jerrygg38

What you say appears to be true. What is space? Space is really nothing by itself. What is inside of space are gravitational waves and electromagnetic waves. the properties of space are really the properties of the waves themselves. Beyond the waves there is nothing at all as far as we are concerned. Thus we have a finite universe and beyond our universe other universes could exist but they are no concern to us. At the big bang the entire universe was tiny and has expanded to the present size which exists from an absolute center and extends in dark energy to over 27 billion light years.

The fact that Einsteins calculations are excellent does not mean that his theory is valid. He based his special relativity upon the Michelson Morley experiment. He used it to produce his equations. The same equations are readily produced by the root mean square of simple Doppler Equations. What does his equations specify? All they say is that the Einsteinian solution is one solution out of at least three solutions. Thus we are only dealing with best fit approximations. It has been over 50 years since I studied the debates and many books were written. I like the Doppler Equations Mass front = MoC/(C-V) Mass rear= Mo/(C+V) Mass(rms) = Mo/[1-(V/C)^2]^0.5 So Einsteins equations and simple Doppler type equations yield the same results. The MIT studies of the forward and rearward masses were in the Military Secret libraries. The actual equations they used were more complex but since we are dealing with only small changes I like the simple Doppler instead. As far as my spherical analysis of the conversion of individual photons to spherical waves and visa versa, that is beyond my mathematical ability or interest. In Professor Levine's work on neutrinos, it is important to understand that huge amounts of neutrinos from the sun penetrate our bodies constantly with no ill effect. In my opinion this shows that photons come in two different forms. There are individual photons and photonic waves.The photonic waves cannot harm us but huge amounts of high energy photons would destroy all life upon this Earth. I am not an evidence collector. Since I deal with the basic structure of the universe, no measurements are possible. The dot-wave has a mass of 1.566E-72Kg which cannot readily interact with any measurement device. My work is an Engineering study and presently being review by 4 Physics professors who are reading my latest book. I do not predict things that scientists have no already found ways to measure such as gravitational waves. I explain them.

The Michelson/Morley experiment has three solutions. Einstein picked his special relativity solution which matched the instrument. It worked very well because his solution is a root mean square answer which is excellent for circular motions such as a clock spinning around the Earth. The alternative solution would be a Doppler Solution in which the geometric mean of the Doppler is identical with the Einstieinian solution. Thus the instrument can shrink in the forward direction toward the sun and expand in the rearward direction. The result is the geometric mean on of the two answers is the same as Einsteins equations. People have been arguing over these two solutions for a hundred years. The Electrophysicists like the Doppler Solution and the regular physicists like the Einsteining solution. The big problem is the validity of the experiment itself. In my "Gravity and the Dot-wave theory", the gravitational wave jumps which pushes the wave in front of it and this causes a kickback effect which pushes matter together. At the same time light from the sun originates in individual photons which convert into spherical patterns which jump along the gravitational waves. The net result is that as the waves approach the Earth they leave the sun's gravitational field and are absorbed by the Earths gravitational field. Thus the instrument sees light which is now referenced to the Earths field. The color changes but that is the individual photons which come from the interaction of the spherical field and matter. Thus the Michelson Morley experiment is invalid. Neither the Einsteinian solution nor the electro physicist solut-on has any meaning since the light approaching the instrument is referenced to the Earth itself.

As I see it in my theory "The Gravitational Wave and the Dot-wave theory", Gravity is both positive and negative. Matter constantly radiates dot-waves which jump in spherical wave patterns. As the gravitational waves jump they push the following waves and expand the universe. there is a kickback effect and this causes the gravitational force.When we add up all the waves we find that matter attracts matter as the waves point to the center of mass of the objects. However at the same time the universe expands. Thus gravity pushes matter together rather than causes matter to attract matter.

