Popcorn Sutton

I just received a letter from MIT admissions to the BCS department. They denied me. I'm sad. I'm stuck now with no back up plan. I was going to share my code for the talking machine too (i was going to share it today for the sake of science and the benefit it may have to humanity) but now my heart is aching and I need to determine my own path for survival. It may be the only thing I have. While I was waiting for the letter, alot of people (professors included) suggested that I probably got accepted, so it was a bit of a surprise to me. Anyway, I need to live and pay off my debt somehow. Does anyone have any suggestions? About the program though, it's all set up. I have the code and it should be able to learn any language (even dolphin). I have no doubt about the use this program will have and that when people experience it for themselves, they will see the value as well. So I guess I'll focus on that.

You might need to merge mechanical computational mechanisms with the cell. Researching how cells make use of metals without rejecting them could provide some insight. My hunch is that metals are probably mostly located at the membrane

Well, since objects like metal don't provide the same form of input that our eyes and ears and other senses provide, they typically get rejected. To solve the problem of rejection, you need something that the body uses and need to make an interface out of that. To the best of my knowledge, hair is very efficient for transferring energy and has been used to cheapen the cost of solar panels. So people have successfully used hair to catch and transmit energy, so that is a plausible solution to the rejection problem. But as for translating the internet to sensory input, that will require research. I'm willing to help. All information we receive is in the form of pressure fluctuations (good thing to remember).

I think I have the language problem solved and I want to get the program on the internet asap. I'll share the code with whoever thinks that they can help get it up on the internet. It works well and sounds human enough. I'm willing to maintain the domain, I just need some help. I'll help with the code too if needed. It's written in python 2.7

The communication is probably already occurring, and the best way to measure it is by using the tools that our brains have. When these substances interact, they probably radiate energy. If the energy being radiated is at a high frequency, it should appear on a scale that is recognizable at least by the tools we have "built-in" to our cells. So if they do radiate enough energy, then they should influence the shape of the parameter surrounding the radiation. If the distortion in the shape is strong enough other cells will pick up on it. If it is too forceful, then it may cause the parameter to burst, in which case the energy would travel to the next parameter. Well, if enough cells pick up on the force, and the force is transformed into a macroscopic permutation of the environment in which it occurred, then the message would be recognizable. One may even vocalize the message. But then again, a lot of what you are saying is word salad to me, but if it fits in any way with my theory of the way things are, then this is a probable association.

