDEAS with those who are more qualified or have a greater knowledge to answer and or assist. Unfortunately I see no assistance in your post and indeed I am sad to say that what I do see is mockery. Please feel free to quote me on this one if you wish. Have a nice day

Thanks STP I appreciate the feedback. With relation to hard pointers, could you clarify what this could be to you? In way of an example I myself would like to suppose that the data seeming to show the existence of 2 Higgs Bosons (let us put the calibration issue to one side) in very close mass proximity but yet decaying in 2 very different manners could indicate a very different field (dimension?) surrounding these particles making one react in a pre standard model theory manner and the second verifying the standard model. I appreciate the above data relating to Higgs Boson still needs clarification in the near future but we are supposing, so what would you suppose as a hard pointer?

Hi all As a newbie it seems I may have selected thee wrong thread to enter, however now I'm in at in at the deep end let’s see how well I can swim or at least stay afloat. In all sincerity I cannot agree with Lepton nor can I disagree, simply because I do not have any information or data to refer to with which to draw a conclusion. Either way it seems to me that maybe dear Lepton although not supposedly accurate does throw up some interesting concepts. It is a fact that humans interpret there environment in a common way which we term reality, this is not to say that is the reality of the cosmos. Just as a single cell creature detects it's environment through positive and negative charge within its body, that is it's reality, and as such protozoa have no means of seeing or understanding our world. With the above premise in mind it is not inconceivable that we live in a multidimensional environment, we cannot see it because we like all life on earth evolved to interpret our reality to survive; anything which did not have direct impact on our ability to live and procreate is simply unnecessary information. We the human race are constantly striving to learn, we learn through trial and error, through the sharing of ideas and concepts and argument/discussion of the same. It is hypothesised that the universe is multidimensional which Lepton clearly believes and I have to concur, Lepton has striven to explain something which really is by definition unexplainable. Ask anyone in the field to explain the multidimensional cosmos and they all struggle, because it simply is not within our current range of senses or perception. Have a nice day all