Strange

Why do you keep talking about force, when you are measuring voltage?

You think people just make this stuff up? Why don't you do an experiment with a wire moving through a magnetic field and test it yourself?

This article says that light pressure, along with several other causes, was considered: https://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1820/

I think everyone can see that you have failed to answer. You are the one making new claims, so you are the one that needs to answer questions. Another one: what is the evidence for your new magic force that no one else has ever seen?

This is your thread. What is your intention? You have an experiment that should NOT generate a voltage. And it does NOT generate a voltage. Then you invent a force for which there is no evidence. So what is the point of this thread? This one, for example: What do you expect from your experiment? And why?

Please read the rules of the forum. That just seems to be the contents of this thread converted to PDF. What is the point?

You are not making any sense. You are saying that there is no change in the field but at the same time that the stationary wire is moving through the field. This is contradictory. What is "Orman Force"? And what connection does it have with your experiment? What do you expect from your experiment? And why? (And why do you refuse to answer questions?)

Yes you did. You said: And the wire is not moving. So, no moving magnetic field and no moving wire. Therefore you admit that you do not have wire moving trough magnetic field. This is wrong. And it is irrelevant because you do not have a wire moving through a magnetic field. As you admit. What do you expect from your experiment? And why? Please show the math.

This is nonsense. But also, this is not what your "experiment" shows, so it is irrelevant. You do not have a wire moving through a magnetic field (as you admit). What do you expect from your experiment? And why? Please show the math. As you keep repeating ridiculous statements like this and refuse to provide sensible answers to questions I will request this thread is closed.

Do you mean "perpendicular"? So the N and S poles are along the long length of the magnet? Or do you mean a bar magnet with the N and S poles at each end? That is not true. (Maybe you can contrive a case where it is true but, in general, uniform motion of a wire through a magnetic field will generate a voltage.) But you seem to alternate between saying that there should be no voltage and saying that you expect to measure a voltage. So what do you expect to see?

Is it? After all, you (correctly) said: So there is no voltage expected.

But there is no relative motion. Static wire. Static magnetic field. Therefore no voltage. Why do you think there should be?

Where does it say that a static wire in a static magnetic field will generate a voltage? But that is not what you have. You have a static wire. No moving charged particles. No moving magnetic field. You have a uniform, static, unchanging, non-varying magnetic field. You have a static, non-moving wire in that uniform, static, unchanging, non-varying magnetic field. Theory says you will get NO voltage. What does your experiment show? NO VOLTAGE. What is wrong with that?

Keeping yourself “updated” with 7 year old news?

Therefore no voltage generated. What is the point of this thread? You get exactly the results expected, and yet you seem confused by it.

But I don't believe you have a moving magnetic field. Can you explain how the disk is magnetised (ie in which direction; where the N and S poles are) and why you think it will generate a changing magnetic field?

Are you moving the wire? I thought it was stationary?

You are not moving the conductor. Yes, because then you have s changing magnetic field. Exactly. No changing magnetic field so no voltage.

But I don't believe you have a moving magnetic field. Can you explain how the disk is magnetised (ie in which direction; where the N and S poles are) and why you think it will generate a changing magnetic field? Calculate the voltage generated in this way and tell me if your measuring instrument is able to measure it. Uhm. All of Faraday's experiments. Every similar experiment done at school. Every motor or generator....

That says: "Consider a conducting bar of length l moving through a uniform magnetic field..." So if you move the wire, you will get a voltage. But your spinning disk does not (as far as I can see) generate a changing magnetic field. Can you explain how it is magnetised and why you think it will generate a changing magnetic field?

You'll have to be more specific. I skimmed through a few pages of that but couldn't see anything that corresponds to your setup. Can you specify a page or figure number?

What is the orientation of the magnetisation of that disk? I am assuming that one face of the disk is the North pole and the other face is the South pole. In which case, the rotation will not have any effect on the magnetic field.

I can't see why you would expect any voltage to be generated. As far as I can see, you have a stationary wire in a static magnetic field. I can't see any connection between that paper and your experiment. Can you explain?

! Moderator Note Moved to Politics. But it looks like some sort of conspiracy theory. Unless you can provide evidence for your claims, this may not last long.

No. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_special_relativity This has nothing to do with the invariance of the speed light.