JrPahoodneyMan

I'd say to narrow down the ideas, ask a physics professor, as they know the classes you need, and then go for it.

Time may be an effect of gravity. The further you get away from gravity's pull, the slower time goes.

Adapting to artificial heating means losing fur over generations. You see, Humans are adapting to artificial heating by losing hair. Artificial heating is at a universal level, which means animals and humans no longer need hair or fur, so eventually they shed it and are thus evolved to fit their new environment. This is what I mean. And the smaller the object producing the gravity, the less potent it is. You can tell by the difference of potency between Earth and the moon. Adapting to artificial lighting and artificial gravity are not an issue. They will become, if the artificial gravity is invented, an inevitability. Humans are likely to adapt if the technology is invented and we travel into space.

Yes there is a great chance that animals will adapt to space, and minds change, but don't evolve, but the thing is, not all animals shed all their fur, and in space, they would also need to change to being smaller and adapt to artificial heating. As mass of the body changes to adapt to less potent gravity, it likely gets smaller because it won't need as much mass to support it. Yes, the chances of things getting ugly is a chance, too. There is also a chance that everyone in the distant future may look the same and just not be attractive. Look at the idea of aliens. That is the image that I think of when I say evolved-looking human form, this is why I came up with my speculation, and I hope that is understandable. Many UFO sightings have been reported, as you see on some other people's posts, and there is a great chance that humans are the only ones capable of harnessing technology, that chance being if they are real and are human. I am not trying to be strange in any way, just speculating, as is the norm. But seriously, think very deeply about this. The chances are high.

I wouldn't say that just because the core might be solid, that it was constructed. It may have been a natural solid more dense and more capable of withstanding heat, so I wouldn't know if it is exactly natural or produced. I am just making a guess with my speculations, just as all theories start out as a speculation. And I am not saying that individuals evolve, but their minds do as they learn. The physical bodies do evolve over generations, I know that, and I accept that. I am just making a guess at what humans' next evolutionary traits might be in the distant future. I see now that animals do evolve. But how much is the real question. There is a capacity limit on evolution, population, an much more. I just want to learn how far creatures evolve. And if we do make it to space, I am not sure if animals can come with us. What if they can't adapt and survive? The reason for my question is because, as you say, we have become more adaptable. Animals might not be able to adapt to space, because their genes might not change quite as quickly. I'm not saying they won't adapt to space, though. And eventually humans might have to adapt to artificial gravity and artificial lighting. The sun has been unstable for hundreds of thousands of years, according to experts. It could explode into a red giant at a moment's notice. And another reasoning for my speculation on the possibility of the universe being artificial, what keeps the sun hot after it collapses from a red giant into a white dwarf?

Well, you pose an interesting point. Here's my speculation on the matter. If you observe the crust, atmosphere, and waters of the Earth, solid moves both water and gas. So, could it be that there has to be a solid in the center of the Earth moving the magma in convection currents? I do know that the mind and body of humans evolve, but I've never really seen animals evolve. I've seen their breeds mix, and there are quite a few mixed breeds that get cancer and many other physical problems. There may be a limit to breeding that doesn't allow animals to be intellectual in the same way as humans. Therefore, animals might or might not fully evolve. Some are getting mutations that are not healthy. I do not know how far animals will adapt. I do acknowledge that evolution exists, but it may be very limited for animals, maybe to where they just adapt to earthen environments. Think about it and reply when you can.

Thing is, I just want to say that sure there is a lot of evidence, I will not deny that evolution may be a fact, but I cannot call it an absolute truth either. For Creationism and Evolution theories, and now my Construction speculation now exist, we cannot deny any one of them. All three of them may even exist as a truth in some way I would not understand, and I wouldn't even know it. We do not know everything about the physical universe, but we are destined to figure it out. Even if many of my speculations are proven, it does not disprove nor prove evolution. You see, we have genetic construction, and we have the possibility of energy cores and artificial gravity, which we have not yet figured out. Is this enough to say we cannon yet disprove the possibility that the Earth may indeed be artificial, and that maybe the first species' gametes were constructed, and maybe the gametes of the first two of every species were constructed, even humans. But I cannot disprove or prove anything until I get an education in the fields that cover my speculations, get a job in those fields, and there may be a different future than what I see. I don't know, nor does anyone else know, the exact extent of the universe and its basis for understanding and knowledge. If you wish to know more about my speculations, view my other topic Unknown Theories, which, by now, part of it may have been changed to speculation and/or hypothesis.

Well, I would need every application of the word "theory" changed into "speculation" and/or "hypothesis." This may make a significant difference. I wouldn't know the exact extent of how to do that, but I'm sure you know a lot more about it!

Well, I know I don't fully understand what a "Theory" is, but I call them that just as a title. It's more of a speculation and hypothesis. I wish I could redo the title, but it's already made. I know I need to reply, but I am in college, so it may take me time to get around to it, and sometimes I forget. Yes they are just speculation and hypothesis so far, but if I or someone else can test them (and I think this may be what makes something a theory) then they might become a theory.

