zoe407

I also dislike video "proofs", but never watched them thinking that they are actual proof. But more as another tool of information that if I come across something I didnt hear or read about before, I turn around and research it without going to any sites like youtube Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins130625.html#JvQMIdlGwHT1HiF3.99 To raise new questions, new possibilites, to regard old problems from a new angle, requires creative imagination and marks real advance in science Albert Einstien What kind of person or group would benfit from promoting a psuedo science, but I will take your warning into consideration though. But still think the concept of the SEG itself is still viable, I just haven't gained a true comprehension of it yet, but when I do being deterred by a psuedo science will have no effect on me. Also at the end of the day my hypothesis is that the SEG or sceince and math behind is viable and feasable to the needs of the world, and as with any hypothesis it needs to tested, tested, tested, again and again to remove all possible doubt.

I have another video for you guys, this SEG is a mock up so it is externally powered but they explain their reasoning for this. http://youtu.be/GqPhwuakcLM The link below this text provides some validation of the SEG its not a video, but a technical report. The website rexresearch.com Heres the link: http://www.rexresearch.com/roschin/roschin.htm I hope this information spikes your curiosity, it did for me.

http://youtu.be/5d1GO7rqg6Q This is a link to a youtube video on the SEG it provides some info that, I think is quite interesting. Im not going voice my thoughts on this video, I'm merley posting to see and read your logical and rational opinions on the information contained in the video and sources that pertain to it. P.S Nothing is impossible, unless the state of your mind belives its impossible

Alright ignore what I said about I firmly believe, because my aim was to start a discussion on possible methods of producing a self sustaining generator. The only reason I said I believe it to be possible is because no one has been able to show me any concrete proof that it is not possible. Wind and water turbines are impressive but not efficient because you dont get the actual amount power in which you produce. You tend to lose some power because it is lost as heat, friction, and other things as well.

I cant agree with SEG being a hoax or quantum snake oil because I fermly believe that everything in existance is electrical in some way because of its atomic structure, since everything is made up of atoms and they have an electric charge whether it be positive or negative. How I see it we are surrounded by an invisible web of electrons "just floating around us" every second of the day, so I find it hard to believe that this ocean of electromagnetic energy cannot be harnessed for a plethora of applications.

My question is are any other means to produce a self sustainig power source that is enviroment friendly like SEG (Searle Effect Generator) http://www.searlsolution.com/technology.html I know that SEG is simply a converter of ambient electrons to usable electrons. I basically want to use Proffessor Searle concept but not his design, dont want to copy him.