I do need them for now because I can't live in my car, the cops won't allow that. Unfortunately, their behavior is so fixed that I can't have any decent conversation with them. I am literally being nagged to death every time I am in their presence. My entire family seems to hate me, that much is obvious from their behavior. They are always passive aggressive when they talk to me. My dad will say things but every time he says something, he basically has the same subsumption. He blames everything on me. I don't even want to talk about it, it brings me a lot of unjustified anxiety. Every time they talk to me or send me a message or something, it might say something like "where are you" but really it means "I hate you, come home and clean". I get paralyzed every time I interact with them, and the paralysis lasts. I literally can't say anything to them that will cause them to be nice to me or get off my back, so recently I've just decided, I'm not going to interact with them any more than I have to. I get a message like, "where are you" and I send back "on earth", to which they respond "answer me now or I'm going to be pissed", but it doesn't even matter because they already are pissed at that point and they have been pissed at me for over 10 years now. And when I say that they paralyze me, I literally mean that I cannot have a single constructive though after they say anything to me. My mind gets fixed on my hatred and isn't constructive at all. I'm really not a bad person, they have no good reasons to be angry with me. "What are you doing?" I answered this question honestly for the first time yesterday, "I'm doing math." I'm not a normal boy in any way, and they are not normal parents. If your kid was doing math, would you be pissed? How can you be pissed if your kid spends most of their free time researching, writing computer programs, doing math, and stuff like that? My parents are embarrassing, paralyzing, destructive, and flat out abusive. They don't physically abuse me (normally) but they abuse the shit out of me mentally. Yesterday I was coming up with a theory (which was exciting to say the least) and I happened to receive a text message from my mom. Immediately and uncontestably, my mind focused on hatred. "Where are you" is then the most important question in the world and my future life depends on the answer to this question. It's ridiculous, I can't stand their behavior. The other day, I decided to post a semi-controversial status on facebook "I hate porn", my mom, dad, and brother all gave me a bunch of shit for it and demanded that I delete the status. Good conversations came from that status. I'm on the verge of deleting my family from facebook. I could go on for days about how bad they are, but this is a science forum, and the things that get published on this forum should be goal oriented in some way. That being said. Here are the generalities of their behavior, and I will provide (honestly) the pragmatic aspects that led to the behavior and its fixed nature. Generalities- Passive Agression- Ex. (mom opens the door) "What are you doing?" "I'm writing an essay mom" "You need to clean this room its ridiculous" (this happens often and as I said, it paralyzes me, interrupts my train of thought, pisses me off, and is completely destructive. I don't have the time or energy to maintain a perfectly clean room, the request is unreasonable. Eventually the room will become maximally entropic, which means that it is perfectly in order, but appears disorderly. Right now, "Did you take one of them antibiotics?" "Yes I did" "You gonna go eat your whopper?" "no not right now" (you need to hear the tone of the voice though to understand that it is passive aggressive) Dad- straight forward, no bullshit, "what are you guys doing?" (me and my friend) "we're talking" "the nights over" No possibility of change- No matter what they say, it always has the same tone (condescending and hateful). I've pointed it out several times "Mom, I'm actually trying to speak smart with you right now so we can work through this issue" "Mer mer mer nag nag nag" "Do you notice your behavior? There is a pattern there, and it hasn't changed and it probably won't change." "Mer mer nag nag nag" "Can't we be friends? Can we be nice to each other?" "I AM nice to you, you just don't do what I tell you to do!" (she's not nice at all, she probably hates me) The pattern of behavior has persisted throughout my entire life now that I think about it. She used to grab my arm, get a really nasty look on her face, stare me blank in the eyes, and dig her nails into my skin while telling me what I "will" do. Hating all my friends. Always telling me to do something (and if I do it, then you can be sure that there is something else to do next). The most important information in their life is completely stupid, often abusive and very degrading (paralyzing) sentences and questions. All of which have a condescending tone to them. Hating everything I do. Heaven forbid if I sit on the toilet too long. The pragmatic aspect that heightens the psychosis involved is whenever I do something that they don't want me to do... or don't do something that they wan't me to do. I'm done talking about this, it seriously isn't going to change, and I don't think anyone can help unless they're giving me a paycheck I can live off of. (NB. I work for my dad and get paid shit. The job is very stressful and unfortunately, my dad is the top dog, so his behavior has pervaded through the business. Incidentally, I'm probably a source of stress for my coworkers because they know my dad is the big guy). And, to reply to random's post. I've been diagnosed schizophrenic, schizo-affective, mild to moderately bipolar, non schizophrenic, not bipolar. The diagnoses are just labels that the doctors need to use for insurance purposes. I'm not sure if I have a mental disorder, I got along just fine without medication for a very long time until the day my dad cornered me and chased me and dragged me by my collar to a psych ward. I'm pretty sure that all of my "mental problems" can be successfully linked back to my family and the way people have treated me. I became schizo because I gained a lot of fame at my university for teaching classes (I could hear everyone talking about me, it was very disturbing. I hate when people talk about someone in their proximity and assume that that person can't hear what is being said. I'm pretty sure that I can hear a whisper in China if it's directed towards me)

Basically, the vehicle has to be maximal at present and in the future for the longer distances, so you also need a very durable vehicle. Which means that you need to make the poi "unpoppable" If the poi were the npoi, then there is no problem. The process would be extremely efficient

I never knew what c was until just recently. I've been taking it as meaning the maximum speed for everything lately, which would make sense to me. (My strength is in my weakness). That being said, is there another way to get from point A to be B? The answer is yes. I call it focussed unirepelsive spatially parametric discharge, and as long as you maintain a unirepelsive field that is greater than the size of the object traveling, then the object should travel through the empty space to the point of interest free of inertia until it needs to decelerate. The absolute cure to inertia is still unclear. A substance with unirepelsive properties would be one that decays very quickly. The quicker decay, the quicker movement through space. There is a fuel we could use for this type of travel too. Basically you have to have a very solid, yet very thin layer that can easily be popped around a poi. If you pop it, the future will cause the repelsive burst that you need to focus in front of the vehicle. The poi being the closest thing to nothing that you can get. And I'm pretty sure that if we mastered this technique, we would realize that we were both disintegrated and generated simultaneously. And if the fuel wasn't unirepelsive, then we might be able to recollect a portion of the travel (it would be crazy if it was actually recognizable though).

