Strange

That has been known for a long time. I'm not sure how it is relevant to this thread. As kinetic energy, in the chosen frame of reference. It has nothing to do with "Einstein's logic". That could be totally wrong. It doesn't affect the validity of the theories.

There are loads of articles on this online.They seem to suggest between around 50 and 100ml of hydrogen peroxide. (And recommend safety equipment.)

In the UK, the Open University made it easier for working people to get a second chance at an education. (I started working towards a degree but gave up for a variety of reasons - lack of time, money, etc.) There are so many online courses now, run by prestigious universities and colleges, it makes it much easier than in the past.

Why don't you start...

As this is more technology focussed, then I think the methodology would need to discuss the evaluation of the different algorithms (e.g performance, cost (such as compute time), security, etc), how you evaluated them (running simulations, mathematical analysis, finding research papers who have done that), why you chose that set of algorithms, etc. Or ... ask your tutor.

This is not scientific research, so I don't know what you are looking for. Is this chapter something you have read, or something you are expected to write? If the latter, then I think you would just describe what areas of security you decided to look at (the various technologies, the reasons for security vulnerabilities, the types of attack, etc) and why, where you looked for information, who you interviewed, etc. If this is for a course, why not ask your lecturer / tutor for advise? Maybe.

! Moderator Note And we are done

! Moderator Note This is (a) off topic and (b) wrong. If you want to discuss your misunderstanding of the word "humanist" start a new thread.

It is this sort of deliberate obtuseness that gets your threads closed. If you were open-minded enough to learn instead of just repeating the same obviously false statements, then there might be hope for a dialog. But if you are going to insist that your factually incorrect assertions are "logic" and everyone else (and all the evidence) is wrong, then there is no hope. If you don't like the rules of the forum, and you don't find it a useful place for discussion, then maybe you should leave.

! Moderator Note Why are you ignoring the explanations you have been given? Stubbornness? Or do you just not understand them? Until you are willing to learn, this thread is closed. Do not open another one on this subject.

Quite a lot of different but related reasons. For example, if infant mortality is lower then there is less incentive to have more children. As a society gets wealthier there more opportunities for education and paid work. If people are healthier and better educated, they no longer live at subsistence level, and have less need for children to work the land and support them. And so on.

Well, they obviously know something you don’t. The average global birth rate fell below the replacement level years ago. So fewer people are being born than will die each year. So the population will level off in a few decades. Again: evidence?

Do you have any evidence for that? Because we don't like crazy conspiracy theories here.

What do you mean? It was attempting to detect a (relatively) stationary medium that light travelled through. It failed to detect that because it doesn't exist. Not sure how that is relevant.

So not common. And, presumably because it isn't used, not cheap (or not practical) either.

What do you mean by an "exit point" for black holes? Some stars turn into supernovas and form black holes. Is that what you mean? In what way?

! Moderator Note Moved to Homework Help

More seriously, you could look at some of those high profile cases and see what security lapses led to their information being leaked: weak passwords, human factors, system hacked, etc. You could also take a look at the website https://haveibeenpwned.com which tracks security breaches to get an idea of the scale of the problem. You could try contacting the guy who runs it and other security researchers (check their twitter accounts, for example) for information. There are a lot of Internet security people who have blogs and write about cloud security. A google search should find you several.

! Moderator Note Moved to Speculations

! Moderator Note This does not meet the standards of a scientific discussion per the rules of the Speculation forum. Do not bring this up again.

! Moderator Note Then this thread is closed. Don’t bring this up again.

There is no "absolute" (universal) way to quantify it. It is observer dependent. You can, however, choose to represent the energy as relativistic mass. It is not usually a useful thing to do, though because most physics where mass is involved requires the rest mass. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_in_special_relativity#The_relativistic_mass_concept On the other hand, the thermal energy is not observer dependent and so it contributes to the rest mass of the object. An therefore is relevant to anything where the mass of the object is required.

! Moderator Note Then tell us what it is or this thread will be closed. ! Moderator Note This does not appear to have anything do with Quantum Theory so I have moved it to Relativity. For the moment.

Which sounds like "continuous" (to me). Taking intervals of time as the limit approaches zero is how you get round Zeno's paradox (which all this rather sounds like).

Exactly. So it is purely a matter of how other people measure your length and time. Your rulers and clocks do not change. And yet you still seem to be saying that there is some change thing place in the clocks and rulers.