Popcorn Sutton

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzGPJ4-xoC1oajV0dDkxTUVFcXc/edit?usp=sharing This paper covers my findings of how to acquire knowledge computationally and the implications it has on physics. You can call it the bounce theory of reduction too if you want.

Thanks for the depth of your responses. It does make a lot of sense that I would have to jeapordize other areas of my body (which I am not willing to do for survival purposes). But if I can think hard enough about the topic, so hard that it becomes strongly embedded within my DNA, maybe future generations have a chance at developing them. I'd rather have computers that mimick human intelligence and technology that will allow us to do those things, but that is just simply not going to happen in the near future, unless I am able to do something about it. The only thing within my power of doing (which is at the peripheries of modern science and hence, progressively useful) is to write a computer program that will dissolve and segment input, and with a little work, we could get it to generate output. So it could show what a human with wings would look like (if it were prompted to do so), and it would also be able to generate technological blueprints of what the technology would need to be like in order to fly the way I want.... but thats besides the topic. In all reality, my main studies concern computational cognition, and through those studies, I am developing a lot of insight into what to look for biologically (mostly neurologically at the moment seeing as how I'm often dealing with sense). Another question I would like to ask the biologists is this. We know we have knowledge, and language and cognition in general seems to be reducible to knowledge, does knowledge exist physically? What is it? I can elaborate on that one too if you guys think you don't know the answer. It requires thought. Then, once we know what knowledge is, we may be able to alter it somehow (pill? invasive procedures?), and if that is the case, maybe we could alter it enough to start sprouting wings from our backs.

You guys aren't addressing the topic. My assumption here is that literally nothing is impossible if we had a theory of everything. So assuming that, it is possible for me to grow a pair of wings (and keep the rest of my limbs). Why do we have shoulder blades? I see no practical utility for them (i may be wrong), they may be remnants of something we once had that was wing like. If that is the case, then I indeed already am predisposed to acquiring wings, and like having the predisposition to acquire depression, I assume that that gene can be activated under the right circumstances. So, all the talk of impossibility aside, literally, what needs to be done for me to grow a pair? I know this has never been thought about in depth, but I think it is something worth investigating. Maybe I'll start by looking at genomes.

I'm seriously pissed and you guys seemingly have no explanation. http://youtu.be/g5P7FadUugI I video taped myself talking about this, please watch the video. If you disregard the video, I'll post more here. I literally want wings. I don't normally just come out and say things like this if they haven't been on my mind for a while already. I've literally thought in great detail of what is necessary for me to have wings and I've exercised the areas of my back where they need to be growing from. There are good ideas of general science that can help in the study of this topic, which I talk about in the video. Namely, pragmatic aspects of acquiring wings. If anyone has any logical formulation of what it would take for me to grow a pair of wings, please come out with it. I'm willing to be the experimental interface for this area of research, I've been wanting to fly for years now. Thanks in advance for your sincerity.