jerrygg38

What you say appears to be true. What is space? Space is really nothing by itself. What is inside of space are gravitational waves and electromagnetic waves. the properties of space are really the properties of the waves themselves. Beyond the waves there is nothing at all as far as we are concerned. Thus we have a finite universe and beyond our universe other universes could exist but they are no concern to us. At the big bang the entire universe was tiny and has expanded to the present size which exists from an absolute center and extends in dark energy to over 27 billion light years.

The fact that Einsteins calculations are excellent does not mean that his theory is valid. He based his special relativity upon the Michelson Morley experiment. He used it to produce his equations. The same equations are readily produced by the root mean square of simple Doppler Equations. What does his equations specify? All they say is that the Einsteinian solution is one solution out of at least three solutions. Thus we are only dealing with best fit approximations. It has been over 50 years since I studied the debates and many books were written. I like the Doppler Equations Mass front = MoC/(C-V) Mass rear= Mo/(C+V) Mass(rms) = Mo/[1-(V/C)^2]^0.5 So Einsteins equations and simple Doppler type equations yield the same results. The MIT studies of the forward and rearward masses were in the Military Secret libraries. The actual equations they used were more complex but since we are dealing with only small changes I like the simple Doppler instead. As far as my spherical analysis of the conversion of individual photons to spherical waves and visa versa, that is beyond my mathematical ability or interest. In Professor Levine's work on neutrinos, it is important to understand that huge amounts of neutrinos from the sun penetrate our bodies constantly with no ill effect. In my opinion this shows that photons come in two different forms. There are individual photons and photonic waves.The photonic waves cannot harm us but huge amounts of high energy photons would destroy all life upon this Earth. I am not an evidence collector. Since I deal with the basic structure of the universe, no measurements are possible. The dot-wave has a mass of 1.566E-72Kg which cannot readily interact with any measurement device. My work is an Engineering study and presently being review by 4 Physics professors who are reading my latest book. I do not predict things that scientists have no already found ways to measure such as gravitational waves. I explain them.

The Michelson/Morley experiment has three solutions. Einstein picked his special relativity solution which matched the instrument. It worked very well because his solution is a root mean square answer which is excellent for circular motions such as a clock spinning around the Earth. The alternative solution would be a Doppler Solution in which the geometric mean of the Doppler is identical with the Einstieinian solution. Thus the instrument can shrink in the forward direction toward the sun and expand in the rearward direction. The result is the geometric mean on of the two answers is the same as Einsteins equations. People have been arguing over these two solutions for a hundred years. The Electrophysicists like the Doppler Solution and the regular physicists like the Einsteining solution. The big problem is the validity of the experiment itself. In my "Gravity and the Dot-wave theory", the gravitational wave jumps which pushes the wave in front of it and this causes a kickback effect which pushes matter together. At the same time light from the sun originates in individual photons which convert into spherical patterns which jump along the gravitational waves. The net result is that as the waves approach the Earth they leave the sun's gravitational field and are absorbed by the Earths gravitational field. Thus the instrument sees light which is now referenced to the Earths field. The color changes but that is the individual photons which come from the interaction of the spherical field and matter. Thus the Michelson Morley experiment is invalid. Neither the Einsteinian solution nor the electro physicist solut-on has any meaning since the light approaching the instrument is referenced to the Earth itself.

As I see it in my theory "The Gravitational Wave and the Dot-wave theory", Gravity is both positive and negative. Matter constantly radiates dot-waves which jump in spherical wave patterns. As the gravitational waves jump they push the following waves and expand the universe. there is a kickback effect and this causes the gravitational force.When we add up all the waves we find that matter attracts matter as the waves point to the center of mass of the objects. However at the same time the universe expands. Thus gravity pushes matter together rather than causes matter to attract matter.

There are two solutions to the gravitational wave problem. The Einsteinian solution is that a massive body such as a black hole interacts with space and time producing ripples which propagate through space.This solution specifies that space itself has properties. Thus if you got rid of all the mass in the universe you would still have space. The alternative solution is that space is nothing at all and filled with waves. Thus the the big bang the entire universe existed as a small ball of energy. Outside this ball was nothing at all. the expansion of the ball produced matter and photonic energy. The ripples we see are the radiated energy within that ball.