There are two solutions to the gravitational wave problem. The Einsteinian solution is that a massive body such as a black hole interacts with space and time producing ripples which propagate through space.This solution specifies that space itself has properties. Thus if you got rid of all the mass in the universe you would still have space. The alternative solution is that space is nothing at all and filled with waves. Thus the the big bang the entire universe existed as a small ball of energy. Outside this ball was nothing at all. the expansion of the ball produced matter and photonic energy. The ripples we see are the radiated energy within that ball.

JG: The big problem is that the path of science often goes astray. Good ideas are discarded and replaced by what seems correct but really is a dead end. Where are you teaching that the forward mass in front of a moving object is larger than the rearward mass? Are you teaching it now? Or is it still locked away???? Unfortunately there are a lot of things which are not allowed to be taught. Are you aware that there are libraries with information that the public cannot enter?? So the proven false ideas are not necessarily proven false. The powers that be often prefer to keep the masses ignorant. Those with the keys to the knowledge are often content to keep the masses unaware of the truth. So there are different levels of truth allowed by the authorities. Often they seem happy to teach and preach certain half truths. So by whose authority are things given the stamp of approval of being correct or incorrect? We end up with the party line. those in power produce the truths whether or not they are true. They serve the vested interest and they serve to befuddle those who are not party to the real truth. People sell their souls to the highest bidder. They will preach the truth according to those in power. The real truth must always be locked away under wraps. The Catholic Church took this approach long ago during the dark ages. The US Government takes this approach today. People will be taught to believe half truths. It is funny. If you have ever been in the "secret libraries" then things are much different. Most professors are quite afraid to deny the party line. It means their jobs. they will preach what they are taught. They will not look beyond the preached truths.

" JG:Evidently I have been told not to discuss dot wave theory all over the place. If we go to string theory which is similar to dot wave, we will find that way down the food chain are tiny subparticles which make up all the subparticles you like. I am only interested in the food chain at the very bottom. If we move to the very small we will find tiny spins and tiny charges. These make up the big spins. As soon as we go down to 2.15941E-29 meters we find the basis of spin. If you look at a compass we find a large field. However this large field is the result of much smaller fields. In this manner within the electron at the smallest level of string theory or dot-wave theory, internal spins exist. The sum total of these spins produce the spin terms. The proton has a total spin of 1/2. Great. This is the product of 2.27883E41 little spins. A proton standing alone in free space will self synchronize their spins. The electron in free space will self synchronize. Once we add the electron to the proton in the hydrogen atom the spins will align with each other in different planes. There are a lot of complications and phase angles involved. This produces very interesting absorption spectra along with the many other characteristics of the fields. In Doppler Space Time I described many equations for the various interactions. However that was in 2000 and I must rewrite the work in light of the new Dot-wave theory of 2008. When the proton merges with the electron in the neutron, a new realignment occurs. Electrical energy has converted into mass and we get less aligned spins. Thus the neutron has the spin of the proton. Once you get below the subparticles then you really are at the basics of physics. Of course the ordinary mind cannot do this. You have to have a special mind that can swing to the smallest subparticle and the largest dimensions of the universe. Few people can do this. However once the ideas are presented many people more brilliant than myself can readily understand. It is just that my mind is not limited to what I have been taught or what I can see or measure. My mind is unlimited. I have the ability to see what others cannot see.