Well, since we've established quantum mechanics, and the concept that a particle can be in many places simultaneously, and also this idea of spooky interactions, I thought I'd take a stab at expansion. If expansion is true, and the other things I mentioned are also true, then it could follow that the future is actually what is causing the expansion. If you want to get more details of my personal theory, read cognitive intemporality in speculations. It hasn't been disproven yet, and all attempts to do so have been fallacious. I've also introduced another concept that deals with thought and paranormal activity. I want to rename it, but you guys can stick whatever label you want with the phenomena. I want to call it "platonistically nonintersegmental dispositional force intrusions". This idea, in combination with the others I presented here, states that the multiverse and the future can directly influence us (more precisely, influence our gravitational points [points of interest]). It occurred to me that even if the forms do not intersect with each other, they may be intersecting with the point of interest. If this is the case, then basically they are intersecting something that is independent of space and time and could literally exist everywhere (at any point in space), and it seems like it does. Well, speculating on, if two particles can interact spookily, then why not 2 poi's. In fact, if the poi is located at every point in space (but has no length), and something directly intersects it (in whichever universe), then, if all poi's are the same, then every poi should be affected. The poi would be like a very sharp edge that reduces the substance intersecting with it. If this is the case, and the substance does affect the poi (and in fact all poi's), then maybe all poi's shift simultaneously. Well, if the poi its not sufficiently solidified, then the intersection would reduce the substance and cause some radiation. This radiation, no matter how minute, if it perpetuates, then it could influence the movement of the things surrounding it. Nevermind, I just realized that this entire post is moot. If the poi exists at every point in space, then the radiation would essentially cancel itself out. So if every point was the same, and they were all affected, then it would basically push everything towards the solidified poi, but not cause the universe to expand. However, if you want to accept that one poi is different from another (the npoi), and that they can both exist at the same instant within the same vicinity, then if the poi was influenced, then only the poi would radiate (and vice versa for the npoi). To me, I want to think that maybe (if this is true) the npoi is causing expansion, while the poi is probably contained within solidified substances. If this is the case, then the poi is hot, and the npoi is substantially cooler, but still probably radiates heat.

Before I start commenting, I'd like to thank you mike for taking all the time to write these things out and provide links. It's truly generous of you. That being said, I'll use whatever time I have now to go through them, and hopefully, with the permission of the moderators, I can comment on them within this context. Ok, referring back to the post with links, it seems like it's all saying the same thing, and the math and graphs are incomprehensible to me. What I do know, within the lingual framework, is that if there is a possibility of something occurring, then there is a probability that we will pick up on it in some way. (note that our brains are very sophisticated devices that probably already have all the tools we need to measure events like the quantum tunneling effect and dispersive radiation, they just don't appear as logical measurements, rather, they appear as thought). If the lingual theory of everything is right, then it assumes everything we know (even if it isn't right) and it also assumes everything we don't know. So, in that sense, all the knowledge we will ever gain or need already exists out there, but the problem is that in order for us to recognize it (as a thought or so), in needs to be within our knowledge. Well, refer to my thread on cognitive intemporality if you want the phenomena of knowledge to be a little more clear within this framework. In regards to quantum tunneling, it can be seen and recognized cognitively. Say that someone tells you something you've never previously heard before (example below). Introspect while you read this example and don't allow yourself to read it more than once. After youre done reading it, try to repay the entire message in your head (experimentally, the prediction is something called threading, I'll explain after). As you are reading, take note of the "barriers" or "parameters" that you encounter. Example. When the substances seem to converge, they radiate what is known as "limphosequential operative suction". Now repeat what you can from that statement. Ask yourself, did my thoughts trail off at any point? Did I capture the essence of the message? Did it prompt other information? To me, the answer is always yes. If you encounter a message for the first time that just seems so irrelevant to your general mindset, then youwil encounter parameters, and your thoughts may trail off. This effect of thought is essentially the same thing that occurs with quantum tunneling. A probability "wave" hits whatever is in it's path and essentially prompts every bit of information contained within the barrier. (it essentially tunnels through the barrier in every probable direction that it can), while it does that, time is essentially halted and the computation takes place independent of time. What happens then is that not only the barrier gets prompted, but also, all information associated with that barrier that occurs within it's proximity and is also contained within the knowledge gets prompted as well. There are various directions that the prompting can take place, all of which are called sumptions (assumption, presumption, circumsumption, subsumption). What the sumptions do is prompt the poi (in this case, the barrier [diode]) and all proximal knowledge emerges. However, what becomes observable is (vry possibly) only the unit with the most probabilistic strength (meaning that this particular unit, an electron, is prompted most often, and hence becomes observable beyond the barrier). And, if it is the first thing that emerges, and also bears the strongest probability, then it will be the only thing prompted. This essentially means that the barrier the electron first encountered is actually communicating that electron. However, if this theory is true, then if you simultaneously throw all different types of particles at the barrier, then only the ones with the most probabilistic strength will be communicated (depending on the order that they emerged epistemically). My prediction is that if the barrier didn't contain electrons, and you threw an electron at it, you wouldn't see an electron pop out on the other side. Instead, the electron would get reduced to something that is within its knowledge, and you would probably see that object get prompted on the other side (which could be radiation or light or something else).

