krash661

that you are fictitious. i thought you were going away.

yes, please do, you are obvious.

what a pathetic joke. this is so obvious, primitive computers and components are not capable of these functions. simple.

if you look over the time machine system, you will see it's primitive components. the computer unit it self is the give away. which i find weird since he came from 2036, which would have non primitive components, they are primitive to today's standards and such. but I'm not sure.

i have the impression of, self promoting but nothing justified to promote kind of topic.

i agree with alex. simple.

logic is depended on the individuals capability.

ok agian, this is not cryptic at all, it's your lack of understanding, the lack is it's obvious you have no clue this word is used to describe " not tell and show all " behavior. simple. again, not cryptic at all, the post above me(if you actually read it) stated about surface of planets, think about planet interiors. again simple.

the problem here is, i'm not " poetic " or " obtuse ", at all. i'm clear in what i stated. it appears the problem is your comprehension. it appears you did not read anything i stated or did not know anything about the references is used, then ran your mouth so quick to rush to a argument. typical.

it's simple, the problem is obvious, which is you do not understand anything i have stated, you are so quick to rush to a argument, just stop and think, simple. edit- it also appears you do not understand the topic and conversation. edit 2 - lol typical, gives me a negative point, funny. grow up.

hmm, interesting, i have not read this or the links yet but i will.

i can feel myself, reaching that stage in the dim future of mankind when the mind will cast off the hampering of the flesh become all thought and no matter.. a vortex, of pure intelligence in space.. it's the goal of evolution, man's final destiny is to become what we imagined in the beginning when we first learned the idea of the angels, but that is far ahead,and I'm impatient to go the whole way. -The Sixth Finger(1963)

planet interiors also, keep in mind, nasa is not transparent.

lol pwagen.. i once came across researcher that stated, european genes

are you referring to carbon 12 ?

depth(dimension) and geometry.

pressure of the core. edit- this image is an example of a massive star

politicians remind me of a bunch of high school kids in a crowed arguing who's the coolest, which leads to violence and such, seriously, not much difference between the two.

for long distance travel or interstellar travel, the problem is not rockets and fuel, but the human element, mainly how to stop individuals from going insane.

check this out, http://workshop.chromeexperiments.com/stars/ taking the tour explains how to navigate the site.

Thursday, June 20, 2013 5:00pm in UTC+02 Google+ Hangout: Watch live on http://youtube.com/CERNTV On 4th July 2012, CERN announced the discovery of a new boson later confirmed to be "a Higgs boson", but which one? Is it the Higgs boson predicted by the Standard Model of particle physics or one of the five Higgs bosons associated with "supersymmetry", a principle that attempts to fix the few remaining problems of the Standard Model? In this week's hangout, theoretical physicist John Ellis (pictured in the banner above) joins experimental physicists to talk about supersymmetry, also known as "SUSY". What is it, why, and how does it link with the Higgs boson? Join this "Hangout with CERN" broadcast live on Thursday 20 June at 17:00 CEST, on CERN's Google+ and YouTube pages, with a recording later available on YouTube. You can post questions in advance in the comments below or on Twitter to @CERN with the hashtag #askCERN. We'll pick the best ones to answer and we may even invite you to participate in the live hangout!

i have no clue if this modification is compatible with your platform but this works really great. Stop Forum Spam http://www.stopforumspam.com/

yes, it's obvious. try to read all my post under this subject, then ponder it for a while. other than that i do not know what to tell you.

when we is used are you referring to humanity ? if so then again, like i said, anthropocentric edit- if you remove anthropocentric, then what is real ?

what makes it one data point ?