Relative

Yes I think the bodily fluid part lead me to believe that. You say there is pressure but very very low, which I would expect in a huge expansion. To have pressure, do we not have to have containment? the act of preventing the spread of something

In space, is there a physical pressure? http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2002/MimiZheng.shtml Is this link accurate? If in space, sweat can not even escape a human body, which is a physical pressurised body , which has acting force on the sweat to force out of the human body, why can sweat not escape? unless there is greater pressure? It does not make sense to me I can not understand why is it not P=F/E? And is it so hot in space, in sunlight, because there is no thermal barrier i.e Earth's atmosphere to protect you?

Hello, like on most science forums , I am unable to find an ask questions section. I presume this section is it. I am trying hard to see current science the way it says things are, but I can just not see it. If I only ask questions, then hopefully, no one will ask for maths, that I see has irrelevant when it is about thought. My first question, is this the right place for questions?

The whole point is, how can you say the universe is x amount of age etc etc, when science clearly just make thinks up and invents thinks, how can you say the blah blah clock, a second on that is a second? Time as we record it is nothing more than a diary , or drawing x's on a jail war, it doe snot tell you the age of the universe or the planet. At least you understand it Strange, and my calculator must have rounded it up lol, equivalent is the same as equal, but I would go with that.

Thank you great link , but when I provided the maths , that fits, fallacy is over ruled. 1 second is equal to 0.288 mile at 1000 mph there can be no argument, This was the origin of science, 360 degrees, 3600 seconds and so on, Obviously the mentally of history was rather different than today,

yes exactly subdivisions of 24 hours that is equal to distance rotated, and velocity. Without travelling distance and velocity there would be no clock from that time, the sun dial relied on movement, movement meaning distance travelled and velocity.

Not quite , that is because you are defining their distance of a second the same has yours, our second would be 0.288 mile, their second would be a greater distance or lesser distance depending on circumference and velocity. do u see now what I am getting at? But the second was invented before our time, a second is an invention by origination using distance/velocity and the second has only changed its colour, it is still a second therefore still the same thing from the origin.

and a second is also based on velocity. 60

and time is also based on velocity... is this a trick question, 60 minutes

And yes I do scratch my head when I considered time, I am not a looney, it has boggled my head too. I know you do not understand me , if I placed a stick in the ground on earth, and it the stick did one rotation back to its starting point, it would take 24 hours. If I put a stick on a different planet, it will take 48hrs for example. So there second is twice our second, the distance would be different, that the stick moved, in one second, science says we dictate the universe and our way is it. A second was derived by distance, it is not arguable , it is history, I am correct ,

where do you get a foot from? well we spin anti clockwise and orbit the sun anti clockwise, it is not hard to see we go backwards and forwards in the day My clock says 13.28 , I bet the new clock says the same.

and tim eis equal to distance actually at first they did not know that the velocity of the earth changed, that is why they changed it to the new clock, but the second regardless originated by distance, your new second is the same has a clock second, so there really is a paradox.

So if the earth was at a set velocity and not changing it would be I believe 0.288 mile per second? the earth does not rotate quicker at night but we move quicker, because we are travelling forward at night around the eliptic of the sun. Where as day we travel backwards opposite to the forward although we still go forward, we do go backwards and forwards in the day.

Yes , but you have not flawed my logic in any sense, or physical process that says I am wrong. It is unarguable. Time is derived by distance which is not good. I will ask you a question, 1 second on the new clock is equal to how much rotation of the Earth when Using the Sun has a marker?

I will ask you a question, 1 second on the new clock is equal to how much rotation of the Earth when Using the Sun has a marker?

I know that and all good if your new clock was not based on the same second which we can trace back to been the same value as distance. ''This is the same method you are mentally using to tell time with a sundial or the sun directly. As you can see the distance units cancel out.'' No they dont cancel out it is still distance.

It was accident in history, they never considered what they were doing, it was bad science , and you were all taught this to be accurate and true so why would you consider it. It fits, it works, I shown the maths, but of cause I proved it and it still does not matter. still 1 second is equal to 0.288 mile A second is not based on distance because you simply did not know it was, know one ever considered this before and excepted time for granted, when the conclusion is 0.288 mile, history messed up and did not know it. A si second is the same as a second on a clock which was derived from a sun dial which is based on shadow movement which is distance. And it is equal to 0.288 mile. And I have already done my own arguments logically against myself, and I can not flaw the logic in my own assumption.

