joeman

The core rotates no faster, than the earth itself about 1038 mph. The rotation, and the molten activity (heat) are the main components that generates earth magnetic field. The answer to what sustains the molten temperatures in the lower mantle, and outer core. I believe the molten activity in the lower mantle, and outer core heats the inner core. Some scientist say the high temperature in the lower mantle, and outer core is sustained by residual temperatures from the creation of earth. Now, scientists say a nuclear geodynamo process sustains the high temperatures in the lower mantle, and outer core. I believe the high temperature in the lower mantle, and outer core is sustained by hydrocarbons, and not by a nuclear geodynamo process, because the radioactivity materials, and the radiation levels are not suited for fission activity. Volcanoes are the earth exhaust system, it discharge spent fuel, and regulates pressure in the lower mantle, and outer core of earth. The materials, and gases discharged from is an indicator of what processes are taking place in the lower mantle, and outer core. During volcanic eruption very low levels of benign, and non fission Material are ejected from volcanoes. The radiation level of the material discharges are so benign no radiation suits are needed by volcanologists, while they study volcanoes up close. There is no radiation fall out during volcanic eruption, and there's not enough radioactive material in the earth to support the high temperature in the lower mantle, and outer core. I believe the high temperatures in the lower mantle, and outer core is sustained by hydrocarbons e,g, crude oil, and natural gas. High quantities of hydrocarbons by-product are discharged during volcanic eruption, which means large quantities of hydrocarbons are being ignited in the lower mantle. the hydrocarbond enters the lower mantle as flame, heat, and pressure. One of the main component of oil, and natural gas is oxygen, so ignition of these hydrocarbons are possible. And hydrocarbons are capable of generating the temperature, and pressures found in the lower mantle, and outer core. The pathways of a oil, and gas well extends from the crust to the lower mantle, and the pathways of the volcano extends from the lower mantle to the surface e,g, volcanoes. Geochemistry: Hot heads and cold tails Nicholas Arndt Nature 407, 458-461(28 September 2000) doi:10.1038/35035176 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v407/n6803/fig_tab/407458a0_F1.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volcanic_gas The principal components of volcanic gases are water vapor (H2O), carbon, pressure, dioxide (CO2), sulfur either as sulfur dioxide (SO2) (high-temperature volcanic gases) or hydrogen sulfide (H2S) (low-temperature volcanic gases), nitrogen, argon, helium, neon, methane, carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Other compounds detected in volcanic gases are oxygen (meteoric), hydrogen chloride, hydrogen fluoride,hydrogen bromide, nitrogen oxide (NOx), sulfur hexafluoride, carbonyl sulfide, and organic compounds. Exotic trace compounds includemethylmercury, halocarbons (including CFCs), and halogen oxide radicals. what I'm saying is hydrocarbons sustains the high temperature in the lower mantle, and outer core. The lower mantle, and outer core is not receiving the fuel it once did, before oil companies began to extract oil, and natural gas. The lack of fuel is causing the core to cool, and this in turn is causing the earth magnetic, and gravitation fields to weaken. The gravitational field is derived from earth's magnetic field, and is strengthen by the earth's mass. The earth's orbital velocity, magnetic field, and gravitational field is the main component that hold earth is a stable orbit around the sun. Global warming is caused by the earth orbit around the sun destabilizing, due to the earth magnetic, and gravitational fields weakening. Hydro carbons fuels this planet.

REPLY: The website I posted better explain my point. I sure both of our websites are saying the same thing. I don't disagree with your website, I needed better clarification. REPLY: People have notice: http://www.divulgence.net/ http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/29dec_magneticfield/ http://geophysics.ou.edu/solid_earth/notes/precess/chandler.html See topic 2.3 on website below. http://www.columbia.edu/itc/ldeo/v1011x-1/jcm/Topic2/Topic2.html There is evidence, and you refuse to except it. Maybe this problem has not manifest in ways you think it should? http://www.divulgence.net/ http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/29dec_magneticfield/ http://geophysics.ou...s/chandler.html See topic 2.3 on website below. http://www.columbia....ic2/Topic2.html Okay, we are not going to agree with one another. Where do we go from here. I don't know about you, but go in circle makes me dizzy. I think we are going to have to agree to disagree, gentleman. I will leave now, good bye.

