Artorius

in what context?

broken morning=as it was dawning by my snoring

none

Knowing your usual posts which i find interesting,im not sure you worded this one as you probably meant to ophi.Are you saying that only part of the sphinx(head and shoulders) has been actually carved.Or are you saying the structure was carved from eroded natural rock.It appears to me the second however you realise your mistake with this explanation. As for global flooding,well there is a lot of literature that propose this scenario as actually happened, though i dont want to commit to saying the data is correct.

actually the film only exagerated the speed of it all,the outcome however would be similar.If which scientists already know,the gulf stream is cooled by the icecaps continually melting were screwed.

haha yes i was only joking.still why crop the link was this because you had your motorbike battery suspended from the ceiling.

okay sayanora my fault for reading your posts the wrong way,sometimes reading posts i may miss the sarcasm and see it as flaming.Could we start again buddie, Ive tried viewing the posts but cannot see any direct questions to me in 22.If you would like to ask me something go ahead and i will try to post you a factual reply.

mmm why would a creature evolve camoflauge,i dont know really i see lots of animals that use it though.It may have something to do with making them blend in with the background or something so they can remain undetected.

Post 19 gentleman please,22-23 show nothing to dispute what ive stated and are flame jobs.From now on im only replying to posters on topic and that show understanding,otherwise all it will achieve ir repetative posts.

How big is it like Ophiolite...you havent seen it have you!!! Besides looking for a creature whom itself and offspring have successfully avoided capture is by definition going to be hard.Dont sea creatures react to sonar,and instead of drawing attention to themselves by swimming off at speed dont some stay motionless or partly bury themselves.If all that sticks out from the floor is nessies humps wouldnt the sonar hit look just like a formation of boulders,i expect they've evolved some camoflage as well by now.As for the actual research and experiments on the lock they are pitifull,ive seen every documentary on the subject and i didnt even expect them to find a rusty asda trolley.

Hey YT i noticed your pictures of your LED were cropped...whats that wopping great motorbike battery doing sitting there in the background.Hope your not cheating,and if you look in the left hand corner you can see the grill from a £12.99 electric fan from ARGOS

I think his saying we should find out the old why we are here,what did we come from?.Find the answer to this before looking for life elsewhere.The only thing i could say is so far were falling short and require more data.DOV If we could find life elsewhere in the universe then that will give us a better understanding than were at now.I do hope you are not saying we should question our existence,our meaning to life,change our foundations and go all jove-witness type.Personally i like lions but wouldnt want the kids to play with one!

okay i wont offend you by stating what anyone would find obvious from my post.You replied exactly as ive been saying.What more can i say???Whats an astronauts face shield got to do with a satellite?how long without earths atmosphere would it take a solar flare to fry an egg?HAHA who mentioned astronauts should get there vanity mirrors out and signal,do actually know what equipment they had in order to signal hahha.You see dark shadows what are you talking about do you not get the fact im referring to pictures showing the subject material in shadow yet say the american flag on the side of the LM is clearly visible,yet the main of the craft is as it should be DARK?.I point out i take it for granted most here should be of average intelligence and you insinuate im offending everyone,which you have clearly taken my words out of context.I have stuck to the facts,but like your post you have chosen or fail to understand my post or enough information of the the subject then as expected launch into some character assasination.Would it be more beneficial if people dont express opinion with some added facts on any topic, and we all just sit here talking about subjects that have been proven beyond doubt,like hey thats the sun.If so why do scientists bother to experiment.You do realise they dont spend all there time validating things we already know,but sometimes look at things we dont ????