JG: Although you could change all the mechanical equations of physics into electrical conversion terms, it would be pointless. It is much easier to describe the mechanical world in terms of kilograms, meters, and seconds. It is much easier to describe the electrical world in terms of coulombs, meters, and seconds. I would not use the conversion table to replace any mechanical formula. It only helps in the understanding of gravity in which the electrical equations are much simplier. However we could replace coulombs or kilograms with radians per second for a wave solution such as for string theory. In general all my equations are standard physics with the exception of the conversion charts, the equations for gravity and the cycle time of the universe, the radius of the universe, and a few other instances. My analysis of the energy of the proton has little to do with the dot-wave theory and more to do with the Einsteinian energy of the subparticle. JG: It would serve no purpose to change our standards of measurement. JG: Most of my data comes from my school textbooks. Weidner & Sells Elementary Modern Physics Allyn & Bacon 1960. Plus many electrical textbooks. The Doppler Mass equations come from the MIT study which was confirmed by some other universities. (I may not have posted that yet) The Einsteinian mass increase in the Bohr Orbit is simply calculated using his formula. My Dot-wave unified field theory contains basic ordinary physics plus the dot-wave analysis. "Do these two look the same to you?" JG: No mass and charge do not look the same to me. They are different sister properties of the elemental structure of the universe. Since a plus charge and a minus charge can produce mass, they have the same units. Thus kilograms and coulombs are the same thing. That does not mean I can write equations substituting kilograms for coulombs. One kilogram does not equal one coulomb. We must maintain standard equations for this work. Thus F = G MM/RR can only be calculated using kilograms, meters, and the gravitational constant. It is only when we subdivide matter into the smallest subparticles that we can use the relationship between mass and charge. "If you claim mass is equal to charge, you must explain and prove it. " JG: I explain things. I show how things work. Proving things to others require their interest in accepting new ideas. "If you claim the UNITS are the same, you've never opened or read a physics book, and you apparently don't know the meaning of SI units." JG: Sure BSEE (Summa Cum Laude) from Brooklyn Polytechnic and I never learned any physics. Never got less than 100 on any science test. The only 100 on the Electrical Comprehensive exam in 1956. Designer of the SDC/GMP for the 5 inch guns on the Aegis class destroyers which the Navy labeled the Maytag since it worked the first time and everytime. Did the lighting for the Long Island Expressway. Did the control logic design for the fuel pumping station at Kenedy airport for the Port of NY Authority. Solved many problems for the Polaris system. the Nexrad system for Sperry which later was Unisys. I build things that work. Perhaps I am not as good as expressing my ideas so others can understand. However I do have some people who read my books and want more. "Seriously. It's a science forum. Before we can discuss the validity (or lack thereof) of you theory, we should make sure we START from a vaild premise." JG: The valid premise is that the universe is simple. It is composed of only three fundamental things. A plus dot a minus dot and a bipolar dot. The first two are electrical and the last is mechanical. "You can't seriously expect us to treat you seriously when your claims are just ridiculously unfounded and ignore truth." JG: That is your choice. I spent 27 years working out my equations. Some people like them. Others chose to ignor them. There is nothing that I can do about that.

"If you read some of the OPs other posts you will see he is very explicit in stating that mass is charge, and charge only. He has yet to explain why leptons (or quarks) of two generations with the same charge and spin have different masses or why leptons are much less massive than baryons.[/QU" JG: I do not know if you are referring to me. Mass and charge have the same units but not the same properties. Charge produces mass and mass produces charge. thus they are sisters of each other. In general a mass exhibits mechanical properties. Charge exhibits electrical properties. They are interchangeable. Thus electrical energy can produce mechanical energy and mechanical energy can produce electrical energy. Why are leptons less massive than baryons. The dot wave theory is a reformulation of Doppler Space Time and only completed a month ago. I have only worked out a few particles The U-meson shower produces Product = (-pi) + (-pi) + (+pi) + (+u) The masses are M(+pi) = 273.23 Me M (-pi) = 273.23 M (+u) = 206.84 Each of these particles exits the neutron at 0.9186C which is standard for all the high energy subparticles as they emerge from the neutron/ proton radius. The Einsteinian mass/energy of the high energy pi and u mesons are M = 206.84 x 2.530338 = 523.375 Me Mass of 3 high speed U-mesons = 1570.13 Me When we add a pi to it we get M = 1570.13 + 273.23 = 1843.36 Me When we look at the K-mesons we find: M(u) = 523.375 Me M (pi) = 692.19 The mass of the proton is 1836.149Me The mass difference between a proton and a K meson is delta mass = 869.149Me Four delta masses equals 3476.596Me Two pi mesons at 0.9186C has a mass energy of 2 high speed pi mesons = 1384.38Me 4 high speed U-mesons = 2093.5Me Total product = 3477.88 MEV Therefore when 4 protons are hit or a pair of protons and neutrons, they produce 4 k-mesons and 6 pi-mesons. The 2182 Me Lambda decay into a proton and a pi-particle 2 Lambda = 4364Me Mp + Mn = 1836 Me + 1839 Me = 3675 Me The particle difference is 689Me the mass of the resulting particle is 689Me/ 2.5043 = 273.52 Me Thus the product of Lambdas decay produced the pi particle. All the particles are readily understood as long as the Einsteinian energy level is taken into consideration. A computer analysis will produce better results since the Author only has a pocket calculator. This is better than the slide rule the author used 27 years ago to start the theory.