JG: The big problem is that the path of science often goes astray. Good ideas are discarded and replaced by what seems correct but really is a dead end. Where are you teaching that the forward mass in front of a moving object is larger than the rearward mass? Are you teaching it now? Or is it still locked away???? Unfortunately there are a lot of things which are not allowed to be taught. Are you aware that there are libraries with information that the public cannot enter?? So the proven false ideas are not necessarily proven false. The powers that be often prefer to keep the masses ignorant. Those with the keys to the knowledge are often content to keep the masses unaware of the truth. So there are different levels of truth allowed by the authorities. Often they seem happy to teach and preach certain half truths. So by whose authority are things given the stamp of approval of being correct or incorrect? We end up with the party line. those in power produce the truths whether or not they are true. They serve the vested interest and they serve to befuddle those who are not party to the real truth. People sell their souls to the highest bidder. They will preach the truth according to those in power. The real truth must always be locked away under wraps. The Catholic Church took this approach long ago during the dark ages. The US Government takes this approach today. People will be taught to believe half truths. It is funny. If you have ever been in the "secret libraries" then things are much different. Most professors are quite afraid to deny the party line. It means their jobs. they will preach what they are taught. They will not look beyond the preached truths.

" JG:Evidently I have been told not to discuss dot wave theory all over the place. If we go to string theory which is similar to dot wave, we will find that way down the food chain are tiny subparticles which make up all the subparticles you like. I am only interested in the food chain at the very bottom. If we move to the very small we will find tiny spins and tiny charges. These make up the big spins. As soon as we go down to 2.15941E-29 meters we find the basis of spin. If you look at a compass we find a large field. However this large field is the result of much smaller fields. In this manner within the electron at the smallest level of string theory or dot-wave theory, internal spins exist. The sum total of these spins produce the spin terms. The proton has a total spin of 1/2. Great. This is the product of 2.27883E41 little spins. A proton standing alone in free space will self synchronize their spins. The electron in free space will self synchronize. Once we add the electron to the proton in the hydrogen atom the spins will align with each other in different planes. There are a lot of complications and phase angles involved. This produces very interesting absorption spectra along with the many other characteristics of the fields. In Doppler Space Time I described many equations for the various interactions. However that was in 2000 and I must rewrite the work in light of the new Dot-wave theory of 2008. When the proton merges with the electron in the neutron, a new realignment occurs. Electrical energy has converted into mass and we get less aligned spins. Thus the neutron has the spin of the proton. Once you get below the subparticles then you really are at the basics of physics. Of course the ordinary mind cannot do this. You have to have a special mind that can swing to the smallest subparticle and the largest dimensions of the universe. Few people can do this. However once the ideas are presented many people more brilliant than myself can readily understand. It is just that my mind is not limited to what I have been taught or what I can see or measure. My mind is unlimited. I have the ability to see what others cannot see.

