Relative

what about the torque on a Euler axis?

i think applies ''torque is the cross product of lever length and force, and angular momentum is the cross product of linear momentum and distance from an origin. ''

So you are telling me that a couple with a net force of zero can rotate anti clockwise , there is angular momentum, and torque exists although a net force of 0?

Soft science and see it with your own eyes, I tried seen things with my own eyes and my threads get closed , I have read a few of the opening posts, and no offence, you can not prove history before us, and guess work does not account for anything. I gather from the original content and argument is something to do with pyramids and the industrial process they used at the time to build them, and I read something about ramps. So what would the ramps be made of to hold vast amounts of weight each day?

Thank you for the thread link, I looked at the diagrams, got a bit lost, but noticed this sentence ''This also shows that for true equilibrium a body has be be separately in force equilibrium and in moment equilbrium.'' What do you mean by this?

Thank you for the links, I would not know what information to look for.

Yes it is. (And, once again, you have veered from asking questions to making irrational speculations.) I'm not sure if that even means anything. But you can't see the change in light unless it enters your eyes. (Because it is "transparent" remember.) Light is EMR, and ok will go back to questions. When your eyes are open is emr in continued contact with you retina?

''And if the object doesn't reflect light, then you won't be able to see it.'' yes it reflects light, but the light is not reflected into your eyes, it does not have to, you can see the energy difference through the constant state of white light, you see the difference in state?

Yes , I know this, I am not saying it does not interact, I am saying it does not need to reflect into our actual eyes off matter so we see that matter. Because we simply can see through it. if i had 5 tins of paint all different colours, and I poured them into a tub, however , if the tub was static the colors would stay seperated, and we see the different colours, i spin the tub and keep the tub spinning, the colours merge has one , I see white. I stop the tub , i see the different colours again, I need a constant V to keep spinning my colours, I maintain velocity of the spin, my colour remains a constant, any slowing down of my tub, and i start to see colours again.

Yes ok, white light, invisible, a mixture of frequencies, no, white light one frequency, the invisible is constant, the frequencies constantly modify in white light, the whole making one set frequency, it is always constant, you have to modify the constant to see the visible spectrum or send signals.?

By sending a radio wave, we send a modified wave through a sine wave? Yes thats it, the frequencies outputted been of wavelengths, several frequencies from one frequency, modified energy levels, ? By the angular momentum through a prism? angular having change although on a macroscopic level, an angular plain has greater distances.? The same has a convex rain drop? so emr has further to travel

Oh yes I see your point I am wording my questions badly again. The spectrum (mix of frequencies) is modified by absorption / reflection. and yes modified is the word, a prism modifies the output? the frequency output of a prism is different to the magnitude of input?

emr could be considered an invisible solid? the E constant at a magnitude of 0 means - the energy constant, its set magnitude, lets say 30 degrees today, to us we still see zero , we still see through it. colours are much more vivid in sunlight, the propagation is greater?

value x, modulated sight interacts with emr, I like that phrase, sounds much better than light reflects into your eyes. because emr is a continued physical motion has a wave there is no gaps?

ok you got it sort of, you can see that light is modulated by a surface, the energy of the modulation been different to the magnitude of input, the E constant at a magnitude of 0,<transparent>, been altered by propagation of emr by rate of absorbing properties or density of medium.? or refractive index, difractive index A raindrop , modulates the frequency, the magnitude of output is weaker than the magnitude of input?

modulate -to vary strength true emr contains electrons? A prism modulates emr? varies the strength of output

C is only constant, with no obstruction.? lol on the typo, So when something is in excited state, there is propagation of emr?

Yes like the north pole, light is modulated , by angle of the indecent ray , ? ''Excitation is an elevation in energy level above an arbitrary baseline energy state'' are you saying when emr makes contact with matter the above does not happen? and emr does have a force? and also a Fn.?

So you are saying that a Sine wave does not propagate in a medium? sin (2 π t) You are saying that the magnitude of input is the same has the magnitude of output?

or modulates?

as a result of force, As a result, the wave-fronts begin to bunch up, making spectrum colors? Yes I am aware how a rainbow works, a raindrop changes the amplitude of the energy of emr? There is no set frequency. It is not constant. You consider the frequency oscillates?

Emr has to go into your eyes yes, but is does not have to reflect of mass into your eyes. Take a rainbow for example, put the rainbow in the empty container with the emr, you see several changes of energy/frequency by refraction, the energy frequency surrounding the rainbow, the transparent emr, remains at a set frequency a constant.<unvariable,unchanged>? you see the rainbow because the rest of the cubic volume of emr is transparent, you simply see through it? Emr reflecting of a surface, or rather bouncing of it , propagates, the different frequencies, spectrum colors been a difference in energy

not ripples on water , i edited your post, we only see things, because emr is reflected and absorbed, a different to the constant. Ok lets look at this from a cubic container , containing water. The water is transparent, allows light to pass through. I remove the water , the cubic volume of space is still full of light, I can still see through it yes? yes or no to my containers, are all these actions transparent? if I pour a color dye into the water container, you see a difference yes? If I add a cloud to the atmosphere you see a difference? If I add dirt to the glass you see a difference? If I fire an energy through the emr you see a difference ? the visual spectrum is an energy difference?

Are photons invisible to the human eye? Is every space between your eyes and keyboard filled with photons? Can you see through the Photons? Can you see your keyboard through the photons? Is your keyboard different to the transparent ? is light reflected from your keyboard? do photons propogate on your keyboard? if photons are a mixture of frequencies, why is my keyboard a colour? My keyboard is a color because of photon propagation? what else do you call it? there is nothing else, glass is transparent i get that....it is alike been inside a block of glass but not in solid form

This thread is all emr , emr is why we see, but yes i will stick to questions, You say so called transparency of light, so science can see it?