JG: Good question. You may not like my answer but I will give it to you. Since you do not like dots let us say that within the proton and electron are subparticles with internal spins. Let us say they are the product of strings which are very small. The spins of the proton are the product of its internal spins. The proton has a spin of 1/2 and the electron has a spin of 1/2, the neutron has a spin of 1/2. Thus it was assumed that the electron could not have emerged into the proton because it would have to have a spin of 1. Within the structure of the proton one finds a large amount of spins in assorted directions. Some parts of the proton structure form an aligned spin of 1/2. The same is true of the electron although the electron has much less subparticles of assorted spins. Once the proton and electron join, there is a transfer of energy between the aligned and unaligned spins of the subparticles. The net result is that the electron loses its internal spin components. The electron and the proton are fused together within the neutron. ——————— Hope this answers your question.

JG: Not necessarily so. It is true that accelerating charges on the large scale radiate energy. Thus the physics of antennas produce radio waves, radar pulses, etc. The Bohr model may not be perfect but let us look at the electrons charge revolving around the proton. You may be happier with standing waves for the orbits but mathematically the Bohr model would give good results. The electron will produce a spherical DC field which is modulated. It will react with space dots continually. There will be continuous mass to electrical energy transformations which is the basis of the Heisenberg principle. What you end up with is a very complex space time interaction in which the electron will radiate mass/energy and absorb mass/energy all along its cycle. The net result is zero net radiation. In effect the electron/proton hydrogen atom has continuous changes as it moves within the Bohr orbit. Certainly the Bohr orbit is simple but it is my belief that it is correct. The mathematicians have produced great equations to explain things from a mathematical perspective. The universe operates from a physical perspective. The mathematical laws are excellent representations of the physical effects. It is just very difficult to formulate the interactions which depend upon statistical methods. Thus every electron has a different mass/charge from every other electron at every split second of time. Einsteins mass/energy formulas when applied to the Bohr orbit yield very interesting results. At least they tell us what is happening from a physical perspective.

"That mass, however, arises the strong force, not electromagnetism. The OP makes no mention of the strong force, or the weak force, or the Higgs mechanism" What does your abbreviation OP mean?

Error Sorry 13.606 electron volts not MEV JG: I may be going on 70 this year but in reality I do not feel much different than when I was going to school. When I was younger I thought 70 was quite old but except for a little pain here and there and a little slower, I really feel little difference than when I was much younger. The Bohr Model is a simple tool to describe the hydrogen atom. Of course the mathematicians have produced detailed formulas over the years which have helped to calculate things better. However the simple Bohr model is readily understood. My calculation shows that the electron gains 13.58 electron volts of mass/energy form the Einsteinian formula in the first Bohr orbit. Thus the ionization energy is identical in magnitude with the Einsteinian energy. This is important because the same effect happends as the electron merges into the proton to form the neutron. At the proton radius the electron reaches a speed of 0.9186C. This mass/energy increase negates the need for a neutrino of the mass/energy difference. only a smaller mass/energy neutrino is required. The Bohr model when you add the Einsteinian energy tells you what is happening. The mathematicians may have other answers but this does not help to understand how to obtain the protons energy for the future power source.

so the galaxy is charged? what is providing the other charge? JG: The galaxy is neutral. What I am saying is that a proton has a field which is neutralized by the electrons field at huge distances. The same is true of the individual dots. you said it was on a glactic scale not a universal scale. also unified field theory has not been discovered. nor have we seen evidence for variable light speed. JG; In glass light travels slowly. Near a black hole light slows. Around the sun, light slows. Light is variable. so you have no evidence that dots exist at all? JG: Many people believe that the electron is a cloud but they do conflict with your theory, none of these predict dots or that charge and mass are equivalent. also if it cannot be measured, of what use is it? JG: It takes time for me to get my work across. so, whats a photonic converter? JG: converts protons to photons yet pure standard physics also says you are wrong... JG: There is nothing in pure physics which I do not use. Going on a trip today. Be back tonight or tomorrow.