JG: Although you could change all the mechanical equations of physics into electrical conversion terms, it would be pointless. It is much easier to describe the mechanical world in terms of kilograms, meters, and seconds. It is much easier to describe the electrical world in terms of coulombs, meters, and seconds. I would not use the conversion table to replace any mechanical formula. It only helps in the understanding of gravity in which the electrical equations are much simplier. However we could replace coulombs or kilograms with radians per second for a wave solution such as for string theory. In general all my equations are standard physics with the exception of the conversion charts, the equations for gravity and the cycle time of the universe, the radius of the universe, and a few other instances. My analysis of the energy of the proton has little to do with the dot-wave theory and more to do with the Einsteinian energy of the subparticle. JG: It would serve no purpose to change our standards of measurement. JG: Most of my data comes from my school textbooks. Weidner & Sells Elementary Modern Physics Allyn & Bacon 1960. Plus many electrical textbooks. The Doppler Mass equations come from the MIT study which was confirmed by some other universities. (I may not have posted that yet) The Einsteinian mass increase in the Bohr Orbit is simply calculated using his formula. My Dot-wave unified field theory contains basic ordinary physics plus the dot-wave analysis. "Do these two look the same to you?" JG: No mass and charge do not look the same to me. They are different sister properties of the elemental structure of the universe. Since a plus charge and a minus charge can produce mass, they have the same units. Thus kilograms and coulombs are the same thing. That does not mean I can write equations substituting kilograms for coulombs. One kilogram does not equal one coulomb. We must maintain standard equations for this work. Thus F = G MM/RR can only be calculated using kilograms, meters, and the gravitational constant. It is only when we subdivide matter into the smallest subparticles that we can use the relationship between mass and charge. "If you claim mass is equal to charge, you must explain and prove it. " JG: I explain things. I show how things work. Proving things to others require their interest in accepting new ideas. "If you claim the UNITS are the same, you've never opened or read a physics book, and you apparently don't know the meaning of SI units." JG: Sure BSEE (Summa Cum Laude) from Brooklyn Polytechnic and I never learned any physics. Never got less than 100 on any science test. The only 100 on the Electrical Comprehensive exam in 1956. Designer of the SDC/GMP for the 5 inch guns on the Aegis class destroyers which the Navy labeled the Maytag since it worked the first time and everytime. Did the lighting for the Long Island Expressway. Did the control logic design for the fuel pumping station at Kenedy airport for the Port of NY Authority. Solved many problems for the Polaris system. the Nexrad system for Sperry which later was Unisys. I build things that work. Perhaps I am not as good as expressing my ideas so others can understand. However I do have some people who read my books and want more. "Seriously. It's a science forum. Before we can discuss the validity (or lack thereof) of you theory, we should make sure we START from a vaild premise." JG: The valid premise is that the universe is simple. It is composed of only three fundamental things. A plus dot a minus dot and a bipolar dot. The first two are electrical and the last is mechanical. "You can't seriously expect us to treat you seriously when your claims are just ridiculously unfounded and ignore truth." JG: That is your choice. I spent 27 years working out my equations. Some people like them. Others chose to ignor them. There is nothing that I can do about that.

"If you read some of the OPs other posts you will see he is very explicit in stating that mass is charge, and charge only. He has yet to explain why leptons (or quarks) of two generations with the same charge and spin have different masses or why leptons are much less massive than baryons.[/QU" JG: I do not know if you are referring to me. Mass and charge have the same units but not the same properties. Charge produces mass and mass produces charge. thus they are sisters of each other. In general a mass exhibits mechanical properties. Charge exhibits electrical properties. They are interchangeable. Thus electrical energy can produce mechanical energy and mechanical energy can produce electrical energy. Why are leptons less massive than baryons. The dot wave theory is a reformulation of Doppler Space Time and only completed a month ago. I have only worked out a few particles The U-meson shower produces Product = (-pi) + (-pi) + (+pi) + (+u) The masses are M(+pi) = 273.23 Me M (-pi) = 273.23 M (+u) = 206.84 Each of these particles exits the neutron at 0.9186C which is standard for all the high energy subparticles as they emerge from the neutron/ proton radius. The Einsteinian mass/energy of the high energy pi and u mesons are M = 206.84 x 2.530338 = 523.375 Me Mass of 3 high speed U-mesons = 1570.13 Me When we add a pi to it we get M = 1570.13 + 273.23 = 1843.36 Me When we look at the K-mesons we find: M(u) = 523.375 Me M (pi) = 692.19 The mass of the proton is 1836.149Me The mass difference between a proton and a K meson is delta mass = 869.149Me Four delta masses equals 3476.596Me Two pi mesons at 0.9186C has a mass energy of 2 high speed pi mesons = 1384.38Me 4 high speed U-mesons = 2093.5Me Total product = 3477.88 MEV Therefore when 4 protons are hit or a pair of protons and neutrons, they produce 4 k-mesons and 6 pi-mesons. The 2182 Me Lambda decay into a proton and a pi-particle 2 Lambda = 4364Me Mp + Mn = 1836 Me + 1839 Me = 3675 Me The particle difference is 689Me the mass of the resulting particle is 689Me/ 2.5043 = 273.52 Me Thus the product of Lambdas decay produced the pi particle. All the particles are readily understood as long as the Einsteinian energy level is taken into consideration. A computer analysis will produce better results since the Author only has a pocket calculator. This is better than the slide rule the author used 27 years ago to start the theory.

