Relative

Ok, I am glad you mentioned the doppler, red caused by the energy level been weakened by opposite direction momentum, and vice versus, energy increasing in direction towards the source, EMR pressure increase and decrease, caused by direction. feedback on the conduit..

The distant stars at night , giving us infa red vision. If I had to try and explain it science wise I would say, that each Photon starts its journey in the wave at the same energy level, as they gain distance from the source their energy weakens, BUT, with been in constant contact with the source through connectivity of a Photon conduit, the energy never completely dies, and can easily be recharged by physical momentum, or ionization etc.

Black body radiation the sun, extending to faint red shift, the black walls of space, we are in the green zone.radiation levels show you this, maybe not green, but can you see what I am saying? not photons energy

Cognitive ok, take a foam sphere, and have a load of knitting needles, place all the knitting needles into the sphere, side by side until there is no room left, you only extend the sphere. light travels straight, think about it, it is just an extension, no gaps , still connected to source.

I understand the inverse square law, and it can not apply, light and radiation, been of the same, do not scatter and spread at distance, it only weakens. It is still a solid state and still in contact with the source, it red shifts at distance so bad, we only see black.

There can be no inverse square law to light. all the space is filled always. yes in all directions directional to light source shape always. like the black and white static dots on a tv, white been the energy , black been the nothing space....

I am best at cognitive thinking so will try to explain that way to try to get you see it, - imagine you are on the suns surface, you leave to travel to earth, has soon as you depart, another person departs almost instantly behind you, eventually you get to earth, but behind you is a que,so from you to the sun is a connection.

I will show you that light has no speed, it is not what you think. The constant speed of light is not a constant, light slows down in a medium etc. You will find that C is no more than speed of emittance. The energy from the sun, emr, flows, it is speed of flow. Here we go again, why do you all who have been programmed by books come back with, blah blah? everything has a different viscosity of energy compared to transparency, and transparent is the constant state of the universe. You see, a difference in energy viscosity to the transparency.

Thank you John, I know how the spectrum works, I know about wavelengths, red is weak etc etc,

Cognitive- imagine been at a central point inside a clear glass fish tank, the walls constantly expand, your position stays central. size, velocity , distance all becomes relative to the observer, and the observer, for example - replace yourself with a giant who is the size of a planet, distance perceived by the giant is different to the perceived distance by you. The speed of light, etc, is only relative to humans, what you call fast, to the giant would seem slow. I have looked at your science, and the truth is most of it is only relative, and has very little meaning in the universe. Yes, but dispersion has in , change, example- transparent, anything that is in a transparent space we see, because it is different to the constant. It is the transparency that is the constant in the Universe.

Hello , I will try something very simple for you all to understand, a shadow does not exist, a shadow, dark is the true nature of the universe, there is not night and day, the universe is always in darkness, the light you see is created. Do you not understand that we all live in the dark and your eyes adjusted to see in the dark, by the evolution adjustment to radiation? The universe is in darkness not brightness. A rainbow....... A rainbow you see the different viscosities of energy levels...

Sorry all just got visitors arrived, I will return later when my home is quieter, school holidays , children are off. I will leave you with this to ponder over. And answer your questions when I return. A single Photon is released from a light bulb at C. Then another and another and so on, spreading has in the inverse square law as the Photons gain distance from the source, however all these Photons are released, simualtaneously , going all angles and all directions at C. So at distance according to the physics of the process, the light should not dim,

You say energy does not exist by itself, because energy been often of a physical process that creates the energy. However , energy came first, energy created everything.

No not diminished, stopped, the light can not escape your window, the negative viscosity of night is greater. As for sounds, the waves are doppler affected, the louder noise forcing the lesser noise waves out of the way by stronger energy viscosity. Do you not know that maths is an invention? an invention to quantify. Maths is and was always made to fit. This can have no maths, this is reality.

And its a invisible pink Unicorn, I believe.FYI. The burden of proof, yes I am sure I have the equipment to do that up my loft, not. Well when everything stops, like the ionized layers is, because the rock we live on becomes thermodynamically equal to space, I will not say i told you so, because I will be burnt to a crisp or froze.

If light is at a constant, and continuous? Why does night stop it? So you can deny that space is not full of energy, energy been its own medium with its own viscosities? The red dwarfs filled space , the entire universe with energy.