JG: That is my formal education. Thus the scientific data I use is almost 50 years old. All the quarks and larks and things like that are not part of my study. I only study the basics.

Let us calculate the Einsteinian energy of the Bohr orbit. We know the answer to be 13.58 electron volts. The orbit velocity is approximately C/137 so we get 137 revolutions per cycle. the difference in mass/energy is M = Mo / (1-(V/C)^2)^0.5 where Mo = 0.510999MEV for V - C/137 the Einsteinian correction factor is 0.999732 Therefore M= 0.510999/0.99997336 = 0.51101261 MEV the differential mass/energy is Delta mass = 13.61 electron volts If we use a speed of C/137.036 we get Delta mass = 13.606 MEV The result is that the binding energy of the hydrogen atom is identical with the Einsteinian mass/energy relationship. This is important because when we look at the relationships between the u-mesons, and the pi-mesons and all the other particles, the Einsteinian energy is important. This shows that the electrical energy is being converted into mass and visa versa.

JG: When you define science by what you can see and measure, surely my theory does not fit into science as such defined. Yet until we understand the basic structure of the universe we will not progress to build energy sources of the future. Knowing 10,000 particles will not help us. We must understand that the universe is composed of only three things.

The universe we live in can be described in terms of kilograms, meters, seconds, and coulombs. Here we have four units. Why are four units necessary? It does not make sense to build a universe requiring four units. Three should be sufficient. That means we can describe the universe in terms of coulombs, meters, and seconds or kilograms, meters, and seconds. Mass and charge must be related to each other in some manner. Therefore we can produce charts of conversion equations and see what fruit occurs. If the charts are correct we should be able to produce equations for the universe. These will produce gravitational equations, the radius of the universe, the cycle time of the universe, etc. Thus the unified field theory must be based upon the correct conversion chart. How do we produce these charts? Let us look at the basic equations of the universe. F= KQQ/RR Force equals coulombs constant k times charge Q squared divided by distance R squarred. h = energy x time Plank's constant h equals energy times time F = GMM/RR = K QQ/RR The gravitational constant times mass squarred divided by distance R squared equals force. Notice the form of the equation specified that mechanical forces and electrical forces are equivalent. This ties the electrical world to the mechanical world. The obvious solution to Einstein long ago was that mass = Charge. I saw a photograph of Einstein writing this on a chalk board long ago. Unfortunately I discounted this as a sister solution but not the first sister solution. I was wrong. It took me 25 years to finally agree with Einstein. My reasoning was that if no one proceeded with Einsteins solution, it must have been incorrect. Einstein was old. He never finished this analysis. He just felt it was true. V = KQ/R Voltage is coulombs constant times charge divided by distance R. Uo Eo = 1/ CC The electrical permeability times the electrical permivity equals one over the speed of light squared. B = Uo I / R The flux density B equals the electrical permeability B times the current I divided by the distance R. With these equations we can now produce charts of conversion tables using the following relationships M = Q (meters to any power / (seconds to any power) We now have a general equation which relates mass to charge. Mass can be M = Q M = Q/C M= QC M = I (current) M= IC M = I/C The above are only some of the solutions studied. After years of study the Author sends the manuscripts to various schools for responses. In 1988 the Author was typing on an 1898 underwood typewriter and xeroxing the work. The results were poor. I tried to do the universe with only two units. Once the Author finished a work, time passes and the Author restudies the work and self-destructs it. Many are sent out all over the world and only a few professors review the work. My greatest critic is myself since for every solution I see many alternatives. By 2000 I self published Doppler Space Time. Although it did not produce all the answers, it did produce some. The book was liked by some. Some professors gave me good comments. However it was not good enough. I did not understand the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. I did not understand the exact nature of light nor the bipolar dot. By 2006, all my calculations were destroyed. Einstein made a lot of mistakes. My Doppler Space Time gives the same answer as Einstein for orbital motion but linear motion is different. We live in a Doppler Universe. However Einstein was correct in that mass = Charge. Years of work destroyed. Tens of thousands of dollars of borrowed money for my books wasted. 25 years of effort to solve the universe down the drain in one moment of realization that mass and charge are interchangeable. Einstein was correct and I was wrong for doubting him. JG: I can explain my theory. I cannot measure the dot. I can only calculate it. I started the theory in my basement with only a slide rule. I have not machines to work with. It would take a billion dollars to build the first photonic converter. I get by on social security and a small pension. All I can do is present my theory. JG: I do not deny the existing laws and measurement. Newtons laws, the Einsteinian orbital calculations do not conflict with my theory. The quantum mechanical mathematical laws are perfectly fine to me. What I do is go beyond what can be seen or measured. What is seen and measured are large scale interactions of the dots. It takes 1.24109E38 bipolar dots to produce an electron. the physical laws of nature are the laws of huge amounts of dots. The laws of the dots are similar. This is especially true with light energy which is composed of balanced blends of plus and minus dots. The photons are the dots in the purest form. When we break apart the protons in the photonic converter we will have pure dot energy. Thus protons will become photons. I rely upon standard physics books and standard electrical theory. However I reduce everything to the simple dot which has a direct relationship to the radius of the universe. When I discuss the binding energy of the proton, I do not discuss the dot theory. The only thing important is the Einsteinian energy. Pure standard physics is used for much of my work.