REPLY: No No No, More tilt doesn't mean warmer summers, it means certain areas of this planet will experience summer like conditions in winter. In this instance the sun never changes positions, its the earth that changing positions, sir. REPLY: You wrong on so many levels I don't know where to began. Maybe you are not using proper terminology? (1). A 26 degree shift would not alter the sun arc across the sky, sir. Lame is right the right terminology. (2). I agree with the people that post this website, but if you disagree then that's fine, sir. .http://www.divulgence.net/[/size] And a 26 degree shift will not alter the sun's equinox and solstice, Gzzzzz. With all do respect, I disagree with analysis.

The website you post is a poorly illustrated. i disagree with many of its illustrations. Let's keep it simple, so I'll understand better. Look at the illustrations on the website below, it better illustrates seasonal changes of the earth. Both hemispheres receives light, but only receives direct solar radiation. http://www.windows2universe.org/earth/climate/cli_seasons.html Use your mental visualization, and the website I posted to see what I'm saying. When its summer in the southern hemisphere, its winter in the northern hemisphere, and the northern hemisphere is facing away from the sun. Now, if the north pole moves an addition 26 degrees toward the sun the southern part of the northern hemisphere will receive direct solar radiation, causing the winters in this region to experience spring, and summer like conditions, do you understand? When it summer in the northern hemisphere, and the sun is use to determine if the earth's axis moved an addition 26 degrees an astronomer wouldn't have to make dramatic adjustments to his telescope, because the sun it so large, or for the skies at night, because the skies are, so large. And in the scheme of things 26 degree additional shift of the earth axis is not dramatic. From your position on earth you have a view of the sky that spans for hundreds of thousands of light year in many directions. A small shift in the earth's axis will not mis-align your view of the north star, nor would this small shift would stop other stars from circling it, In my humble opinion.

Because the sun is so large, and the earth is so close that a few degree will not mis-align the sun in relation to the earth, or any structure. The shifting of the earth effects the seasons. Look for seasonal deviations, like unusual warm winters.

One gentlemen ask you a similar question. He ask, " If the earth has shifted on it axis, then why is the sun still directly over head". REPLY; You all forget the sun is hundreds of millions of times larger, than earth a few degree movement, or a thousand mile movement of earth is not going to real register where the sun is concern, you need to find a smaller object in the sky. This 26 degree additional shift in earth's axis effect the seasons. Look for seasonal deviation in the climate. The 26 degree shift in earth axis has expose the southern part of the northern hemisphere to the sun, and the winters here are warm, and sunny. the earth is too large to use as a marker. a 26 degree shift will still expose your area to the sun. Well, good for you. Gentlemen, The sun is hundred of millions of times larger, than earth a few degrees will not alter its radiation in any manner. You must find a smaller marker to guage any deviation in earth orbit. If you are using the enormous sun as a gauge to monitor orbital deviations, then no 26 degree shift will not make a difference with the sun in relation with earth. And I fail to see any relevance in your video.

joeman, your sources are extremely questionable and biased. In the Speculations section, you're obligated to address questions put to you and you must provide supportive evidence for the assertions you're making. So far, you're not fulfilling your obligations. REPLY: I CAN PROVE SCIENTIFIC ACCOUNTS, AFTER ACCOUNT THAT GREENHOUSE GASES IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR GLOBAL WARMING, WANT TO SEE MY EVIDENCE, OR THE TRUTH DOESN'T INTEREST YOU? MY VIEWS ON EVOLUTION ARE FACTS. HUMAN, AND ANIMALS HAVE SIMILAR GENES, BECAUSE THOSE GENES ARE NEEDED TO BREATHE THE AIR, DRINK THE WATER, AND EAT THE VEGETATION ON THIS PARTICULAR PLANET, NOT BECAUSE ANIMALS, AND HUMANS EVOLVE FROM ONE ANOTHER, AND THAT'S A FACT. AS FAR AS I'M CONCERN THE MATTER IS CLOSED.