Inconsistent with my observations

So there needs to be a new name which permits this possibility. Quick someone name it! I vote platonic nonintersegmental disruptive force intrusion Or substitute disruptive for dispositional (that ones for the psychologists out there)

I bet if you found a way to harmonize every wave in our surroundings, you could literally observe a smaller, faster universe unfold. But you would have to be able to measure it It just occurred to me that this would essentially require a black hole. And a radiation recognizer, which could actually make the entire experiment useless if it's not st least translucent

That doesn't contradict my observations in any way. I haven't reliably had any objective recordings of this phenomena in action, and it's still a very counter intuitive paradigm, but I have no doubt that it will become a known truism. It's one of those things that the sooner you start believing, the better. Just make it clear that you have good intentions. Yay for clerics.

This may be a bit controversial (and I love controversy), but I think I have talked with aliens too (even if they inhabit the same place). You can do it cognitively. I've described the phenomena in my thread "cognitive intemporality". One time, I said to myself, maybe I am actually taking to the entire universe, to which I heard many simultaneous voices reply "what!?" But it could also be explained by cells thinking independently in language all knowing different instances of the word "what" being prompted simultaneously at the same strength. It's tough to make any clear distinctions

*looks left... looks right... checks the walls for cameras... leans in and whispers* deryuhevrytin *does the dance from dumb and dumber*

I'll make note first that I haven't read the entire thread, and that being said, heres my thoughts. We are pattern finding machines. Different waves are like different forms of input. Our interlocutors maximize our knowledge, knowledge that would else wise remain in seperate units. The units are anything observable, but the most important unit is the one that does the observing, because that unit is what makes sense. If music just happens to tell one maximal, predictable, epic sequence of concepts, then we may have a psychlognic orgasm because of it. Sometimes it can be a perfectly defined unit that is simply inexpressible in any other way. And when I use the term "defined", I mean that it is efficiently associated with proximal concepts.

I'm in. There are several I got my sights on, but I don't want to get banned lol.

I found thay your geological puns are a bit quakey. Theres too much on my plate to let people rock my mind with watered down sediments towards an unnamed quack that burst through the crust of modern science.

I didn't mean to be personal about it, it's widely accepted that things have length. And to prove myself wrong, you can find things without length in time, but it's only found at the beginning, never from within the entire sequence... computationally, time being a string.

My theory states that time is the length between two point. If there is no length, there is no time. Is that a contradiction? If so, why? I'll have to look into Lorentz equation, but it seems to be consistent with my observations.

I liked what someone mentioned in a different thread about probability being [the most reduced substance]. It seems to me that probability does travel fastest in order for all things with mass to follow in it's wake, but who am I kidding, ok just labeling.

I haven't started using github yet, the short term goal is a TOE, long term, if we give it the right tools, it will be able to do whatever we teach it. But, the program I have only does whatever unit had the strongest capacity, which seems to produce grammatical output. Theres alot more to say about this but I'll have to reread your post.

I had to make a proviso before I finished reading. A particle takes all PROBABLE paths between two points. All possible would be extremely inefficient

Segmentation is being used interchangeably with reduction here.