Okay. Perhaps I should start slower with the basic understanding of how I arrived at the mass to charge conversion tables. I do this in the theory but I do jump on to the equations, which may seem strange to many. The whole basis of the dot-wave unified field theory is that the entire universe can be described in simple terms. The minute we only have three basic units, everything becomes easy to understand. Today I am going to Mount Airy with the family to enjoy some leaves and enjoy the Mayberry exhibits. I have only lived in NC for 8 months. I will get back on the air tomorrow. Let us look at the basic structure of the universe. Let us build a universe in the most simple manner. The present universe we live in has three basic building blocks at the atomic level. The proton, the electron, and the neutron. The proton is positive, the electron is negative. Notice the neutron is composed of a positive entity and a negative entity. Thus two things produce a third thing. Everything we see is made up of these three things. In a similar manner, the most simple universe can be produced by a positive entity called a plus dot and a minus entity called a minus dot. When we combine the two things we get a neutral dot called a bipolar dot. Thus the most simple universe we can make is composed of three things. Anyone who needs more than three basic things negates the simplicity of the universe. Those who need quarks and super quarks and the like negate the simplicity of the fundamental structure of the universe. If you need more than three simple things then there is a fundamental flaw in your design. As an Engineer, I build practical things. What I build must work. It is not necessary for me to understand all the details of the things that I build. However in the end, the thing must work. Thus I build universes which must work. If more than three ingredients are necessary to build a universe, then it is too complex to work. Let us look at the properties of the dots. For the moment we will look at standard physics where the fields are part of the properties of the dots. Later we can eliminate the fields as interactions of the dots themselves. Thus we will start with basic physics. A plus dot is a small charge. The field extends outward to a neutral conducting plane billions of light years away. A minus dot is a small charge whose field extends to a neutral conducting plane billions of light years away. Thus the fields end at the radius of the galaxy or universe. The dots obey the electrical laws. Same charge dots repel while opposite charges attract. The characteristics of the dots are: Charge, electrical energy, momentum, zero mass, light speed velocity We see that the dots are in constant motion, the posess momentum, they have zero rest mass, they have small charges. This is the basic building block of the photons. Thus photons are composed of plus and minus dots. The electrical fields are composed of the dots. The magnetic fields are compose of moving dots. Light and the electrical world are a world of dots. We could try to build a world only of plus and minus dots. The Author did this for many years. Mass consisted of mixtures of plus and minus dots. thus a proton had positive dots plus a blend of plus and minus dots. The electron had negative dots plus a smaller blend of plus and minus dots. Although a somewhat reasonable approach, this solution failed to answer many important questions. From 1981 to 2006, the author attemped to explain the universe this way. The Author was wrong. Something was missing. The bipolar dot was missing. Let us look at the characteristics of the bipolar dot where a plus dot and a minus dot form together in a "well". The bipolar dot has zero electrical DC charge The bipolar dot as a bipolar DC oscillation which is an AC field. The bipolar dot tends to be stationary. The bipolar dot has inertial. The bipolar dot has mass. The bipolar dot has energy. We now have the solution for the Heisenberg uncertainty principle which can be renamed the "Heisenberg mass to electrical energy conversion principle" MASS IN THE FORM OF BIPOLAR DOTS CONTINUALLY TRANSFORMS INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY IN THE FORM OF PHOTONIC PLUS AND MINUS DOTS AND VISA VERSA. The above law is the way the universe works. Light becomes matter and matter become light.