And I would reply by saying science is been arrogant for not listening, I may be wrong, I may be right, but is it not duty has a scientist to try to understand? suppose I am right, do you want to wait 15 years like faraday when today is current?

I apologise Strange, my English literature has improved from two year ago.Light has a constant speed, the Einstein part, and continues constant in travel.

I truly thank you for your time, I am not arrogant but verbally common, straight to the point, and I can only explain things how I can describe it. The mindset is often of a troll bored nature from most, however I have studied and do know quite a bit about current science. However wording something that is new is not easy . I have a good IQ and I am been genuine, what I talk about I have learnt from current science and do not see it how current say it is. I am trying hard to convey what I am on about, and if you continue the conversation I am sure I will convey it properly. You are science, you are the people I need to come to. I am not arrogant, it will be science that puts what I say into understandable context. Because it is you , science that will gain from this and the only possible people who will understand it.... My eyes do not lie, the glass is more reflective at night, I can clearly see my image, what I am saying is what happens.

In another words the negative of night holds the light in place that is trying to escape your window, this makes the glass become reflective. The light bounces back more. hence reflection I truly understand what you are saying about the maths, the maths is irrellavent, I am a begiiner to science compared to you guys, but my ideas have logical merit and I know the definition of a troll, I am not . I can see something, and you guys really need to listen and try to understand what Im saying although it may not be worded greatly. and also you will find that maths is made to fit....

Interesting that the world of science does not think that there is more to viscosity. Yes maybe I am altering the definition of viscosity slightly, but if you could see my vision of the Universe works, I truly think you would be intrigued. Someone mentioned space has nothing, that is completely false, space is made up of energy, and different energies. Everything that exists, and everything you think does not exist, i.e. a medium in space, I am sorry to tell you science truly has that wrong. Everything, all , is energy , even bodyless space. Space contains clumps of energy, where there is no physical bodies or entities, there is still energy, there is not nothing and never was. Ether theory wrong, energy theory correct, We see different viscosities of energy, whether matter or gaseous clouds. Consider your window, consider night and day, consider why your window pain becomes more reflective at night, this is because the outside has more negative viscosity than the positive inside your room from your bulb. Consider light suppose to be a constant, so why does the light from my room not continue and light up the street, because the positive is lost in the negative. Do you not see this, look , open your eyes ,

When considering viscosity, we often associate viscosity with fluids, and the differences proceeding the mixing of fluids, example the viscosity of oil to water, the oil will not mix with the water, because it has a different viscosity. However, if we consider other elements , such as air, the general atmosphere, space, emr, there is also pause for thought to consider, that these also have a viscosity. Example , energy, lightning has a higher energy level than the surrounding energy, the energy has a different viscosity, so we see lightning, by a difference in viscosity of the energies. Weather , the difference in energies of hot and cold, pressure fronts, different energies unable to join, making weather patterns. Cold and hot is two different viscosities. Night and day!, It is day ere, I can clearly see out of my window into the garden. The natural light in my room, has a close viscosity to the light outside, only a windows difference, been the transparency of the glass, and the glasses minimal viscosity. However at night, the outside has a different viscosity to my light bulb on the inside, the viscosity of the outside becomes far greater than my 60w light bulb, the outside viscosity of negativeness, holds my 60w light bulb light in place, the viscosity of the glass changes, the surface becoming more reflective at night, but it does not actually become more reflective, it is the greater outer negative viscosity that slows down the lights escape rate.

Ok I can picture the solubillized Ions, like a amorphous cloud. You say that on the cells, there is a decoration on the cells, sugars and proteins, are sugar and proteins not electrolytes? If they are electrolytes, is this not solidified or sediment?

Thank you for the information, When you say cells are decorated, do you mean that electrolytes become solidified in the crevices of the membrane? Does this cause crevice friction and damage the membrane by thermodynamics, allowing RNA from the RNA cavity to come into contact with DNA? A sort of diluting of DNA causing repairing cells to split? The Hogenhaim Effect within the lympic cavities been the start of the process?

Cancer prevention - by matching the PH level in food and water to match the human bodies PH? Different acidity levels causing a failure in Nutrients and electrolytes becoming solidified. My apologies, I have just realised there is already a alkaline theory out, sorry, my idea is a bit late.