krash661

how am i continuously receiving negative points on a topic that locked ?

unfortunately, the word weird is not a question, again, this is your own thought to something that never was,you interpreted your own thought to my words. ( again, another form of auto pilot thinking) simple. and i responded with, again, i was not the one who does not understand what a question is, then i gave you an answer that you again did not understand. then became offended when i stated you did not understand. simple, the bottom line is, you did not understand and became offended of it. simple. ridiculous, again, there was no question, it's you not understanding what a question is. lol first, there is no voice, this is what's called typing, second, again, there were no attitude or tone, this is your own thought to something that never was,you interpreted your own thought to my words.

first, i know and understand the conversation, i actually read every post fully, and continue to read it until i know i understand it, simple, and second there were no other questions, i said, " hmm, kind of weird since my profile views are far more greater than visitors by the thousands. but all in all , thanks. ', it was your own mind and choice to think it was a question, then jumped in with your comment, simple. again, this is your own thought to something that never was,you interpreted your own thought to my words. ( again, another form of auto pilot thinking) simple. again, there were no other questions, it was your own mind and choice to think it was a question, then jumped in with your comment. and also, what a nice attempt to talk your way out of it. first, i haven't mentioned any tracking at all at this point and second, which is why i clearly stated (civilly), " i have been tracking this since the day i signed up here ", in the following post. but you had no clue what tracking meant,or did not read the full post or something. yes,because you did not, which i had no problem with so i told about me tracking .i wasn't or not the one who became offended of the words " do not understand ".then, on top of that you still did not understand or stop to think about what tracking means, simple.

it's a matter of auto pilot thinking, i said 27, the first response was , how could that be, there's only 5 showing, if anyone stopped to think, maybe they would have realized, there was another method, so i clearly stated (civilly), " i have been tracking this since the day i signed up here ", since no one stopped to think this. then the result was, it appeared, no one knew what tracking meant. (still on auto pilot thinking) simple. so i posted what it meant then i received negative points, because individuals did not understand, simple, so when they realize they were wrong and offended from being wrong, the result was negative points, like always. lol it's as simple as individuals becoming offended of the " not understanding/comprehending " word, which i find very funny, says a lot about an individuals mentality. and there's a definition for it.

i'm just curious as to what ever happened to this snell guy. i notice this attempt is not used anymore, weird.

track·ing track·ing [tráking] n 1. following of trail: the act or process of following the trail of a person or animal it was the auto pilot thinking that lead to assume i was looking at the list, simple. edit- lol, here comes the hilariously typical negative points. lol always from bias, like what katz and mice stated. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/67349-why-is-there-a-reputation-system/?p=686629 http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/67349-why-is-there-a-reputation-system/?p=686645 edit 2 - lol got to love the low level/average minded. lol when wrong and offended, just resort to negative points.

talk about " assumptions ", you assumed i was using the sites list. and second, i clearly stated " i have been tracking this since the day i signed up here ", before you posted, " Where are you seeing a list of 27 people? This is getting off topic, but I can only show the last 5 visits to my profile as determined in my settings. I created a screen shot showing my settings page along with my 5 latest visitors. I cannot find a setting that allows me to view more than 5 of my last visitors. " which leads to my other post. simple. yes, i did think about that,i do not run on auto pilot all day long. i actually stop and think

lol what's so hard understanding this ?

you lack comprehension, or you do not fully read what i stated. simple. nothing i was just curious after reading some of these post, and was bored and joined conversation.

narrow mindedness. everything always leads to a bigger picture. the subjects out come is based on human mentality and human behavior in a majority with out subject to change. there's at lease 10% truth to everything, more than likely 90% of it is bull shit. nothing more. humanity flows in it's path as it does, and as of this moment in humanity,what is value to it, is what is value to it. nothing more. we as humans decide what is valuable by a majority. nothing more. in the end,there's only 3 thing for human existence that is tangibly or realistically valuable, and those 3 things are, life, intelligence and language, every thing else is just bullshit to keep a majority content. humanity has already failed.

you are not understanding, i have been tracking this since the day i signed up here., i only have 27 people (including you) on the last visit list, i have 4,150 views, that would imply, what you state, that all visitors has visited my profile 208 times each visitor. what i stated makes sense and lines up with numbers.

well that would mean each visitor has viewed my profile 200-250 times each person. to me that does not make sense. edit- i'm wondering if the views are from java script ( hover over name and short profile comes up) and the visitors are the ones who actually clicked on your name to view your profile. that to me makes sense and lines up with the numbers.

hmm, kind of weird since my profile views are far more greater than visitors by the thousands. but all in all , thanks.

what is the difference from Profile Views and Latest Visitors ?

pseudoscience -fixed ideas -no peer review -selects only favorable discoveries -sees criticism as conspiracy -non-repeatable results -claims of widespread usefulness -"ball park " measurement

zimbu, a simple question is, what happens when antimatter comes into contact with matter?

Galaxy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy black holes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermassive_black_hole Astronomical spectroscopy / Red shift: the Doppler effect in light http://www.webexhibits.org/causesofcolor/18A.html Red shift: the Doppler effect in light i asked you numerous times to provide a source and you did nothing more than conveniently side step it again, once again, please provide a source, pseudoscience -fixed ideas -no peer review -selects only favorable discoveries -sees criticism as conspiracy -non-repeatable results -claims of widespread usefulness -"ball park " measurement Prophet12 response, http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=45755&view=findpost&p=617239

you should see this shit on the other forum, lol you know exactly what i'm and alex talking about. refer to post # 7 in this topic. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/77278-universe-expansion-vs-contraction/?p=754545

i have to lean towards the agreement with katz and mice

i asked you numerous times to provide a source and you did nothing more than conveniently side step it again, once again, please provide a source, simple.

once again, please provide a source, simple. for this to be, " Granted the theory is not widely published-distributed yet. But i got a hardcopy from Snell's-group to research " i can not even find a white paper or preprint. which is kind of odd. i can not even find it in review. which is very odd. Snell's-group https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&ie=UTF-8#sugexp=cpsugrpqhmsignedin&gs_rn=17&gs_ri=psy-ab&tok=664XcgFHwsBtboOFu-Ar7A&pq=snell&cp=8&gs_id=c&xhr=t&q=Snell+group&es_nrs=true&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=Snell+gr&gs_l=&pbx=1&fp=6ca84d98d48f74bf&biw=1296&bih=905&ion=1&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&cad=b once again, please provide a source, simple.

this does not exist. it's your own thought. simple. i asked you numerous times to provide a source and you did nothing more than side step it, so i used my access and found nothing. edit- my problem is i can not even find a white paper or preprint. which is kind of odd. i can not even find it in review. which is very odd. it's actually your own thought which explains everything, it explains why i can not find it in peer review ,why i cannot find white paper or preprint, it's literally that simple. Snell's-group https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&ie=UTF-8#sugexp=cpsugrpqhmsignedin&gs_rn=17&gs_ri=psy-ab&tok=664XcgFHwsBtboOFu-Ar7A&pq=snell&cp=8&gs_id=c&xhr=t&q=Snell+group&es_nrs=true&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=Snell+gr&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=6ca84d98d48f74bf&biw=1296&bih=905&ion=1

oh my, so you made your way here huh. anyways, this does not exist. it's your own thought. simple. i asked you numerous times to provide a source and you did nothing more than side step it, so i used my access and found nothing.

i'm actually surprised the conversation went into 20 post, i stopped reading at the third sentence.

so far everything went back to normal on my end.