Coupled with your thread on evolution, I can only agree that you're not being serious, and any discussion would be utterly pointless REPLY: You all closed it without debate. I express my views on other group, and you'll be surprise on how many people agree with me. Its childish to close a thread on the ground the moderator disagree with it. You may not agree, but other may agree, don't their views count, or only the view of the moderator count? the whole thing is just silly, and childish. It remind my of a little boy playing in a sands box, and he want let the other children play with his toy, because they don't agree with him, really could you get anymore silly. Oh, its not about banging anyone's head if anyone disagree, then simply don't respond

The website below supports my views, and my observation of the weather in the southern part of the northern hemisphere tell me this region of the planet has tilted towards the sun, and is exposed to it. I find the website below to be valid. If you all don't agree you can block this thread like the the other thread, I don't care life goes on. http://www.divulgence.net/ P.S. You all can't deny the other anomalies.

Okay, you still don't get it. I'll try to make it as elementary as possible. IN this instance it not important how far the axis has moved. What's important in this instance is when you add the additional 26 degree shift in earth's axis with the other anomalies it suggest earth's orbit around the sun is destabilizing, sir. The normal position of the earth's axis was 23.5 degrees, and now it has moved to 49.5 degrees, and that a difference of 26 degree, which is about a thousand mile, or so increase from its original position. You made it clear you don't agree with the evidence, I appreciate your time, sir. I fail to see the relationship stone hinge has with global warming? And be careful carbon dating is not an exact science. Carbon dating is based in conjecture.

Man did not evolve from fish, and apes, and it a ridiculous notion. You people that believe in this non-sense should be ashamed of yourself. when you order fish you are eating your relative, and don't you feel bad to see your relative in a zoo locked behind bars? Maybe you people are animals, after all. Let get one thing clear there's three life forms on this planet human, animal, and plants. The one, and only thing human, animals, and plants have in common, we are all from the same planet, period. The reason human, and animals share the same genes, and / or DNA, because we are from the same planet. and that is as close as we will never get to animals. The genes, and DNA human, and animal have are compatible to this particular planet. and these genes, and DNA can't be use any where else, and they are tailored to this planet. These particular genes, and DNA allow humans, animals, and plant to breathe the same air, drink the same water, and eat some of the same vegetation without being poisoned. That's why humans, and animals share the some of the same genes, and DNA, We are from the same planet, not because we are related. Pigs are similar to humans in any way, maybe we evolve from pigs, using Darwin's analogy?

NASA discovered this anomaly, they report the earth magnetic field is reversing at 40 km per year. If you focus on my point that the earth magnetic field is moving 40 km per year, you would had realize everything else is in consequential. Wiith all due respect pointing out a difference of a few miles in this instance is a waste of my time, sir. This is the equivalent of child's play. Magnetic north pole and rotational axis are two very, very, very, very, very, very different things. REPLY: I'm aware of this, and your point is? "axis" is not mentioned in that article.Not once. REPLY: No the article doesn't directly mention the 26 degree shift, but I believe that the earth magnetic field moves as the earth's axis moves. And the chandler's wobble has moved from 1909 thru 2001 as a result of the axis moving. i believe these anomaly are indicators of the additional 26 degree shift in Earth's axis. This is all the scientific evidence I have for how. Even if you reject this evidence you certainly can't deny the other anomalies I point out. (A). http://divulgence.net/axis%20shift%202.html (B). http://www.columbia.edu/itc/ldeo/v1011x-1/jcm/Topic2/Topic2.html. See Topic: 2.3 polar motion 19091-2001: ©. http://www.technologyreview.com/view/415093/earths-chandler-wobble-changed-dramatically-in-2005/ (D). http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/29dec_magneticfield.html

Its because they believe greenhouse gases is the caused for global warming. They are set in their ways. This is a battle for the lives of everyone on this planet. One side is saying global warming is caused by greenhouse gases, and the other side is saying global warming is caused by the earth's orbit around the sun destabilizing. One thing you better understand if I lose everyone loses in the future. All of the anomalies I outline are insignificant, but together they form a pattern of orbital destabilization. These anomalies are in the beginning stages, but they will get slowly, and progressively worse. I don't know why people talk to me as if global warming is suppose to end all life on this planet over night. It will be a slow, and gradual process, thank goodness.