Well, I am just using it as part of a speculation, saying that if there were a God, and he provided an evolution, it may be limited to humans, and no one can prove the Bible to be a Fairy Tale. After all, no one religion has been absolutely proven to be true or false. I can't prove or disprove the full theory of evolution. I am just giving my speculations, and a hypothesis of how mankind might evolve in the future. You see, I may be a Christian, and my understanding of things is connected to my beliefs. But science can indeed be its own thing. I have no clue if God did give us a science to go with the physical universe I believe He created. The thing is, I have a speculation that the universe is artificial, and if it is, it may indeed prove this speculation that evolution is indeed limited, but I wouldn't know exactly how limited. But the only way to prove that is if I prove my energy core speculation and hypothesis, which is for unlimited material production from what I believe dark matter is, and for unlimited energy for electronics. And I would have to prove my artificial gravity speculation/hypothesis. If I am able to test my speculations and prove my hypothesis, if, of course, I am able to become a physicist one day and do those exact things, they may then become real theories.

Thing is, if the dome part of the UFO has two layers, one outer layer being glass, and the other being an unknown element, trapping ozone gas between them would allow a vehicle to "glow."

You can also view my Unknown Theories Cont. page. I think that it needs to be moved too. The reasoning for my Energy Cores theory is that Electrons always produce heat. When they interact with the protons in hydrogen in the air contained by the bulb, they cause the protons to have an overload of heat energy and they have to release the energy as light. This may be true for the metal coils in light bulbs. Now, anti protons also produce significant heat, although I think anti particles are much smaller, so in my mind, they don't produce as much heat as an electron. Thus as a positron steals some of the heat produced by the anti proton, causing it to produce light because of an overload of heat energy. Since not all heat is taken by the positrons, the excess heat in anti matter can build up, thus anti matter can be hot and bright. Combine an anti proton and electron, and they may produce enough heat as one unit to start producing unlimited amounts of electrons. When it comes to the positive core, the positrons require less heat to vibrate than protons, thus they are an energy particle, and the proton is an orbit basis particle. For electrons and anti protons, anti protons do not produce enough heat to be energy particles, thus they are an orbit basis particle. Electrons are large enough to produce enough heat to be an active energy particle. Combine positrons and protons, and they may steal enough heat, readily and steadily enough, that it produces unlimited amounts of positrons. In the neutral between antimatter and matter theory, skip the second time I put down the word magnetic. It was a mistake.

Time is probably an effect of gravity. The further you get from the Earth, the slower time is.

Maybe the vehicles are atmospheric and reverse gravity propelled, and it could be piloted by evolved humans that came before our Earth.

The Partial Evolution Theory I think that only humans evolve. This I say because if you look at the Bible, one of the highest treasures of the Christian religion, it says in one verse something like "every animal to its own kind." Now think you think about it, what if this applies to evolution itself? Did God give us an evolution only obtainable through the human form? Anyways, if you mix all of the human gene pools, you will probably get a grey skin tone. If you give people foods that don't require chewing, eventually they will adapt to where they don't have teeth anymore. If they get used to artificial gravity, their bodies will get smaller because they don't need a much mass to hold them up. And the human head keeps getting bigger. And with only artificial lighting, their eyes will get bigger. So, big-headed, grey-skinned, big-eyed, small-bodied humans. Think about it.

Energy Cores Colliding electrons to anti protons at the highest speed of the anti proton to produce a negative energy core. Energy core should produce unlimited amount of electrons. Colliding positrons to protons at the highest speed of the proton to produce a positive energy core. Energy core should produce unlimited amount of positrons. Neutral Between Antimatter and Matter Send 8 anti neutrons at the speed of light toward a neutron that is in a spherical magnetic particle magnetic stasis field. Then send 24 anti protons at the anti neutrons and 6 protons at the neutron. Now you have what can make an indestructible material completely made of nuclei. Add 24 positrons and 6 electrons partially orbiting the nuclei, and you have a material that, when bent and released, will snap back into its original position. My Artificial Gravity Theory Spin a pull between two or more positronic magnets of the opposite magnetic polarization. My Reverse Gravity Theory Spin a push between two curvy ring-shaped positronic magnets of the same magnetic polarization. Antimatter the Answer to Needs for Technology Anti matter may be more potent in fuel because, in fact, it may be significantly smaller than matter, even though its shine makes it appear nearly as large. You see, in matter, electrons produce heat and the protons steal all of it. In antimatter, anti protons give off heat, and the positrons can only steal some of it. And when the positrons steal enough heat, they produce light. Thus anti matter would glow very brightly and produce significant levels of heat. If antimatter is smaller, then we have a way to make anti matter into superconductors and denser alloys. My Theory of: What Dark Matter is and How to Obtain FTL Speeds I believe dark matter is translucent (new, mad up definition of translucent meaning you can pass through it) and transparent (new, made up definition meaning you can't see it, but you can see through it), hollow, spherical shells. The size that can be made solid if there's energy inside it is the size of particles and antiparticles. The size available only when there is an object, such as a positron or electron, moving at somewhat high velocities around nuclei. Then there would be a size that can only be activated by a large object moving at the speed of light, whether spinning at that speed, or traveling at that speed. If it becomes activated by something traveling at that speed, it translucifies (meaning made translucent) and transparifies (meaning made transparent) the object, thus the object can now move at speeds faster than that of light. The Construction Theory If you observe the Earth, solid moves both liquid and gas. This is why I believe the Earth is artificial. What I think is that if the earth is artificial, then there were Humans before our Earth that built it. If I can prove my energy core and artificial gravity theories, it should be proof enough that the Earth, sun, and moon are artificial.