And I rest my case on this thread with about all the evidence I need, science is stereotyping science, and thinking and ideas is not allowed any more, I have just give you some of the best logic you will ever see in your time, critical thinking that gets answers, the obvious logic, and the result, no doubt you want maths, no maxwell's on here then. Why have a forum in the first place if all thats going to get quoted , is our way all the highway? Have I offended anyone or used foul language? Have I learnt a few new things? yes. Next post factual - so I copy and paste wiki, my post are factual, logically using your own physical processes. You can not have a vacuum without containment. FACT FACT FACT A second does equal 0.288 mile the way it was invented - fact Even agreed with it was invented. OK, looks like i will get banned from here also for telling reality how it is and not inventing it like science has, I guess the truth hurts....

Yes but I know you dont understand the 1 second lines , so had to mention aliens sorry. Each line would represent the different distance over 1 second, so neither second would be correct. How can that not matter? even when considering time on a sun dial, at night I am travelling quicker than in the day, this must mean something....

This is the nothing how it all began, and my logic gives only two options. To create anything out of nothing there has to be isotropic centripetal pressure or else nothing will happen........... That leaves only one logical explanation , containment, We are contained. 1. We live inside a black hole which the maths fits us exactly into. 2. We live in a plasm generator, that was created, and we are all nothing more than nuclear waste. and this is the problem you lock it before you hear me out proper, maths can not explain what I am saying, it is critical thinking, lateral thinking, that is your science not mine, so you are now saying I am not allowed to use critical thinking in science, you want to lock your own science away, that is ironic, dont please, look what Im saying, understand it please. The stars get their energy from the stars , the proton-proton chain is the red dwarf vacuum cleaners, feeding each other, everything else is space dust, that makes matter through fusion process. A cooling star, could attract a surface layer of matter, that cools and becomes a physical body with a central core that will always stay warm, because it still gets fed its energy.

Or maybe you not understand me, have you ever considered that possibility? Regardless , you can not measure time by the way it was done, using distance. It all starts with the second that is equal to 0.288 mile, the aliens second may be equal to 1.2mile. Because you both invented time by error of process. Negative energy, no energy, a nothing, blackness. 100% viable logic. The stars make light, before stars there had to be blackness because there was nothing to make light. Energy comes from the stars so that means neither was there energy.

Well it would not matter if you and the alien and giant all agreed on the unit values, but because you all based time on circular motion , none of you would still be correct. What units of time would I consider to be correct? That is the universal question, that I am looking for the answer too. Time is decay, but then again decaying properties of different matter is different so again an inaccurate value. To be honest I would have to debate about the nothing, and before the big bang, which is timeless negative space.

Neither are correct, because it is made up, to fit humanity. If you was travelling in co-moving frames with my giant, you would have to travel 44 miles before my giant had to move, he is there before you started your journey, velocity to the giant is different than velocity to you. Distance perspective, all perspective is different to the giant, An alien would argue that they are correct and you are incorrect, because of the way the second was derived. So if there is an uncertainty principle, to me that means garbage and gibberish. To age the universe and get a true account of time, you just simply need to rewind the big bang..... providing there was a big bang, which again I am a bit jubious about.

I presume you have just give the same measurements for each in different terms. My question how are you measuring this, by using time? a giant tape measure? My alien may argue that it is only 22 miles depending where he lives. Because his mph would be different to yours, because his second is different. The example you are explaining is only relative to us, this will not tell you the age of the universe. And my alien is a giant, his feet are 44 miles in length, distance is relative to size. Have you ever considered that it is not the universe that is big, but us that are really small?

Today the standard SI unit is s second and is defined as "the duration of 9192631770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom". Which is has near to a second on a clock as science could get, you changed the colour of the clock thats all. ''We have picked different base units to use, no big issue.'' Really?, the issue would be that neither you or the alien were correct about time, their second would be a longer second than your second or shorter depending on distance to the sun. What I see is time is distance according to how science originated time. It does not work.