These conditions are accelerating. The destabilization of the earth's orbit is caused by the core of the earth cooling, and this due to the decrease in hydrocarbon flowing into the lower mantle. The flow of hydrocarbons, and the rotation of the earth is the main components of earth molten activity in it outer core. The outer core heats the inner core, and the inner core generates earth magnetic field. I thank you for the correction. My point is that earth magnetic field is moving, and it coincide with the additional 26 degree shift in the earth's axis. Try to focus on the important points. Don't take this the wrong way, but people will have more respect for you, and take you more seriously, if you don't major in the minor, sir. Which, part of my scientific evidence you disagree with? If you say all of it, than I'm not the joker here.

(1). it has been notice by many people, sir. The earth magnetic field weakening by 10%, the earth developing a breach in its magnetic field, the earth magnetic field reversing at 40 miles per year, etc has been notice by others. I been in involved with global warming since July-1983, and I been say that the earth's orbit around the sun is decaying, and/or destabilizing for 29 year, I use these anomalies to prove my point. (2). The weakening of earth's magnetic field is not a historical event. The earth magnetic field is generated by earth core. The high temperature in earth's core is sustained hydrocarbons e.g crude oil, and natural gas. The pathways of an oil, and gas well (earth fuel system) expands from the upper crust to the lower mantle, and the path of a volcano expands from the lower mantle to the the surface of earth. The core is not receiving the oil, and natural gas it once did, due to the oil, and natural gas extraction process used by the oil companies.. As a result the core is cooling, as the core cools the earth magnetic field weakens. The high temperature in the core is not supported by a nuclear geodynamo process. There is no nuclear materials strong enough to generates the high temperatures in the outer core only extremely lower levels of benign radioactive materials are discharged for volcanoes. High levels of hydrocarbon by-product are discharge, and large quantities of hydrocarbons are being combusted in the lower mantle, and outer core. Geochemistry: Hot heads and cold tails Nicholas Arndt Nature 407, 458-461(28 September 2000) doi:10.1038/35035176 The principal components of volcanic gases are hydro carbon by-product. water vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur either as sulfur dioxide (SO2) (high-temperature volcanic gases) or hydrogen sulfide (H2S) (low-temperature volcanic gases), nitrogen, argon, helium, neon, methane, carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Other compounds detected in volcanic gases are oxygen (meteoric), hydrogen chloride, hydrogen fluoride,hydrogen bromide, nitrogen oxide (NOx), sulfur hexafluoride, carbonyl sulfide, and organic compounds. Exotic trace compounds includemethylmercury, halocarbons (including CFCs), and halogen oxide radicals. The materials, and gases ejected from volcanoes suggest that large qualities of hydrocarbons (O&G) are being ignited in the lower mantle. Its the high temperatures, and high pressures, and earth's rotation that plays a role in generating earth's magnetic field. If you disagree with this blog explain to me what the purpose for petroleum (O&G). (3). The additional 26 degree shift in earth's axis is effecting the seasons. the winter here in Houston, Texas is sunny, and warmer, 50 years ago it was bitterly cold, and its altering the chandler's wobble, and Its the reason the earth magnetic field is moving, or reversing 40 miles per year. http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/29dec_magneticfield/ Merrill, Ronald T.; McElhinny, Michael W.; McFadden, Phillip L. (1996). "Chapter 8". The magnetic field of the earth: paleomagnetism, the core, and the deep mantle. