Strange

To describe inflation happening at more than the speed of light is meaningless. Expansion (or inflation) is a scaling effect not a speed. The "speed" of expansion/inflation depends on how far apart objects are. There are now (and presumably always have been) objects sufficiently far apart that they are spectating at more than the speed of light.

Well, I have to admit I didn't look at all 479 million google search results. But none of the ones I saw had "concern" meaning "to consider". Perhaps you could provide something more specific. In the meantime, the evidence I have seen shows your belief to be wrong. You mean "ignoring" (i.e. not looking at) not "ignorance" (i.e. not knowing about). Your belief that you are able to write clear English is become less sustainable with every post. Which raises the question why you didn't use "consider" if that is what you meant. And that is a bizarre adverb to use. I am not sure any native speaker would use it.

Not in English. This seems to be a (false) belief on your part.

It makes zero sense to me. Which meaning of concern (as a transitive verb) do you think you are using? https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/concern None of them seem appropriate in this construct. Or perhaps you meant "We may be highly concerned with the evidence".

I look forward to you not sharing anything.

You said: What is that, if not a (bad) description of the big bang model?

The only reason I haven't commented on it is because I haven't seen it which is because it is a video. So thanks for the link which confirms it is nothing to do with black holes exploding. And nothing to do with the point I made, which was that your description of the Big Bang was completely wrong.

You only believe you have no beliefs. But you are wrong.

Any evidence for that? Every experiment I have seen to test psychic abilities either shows no effect or is fundamentally flawed. It sounds like you are saying these effects are undetectably small. In which case, they might as well not exist.

The problem is, when you are a monomaniac you interpret everything in terms of your own beliefs. As PGJ so reliably demonstrates.

Can we set up an automated thing that posts this in response to anything written by PGJ and then locks the thread. It would save everyone a lot of time in the long run. Or just ban him for being an obsessive monomaniac, which is indistinguishable from trolling.

Fascinating (I had also assumed that only identical particles could be entangled). Here's another example: "Quantum entanglement between a single photon and a trillion rubidium atoms" https://m.phys.org/news/2017-03-quantum-entanglement-photon-trillion-rubidium.html

I didn't say you did. I was just pointing out that your description of matter expanding to fill space is completely wrong. I wonder, do you misrepresent the theory because you don't like it and so create a straw man? Or do you just not understand it (and maybe that is why you dislike it)? Brcausr you keep making completely erroneous statements about it.

You have yet to show how this can be done. All we have so far is an assertion that it can be done.

Anti-theists?

Photons are massless.

I am glad to see you are aware of these sort of biases. Good luck with your research.

It is OK. That is why we are talking about it. Well, you aren't. You are just insulting people for no reason. Shrug.

No it isn't. The Big Bang model says that the universe has always been completely full of matter. The universe then expanded, cooling the matter. Nonsense.

No and no. No one has done either of those things. You are being oversensitive to disagreement/questioning of your ideas.

You have only linked to a patent. Which means nothing. It is not a (scientific) paper. If you can't provide some real support for your claims I will assume it is fiction.

That oxytocin can reduce dislike/fear of the outgroup. What do you think it is about?

It isn't a paper. It is a patent application. Hint: don't believe everything you read.

No they aren't.

No. There was no black hole in the early universe because the universe was uniformly full of matter. And black holes do not explode.