JG: Good question. You may not like my answer but I will give it to you. Since you do not like dots let us say that within the proton and electron are subparticles with internal spins. Let us say they are the product of strings which are very small. The spins of the proton are the product of its internal spins. The proton has a spin of 1/2 and the electron has a spin of 1/2, the neutron has a spin of 1/2. Thus it was assumed that the electron could not have emerged into the proton because it would have to have a spin of 1. Within the structure of the proton one finds a large amount of spins in assorted directions. Some parts of the proton structure form an aligned spin of 1/2. The same is true of the electron although the electron has much less subparticles of assorted spins. Once the proton and electron join, there is a transfer of energy between the aligned and unaligned spins of the subparticles. The net result is that the electron loses its internal spin components. The electron and the proton are fused together within the neutron. ——————— Hope this answers your question.

JG: Not necessarily so. It is true that accelerating charges on the large scale radiate energy. Thus the physics of antennas produce radio waves, radar pulses, etc. The Bohr model may not be perfect but let us look at the electrons charge revolving around the proton. You may be happier with standing waves for the orbits but mathematically the Bohr model would give good results. The electron will produce a spherical DC field which is modulated. It will react with space dots continually. There will be continuous mass to electrical energy transformations which is the basis of the Heisenberg principle. What you end up with is a very complex space time interaction in which the electron will radiate mass/energy and absorb mass/energy all along its cycle. The net result is zero net radiation. In effect the electron/proton hydrogen atom has continuous changes as it moves within the Bohr orbit. Certainly the Bohr orbit is simple but it is my belief that it is correct. The mathematicians have produced great equations to explain things from a mathematical perspective. The universe operates from a physical perspective. The mathematical laws are excellent representations of the physical effects. It is just very difficult to formulate the interactions which depend upon statistical methods. Thus every electron has a different mass/charge from every other electron at every split second of time. Einsteins mass/energy formulas when applied to the Bohr orbit yield very interesting results. At least they tell us what is happening from a physical perspective.

"That mass, however, arises the strong force, not electromagnetism. The OP makes no mention of the strong force, or the weak force, or the Higgs mechanism" What does your abbreviation OP mean?

Error Sorry 13.606 electron volts not MEV JG: I may be going on 70 this year but in reality I do not feel much different than when I was going to school. When I was younger I thought 70 was quite old but except for a little pain here and there and a little slower, I really feel little difference than when I was much younger. The Bohr Model is a simple tool to describe the hydrogen atom. Of course the mathematicians have produced detailed formulas over the years which have helped to calculate things better. However the simple Bohr model is readily understood. My calculation shows that the electron gains 13.58 electron volts of mass/energy form the Einsteinian formula in the first Bohr orbit. Thus the ionization energy is identical in magnitude with the Einsteinian energy. This is important because the same effect happends as the electron merges into the proton to form the neutron. At the proton radius the electron reaches a speed of 0.9186C. This mass/energy increase negates the need for a neutrino of the mass/energy difference. only a smaller mass/energy neutrino is required. The Bohr model when you add the Einsteinian energy tells you what is happening. The mathematicians may have other answers but this does not help to understand how to obtain the protons energy for the future power source.

so the galaxy is charged? what is providing the other charge? JG: The galaxy is neutral. What I am saying is that a proton has a field which is neutralized by the electrons field at huge distances. The same is true of the individual dots. you said it was on a glactic scale not a universal scale. also unified field theory has not been discovered. nor have we seen evidence for variable light speed. JG; In glass light travels slowly. Near a black hole light slows. Around the sun, light slows. Light is variable. so you have no evidence that dots exist at all? JG: Many people believe that the electron is a cloud but they do conflict with your theory, none of these predict dots or that charge and mass are equivalent. also if it cannot be measured, of what use is it? JG: It takes time for me to get my work across. so, whats a photonic converter? JG: converts protons to photons yet pure standard physics also says you are wrong... JG: There is nothing in pure physics which I do not use. Going on a trip today. Be back tonight or tomorrow.