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-491246-5. World Data Center for Geomagnetism, Kyoto. "Magnetic North, Geomagnetic and Magnetic Poles". Retrieved 2012-07-03. North Magnetic Pole Moving East Due to Core Flux, National Geographic, December 24, 2009 (4). What evidence do you have that the sun is getting nearer? If it is,why does the moon still manage to block out the sun during a solar eclipse? REPLY: either the sun is growing in intensity, or the earth is slowly moving towards it. Due all calculations involving Greenhouse gas the actual temperature was never measured. The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that many authors trace back to the traditional works of Fourier (1824), Tyndall (1861), and Arrhenius (1896), and which is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively equilibrate to the atmospheric system. Ac- cording to the second law of thermodynamics such a planetary machine can never exist. Nevertheless, in almost all texts of global climatology and in a widespread secondary literature it is taken for granted that such mechanism is real and stands on a rm sci- entifc foundation. In this paper the popular conjecture is analyzed and the underlying physical principles are clarified. By showing that (a) there are no common physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious atmospheric green- house effects, (b) there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature of a planet, © the frequently mentioned difference of 33 C is a meaningless number calculated wrongly, (d) the formulas of cavity radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the assumption of a radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to zero, the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsified. Electronic version of an article published as International Journal of Modern Physics B, Vol. 23, No. 3 (2009) 275{364 , DOI No: 10.1142/S021797920904984X, c World Scientific Publishing Company, http://www.worldscinet.com/ijmpb. Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway (2010). Merchants of Doubt, Bloomsbury Press, pp. 8-9. Proceedings of theInternational Astronomical Union / Volume 2004 /Issue IAUS223 / June 2004, pp 605-606 Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor (ACRIM) solar irradiance monitoring 1978 to present (Satellite observations of total solar irradiance); access date 2012-02-03 Ineson S., Scaife A.A., Knight J.R., Manners J.C., Dunstone N.J., Gray L.J., Haigh J.D. (9 October 2011). "Solar forcing of winter climate variability in the Northern Hemisphere". Nature Geoscience 4 (11): 753–7. Bibcode 2011NatGe...4..753I. doi:10.1038/ngeo1282 "Russian academicsays CO2 not to blame for global warming". Russian InternationalNews Agency. 15 January 2007. Retrieved 24 August 2012. "Global warming results not from the emission of greenhouse gases [...], but from an unusuallyhigh level of solar radiation and [...] growth in its intensity." (5). Oil and natural gas are not formed in the core? What makes you think they are? REPLY: I never say that sir. I said hydrocarbon are being ignited in the lower mantle. The lower mantle heats the outer core, and the outer core heats the inner core, and the inner core generates the earth's magnetic field. The rotation of the planet also play a role in sustaining the molten activity in the outer core. Keep in mind one of the components of hydrocarbon, and its by-product is oxygen, so the ignition of hydrocarbons are possible in the lower mantle. Volcanic discharges suggest large quantities of hydrocarbons by-product are being ignited in the lower mantle. Geochemistry: Hot heads and cold tails Nicholas Arndt Nature 407, 458-461(28 September 2000) doi:10.1038/35035176 The principal components of volcanic gases are water vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur either as sulfur dioxide (SO2) (high-temperature volcanic gases) or hydrogen sulfide (H2S) (low-temperature volcanic gases), nitrogen, argon, helium, neon, methane, carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Other compounds detected in volcanic gases are oxygen (meteoric), hydrogen chloride, hydrogen fluoride,hydrogen bromide, nitrogen oxide (NOx), sulfur hexafluoride, carbonyl sulfide, and organic compounds. Exotic trace compounds includemethylmercury, halocarbons (including CFCs), and halogen oxide radicals. Okay here's the direct evidence. The 26 degree shift in earth's axis coincides with the earth's magnetic field moving at 40 miles per year. http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/29dec_magneticfield/ Okay here's the direct evidence. The 26 degree shift in earth's axis coincides with the earth's magnetic field moving at 40 miles per year. http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/29dec_magneticfield/