krash661

lol

deleted.

has my negative point button been disable, it won't let me give negative points to anybody. weird.

did you see greg's link ? " See Pendulum Clock on Wikipedia for more information. ", http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pendulum_clock#Local_gravity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pendulum_clock#Gravity-swing_pendulum

exactly, (everything is relative) there's even experts that fall victim to this. you need some sort of understanding of a quark, to have some sort of understanding of a quasar. (and everything in between)

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/78057-science-is-an-amazing-work-whos-purpose-is-to-explain-gods-creations/?p=761982 dictionary " are genes information ", http://www.genome.gov/search.cfm " What's a Gene? In 1909, Danish botanist Wilhelm Johannsen coined the word "gene" to describe Mendelian units of heredity. As researchers learned more, they began to define genes as a segment of a DNA molecule that contains information for making a protein or, sometimes, an RNA molecule. The term continues to evolve as scientists learn about the complexities of molecular interactions. Listen to some well-known scientists respond to the question, "What's a gene?" ", plus videos from actual reputable scientists respond to the question http://www.genome.gov/27554026 GenomeTV https://www.youtube.com/user/GenomeTV?feature=watch Information(wikki) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information

Genetic code http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_code for more actual reputable references, on genetic code http://cornell.worldcat.org/search?q=genetic%20code&qt=wc_org_cornell http://www.cornell.edu/search/?q=genetic+code&submit=go&tab= http://www.genome.gov/ this last link is probably the best source at this point in time, The Human Genome Project (HGP) http://www.genome.gov/10001772 http://web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/index.shtml there's also these sites also, http://www.genengnews.com/search?q=genetic+coding

according to wikki, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene according to news-medical.net http://www.news-medical.net/health/Genes-What-are-Genes.aspx dictionary according to, Genetics Home Reference http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/basics/gene and many more references if those do not meet standards.

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/72973-comments-on-moderation/?p=753423 http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/72973-comments-on-moderation/?p=754910 Hmmm weird.

this argument is starting to sound very familiar, familiar as to a known crank/ " troll " (what ever that means, funny word) on another site. but i do have to say, i read contradictions that were never realized by the individual. and is continuing to do so. for me, this conversation is done.

lol a link to a dictionary ? do you not have access to one ? i'm sure your pc has one. funny. and also, it's meaningless and irrelevant to anything what you think about me.

not at all. dictionary and that's just a dictionary, there's tons of data on this as i'm sure you know, again, many classifications of. but i will also say, i understand your point.

it appears what is known is only what is allowed to be known to the public and this is what is classified as time in the many classifications of it.

sci - fi can be real more than you think. birth ------> death, beginning -----> end, either way, this is time. and we are in the flow of it

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/78057-science-is-an-amazing-work-whos-purpose-is-to-explain-gods-creations/?p=760936

this needs to be read and understood, all this data, http://home.web.cern.ch/search/node/higgs%20boson%20language%3Aen and, other than that i have to say, there's nothing more going on here other than just plain ole' preaching.

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/77794-why-the-god-particle-answered/?p=758123 and also, http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/77794-why-the-god-particle-answered/?p=758127

hilarious, another negative point, lol typical. i do not understand this site, and i think i had enough of it.

it doesn't matter if time exist or if it does't in a point of view, the bottom line is, there's, birth ------> death, beginning -----> end, either way, this is time. and we are in the flow of it

humanity knows of six dimensions. two below us and three above.

time is a result of neuronal activity of the brain.

the brain has time keeper cells near the core regions of the brain. these time keeper cells create a time cycle that the brain uses this as the standard, by which it compares internal clocks and sensory time. since this arrangement formed naturally, this suggests that space-time is actually time-space, with time having first seat. when humans first started to develop science, they picked distance first, instead of time, because distance was much easier to conceptualize and agree upon as a standard, compared to time. distance is passive and therefore is was easy to measure with a stick or foot using matter. but time was dynamic and more ethereal and therefore not as easy to conceptualize or agree upon as to its nature. even today, time is still nebulous as this topic continues to show. this is why although the brain naturally uses time-space, humans prefer space-time.

there are multiple classifications of time. it maybe best to specify the classification that is being referenced

light follows warp space-time

Extrasensory perception https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extrasensory_perception telepathy extrasensory perception