Hello ophiolite,So many questions asked from two threads which have been on this subject.I will try and answer a few here. Am i into conspiracies? not really i tend to believe whatever scientists etc say or print in reputable media.However later under scrutiny facts which dont add up or questions answered are flawed ,i reasearch and form an opinion after digesting both sides of whatever is being debated.On this particular subject my common sense opinion is of course USA landed on the moon 40%, and 60% hey these facts just dont add up.If i was asked what disturbs me out of certain conspiracies its the moon landing and the death of princess Diana. Regarding private firms going to the moon,the purpose of the ones that were given permission were not to land,only orbit and photograph previous landing sites to prove or disprove the controversy.One firm i recall but they were others was Trans orbital,with missions Trailblazer(to launch 2003) followed by electra 1 and 2.However after Columbia's 'accident' NASA withdrew permission? My views on Wikepedia are that its very general and vague for a scientific source of reference. As this threads on the moon-landing my pet annoyance is when someone (i take it for granted most here are of average intelligence)replies to a post with a tired debunk , Please read this carefully it may be im not putting it across right,let me know!eg The objects in shadow are lit up perfectly even though the rest of the subject remains in shadow.Reason given because of the moons high reflectivity the ground reflects some light back up from behind the shadow(this is directed at silly joe public because they look up from earth and see a shiny white moon). And i reply to them well this is untrue because the moon is actually a very dark brown colour when your actually stood on it,its actual reflectivity is around 7% so this explanation is invalid.The replies i then recieve get personal and silly.The facts of the moons reflectivity can easily be researched by anyone who is genuinely interested.I dont offer links to varify these things because my knowledge comes from a lifetime of reading and research,if someone cannot be bothered to google so be it.Im here to only have a discussion of peoples opinions and debate them,not prove im right they are wrong.If all i want is hard info on a subject i can get the answer easily by doing a google search. Its more stimulating when i read some science data which i think hold on i dont like that answer,i should go on a forum and see what the general ideas that are floating around are. Ok thats it i hope that answers you ophiolite. Some interesting facts i have found on the moon landing are this. 1..Between 1969-74 nasa already had in orbit one of the Apollo Tracking Network Test and Training Satellites, Transmitting exactly the kind of signals that would be expected from an Apollo spacecraft the TETR-C satellite. 2..The face shields on the helmets would have to have a temp tollerance of-250 to +250 degrees,no such material was or to my knowledge still hasnt been invented. 3..considering the magnitude and preciseness of the event,funny how the command module never returned within site of the recovery ships.Its not open to guess work that the module could just land anywere in a 250 mile radius so to speak.Its my opinion is that the command module was dropped from a plane. 4..while the astronauts were on the moon why didnt they make a visable signal to us here back on earth.They had the neccersary equipment to do so,and you dont have to be a rocket scientist to understand the great PR of doing so,especially in light of the cold war. 5..after the deaths of crew in apollo 1 the OCSA said the first landing should be unmanned.Its my opinion the loss of crew would have been utter failure and put Russia in the fore,so they didnt risk it.They landed a robot to accumulate rocks etc and took they photo's etc here on earth,Capricorn 1 and all that. 6.. no radio hams were able to tune in to the actual capsule transmissions. 7.. after previous landings nasa had confirmation that no life existed on the moon,also established and assured that no contamination was possible.But they immediately quarantined the returned astronauts for 3 weeks,quoting it was for contamination.My opinion is they didnt want some smartass media guy asking questions that would trip the atronauts up.They took the astronauts away for a lenghty get our story straight and wait for the dust to settle.Again the PR for having US guys woohaa'ing and telling the world how fantastic it was and rubbing them commies noses in it should have been priority. to finish would you not think the most famous of all astronauts N.ARMSTRONG,before he pops off to the next realm would have given an interview of how fantastic it was and the sites and awe of it all.No i dont believe he ever will because he knows in his heart,it was his and all other astronauts destiny and lifes wish,that they could do something like that and they offered there actual life to fulfill this ambition.He was robbed and knows its all a farce,whistleblow?hell no what for who would believe him before the powers that be carted him off to some hospital saying he had alziema'

star trek generations...that Q was brilliant

Personally i find that fox hunting is nothing.Too few are caught and killed by the hunt to make a difference.So a few get ripped to bits wow im shaking,there are too many do-gooders in this country.We send child murderers out on day release to Blackpool at half term.You should get a grip of reality and fcuk the fox

Coincidence 2003 then 2004 was the launch dates of private spacerockets to the moon,thus ending the speculation once and for all about the moon landing...ooooops sorry you cannot go there now all flights are cancelled we just lost a few astronauts(columbia),they could have saved them people easily but they were sacrificed for the cause