It appears that no one in this group is interested in the dot-wave unified field theory. No use wasting my time or your time. If anyone wants me to proceed please indicate. Otherwise I will look for another group.

JG: I cannot produce evidence of the dot-wave since it cannot be measured as itself. However if you measure the electric field, you are really measuring dots. The magnetic field you see with iron filings are dots in motion. Fancy equations can be made but the basic structure of the universe is quite simple. People who cannot appreciate the simplicity of nature will not appreciate my dot-wave unified field theory. However those countries who take my work seriously will advance ahead of those who do not have the capacity to recognize the simplicity and genius of my work. JG: Which hypothesis are you interested in? The calculation of the dot charge and bipolar dot mass? The reasoning behind my conversion of mass to charge table? The Einsteinian mass/energy of the electron as it merges into the proton to form the neutron? I have posted some elements of these and will post more.

JG: I have no peers. I am an independent thinker. The way I work is the same way I design electrical circuitry. I look at the problem and write down answers. Then I study the answers. Each morning I awake with corrections. Most of my thinking occurs at night during sleep. I awake with the results of the prior nights thinking. That is the way I designed the SDC/GMP signal data converter/gun mount processor for the 5 inch guns on the Aegis class destroyers. After I was finished the Navy called it the Maytag since it worked the first time and every time. In the same way I solved the Rubic Cube one night by spinning the sides for a few hours. Then I let my inner mind take over and in a trancelike state I merely spun the sides in a few seconds and the cube was solved. In order to solve the physics of the universe, I spent several years looking at the numerical relationships between all the constants of the universe. I notices that all the numbers were close to each other by certain correction factors. Then I studied tables of conversions between mass and charge. Certainly there had to be some relationship between the two. It took me about from 1981 to 1989 working part time about 40 hours per week until I came to the first formulation. Then I studied that for several years. I self published 4 books which I sold on the internet or gave away to university libraries. In 2000 I produced Doppler Space Time but after one year I was not happy with the results. It had the basic equation for gravity but the wrong conversion chart. It used M= QC This is a sister solution which says mass = coulomb meters per second Although you may not believe it, the universe is a simple place and mass and charge have a relationship. Thus the entire universe can be represented by only three units which can be coulombs, meters,and seconds or kilograms, meters, and seconds. However for the non-electrical engineer the option is radians per second, meters, and seconds. Thus when we look at the dot wave we can describe it as a vibration. The importance of this as shown in my Chapter 11 of the Dot-wave Unified field theory is that we can look at the dot wave at big bang of 1.59407E-37 meters. Thus the dot-wave can be considered an oscillating string which varies from a very small size at big bang to the present size today. It can also be assumed that there could be a driving function of an exponential sinusoid which drives all the dot waves. This function would be (1.85533E-33) e ^ (-)9.3611cosine theta The importance of the dot-wave unified field theory is that it competely produces a multi-light-speed universe from an Engineering viewpoint. It is a workable universe. Whether or not correction factors must be added to give more accurate results are not important. What is important is that in the future we will be able to produce the photonic energy source which will only require a ten foot diameter device rather than the mile long linear accelerators. Thus as soon as man understands the dot-wave theory he can start to build the energy sources of the future. the downside of this discovery is that the military can produce photonic beams which will destroy everything in their path. Thus in a split second incoming missles can be destroyed. Unfortunaely spaceships with photonic energy sources can destroy enemy cities at will. Thus the good of producing pure clean photonic energy also enable the complete destruction of mankind. On the other hand, global warming will destroy us soon enough. So future man has the choice of moving forward with clean energy or destroying mankind. If I had the money I could build the first photonic converter in a few years. However I do not have many years to go so all I can do is explain the dot-wave theory to mankind. In general I get better results from the European countries. It takes time however. Many people liked Doppler Space Time. Unfortunately two years ago I awoke on morning with the realization that the work was not correct. Thus 25 years of my hobby work produced the incorrect sister solution. I should have accepted the Einsteinian solution at the beginning. However this is my hobby. It is fun studying the universe and looking at all the solutions. JG: My learning ended in 1966 after 10 years of night school. It is only a few months ago that I read a book on string theory. I work with my old college text books. I am not interested in the top quark. I am interested in the fundamental building block of the universe. My dot-waves can produce everything but who cares what can be produced in atomic smasheres as more and more energy is added to protons and electrons, etc. Going back to basics, the physics do not understand that the electron merges into the proton to form the neutron. At the radius of the proton 1.32142E-15, the electron reaches a velocity of 0.9186C. This gives it an Einsteinian mass of M = 2.530338 Me thus the Einsteian mass of the electron as it enters the proton is over 2.5 times its rest mass. The 0.9186C is common to all the major subparticles. In my Weidner &Sells physics book the K mesons have a mass of 967Me and decay into 3 pi mesons. Why? Both the U-mesons and the pi-mesons have a velocity of 0.9186C at the neutron radius. The Einsteinian mass/energy is M(u) = 206.84 x 2.530338 Me = 523.375Me M(pi) = 273.23 x 2.530338 Me = 692.19 Me the mass of the proton is 1836.149Me the delta mass between a proton and a K-meson is Delta mass = 869.149Me Four delta masses = 3476.596 Me Two pi-mesons at 0,9186C have a mass energy of two high speed pi-mesons = 1384.38Me Four high speed u-mesons have a mass of four high speed u-mesnons =2093.5Me Total product of surplus energy of 4 neutrons = 3477.88 Me The total difference between the differential mass from the protons destruction and the mass/eneergy of four high energy u-mesons and two high energy pi mesons is Delta energy = 1.284Me This is an error of 0.037 percent. Therefore when 4 protons are hit they produce four K-mesons and six pi-mesons. Alternately a pair of protons and neutrons proved an equalivalent match. It is important to correct the errors of the past. Physicist have overlooked the Einsteinian energy level in all the interactions. They build huge proton destroyers while not understanding that the proton is simply a structure of dot waves very similar to the electron.

JG: No some professors say they will review it. No only tree problems but it cost me $1000 to send out the copies. Some professors stated that they did not understand what I was saying. One was angry I bothered him. Usually I get better results from the European professors as my Doppler Space Time was well regarded. In general I may have to wait 6 months for some responses. JG: I am a theory producer not an evidence producer. The dot-wave is the smallest energy level in the universe. By itself it cannot be measured or detected. There can be no evidence of the existence of the dot-wave. It is beyond normal human comprehension. My mind sees it. I explain what I see. Some people will come to understand what I see. They will come to understand the truth of it. Most will not of course. Most minds are quite limited to what they have been taught or can measure. My mind does not suffer such limitations.