PureGenius

The electromagnetic instability is what threw einstien off of his pursuit of Black hole physics. It was too great an unknown during his time surely no fault of his.

Also my name is Shawn James if u would like to endorse my theory or prove it mathematically I have come up with allot more concerning the flow and stability of one side of the Dual Universe again it's great to get feedback from people of different disciplines .

I thought I was on topic swan , but I will refrain from promoting my ideas in other threads . I was just trying to point out how important black holes are to the universes functioning.

Black holes are not dead theyre moving matter and light at speeds in excess of 10 times the speed of light also they have a gravitational potential that keeps galaxy's organized . I aim to prove black holes are in fact the organisers of the dualiverse. I am working on a intergalactic time differential based on my estimated black hole operating speeds.

I would not like to be banned again so I will just say this nonsense is not a scientific term nor is gibberish . I will not discuss this further with acg52.

You have allot to say in a thread you claim to have no reason to believe or support what is your motivation Ac ? Also I find it telling that I was banned for four days for personal attacks against you and now after repeated insults and your still b allowed to continue to in your open ended attack on my education level.

My credentials are knowledge itself my discoveries are well thought out my mathematical skills are limited it seems you have no real argument against my theory but lack of understanding.

This is the same data that would be exhibited if my theory is correct the only difference being the propellant force being a white hole the energy on its way outward.

I think it is your limited opinion of the scope and possibilities within the framework of current sciences that is hurting your ability to mount a reasonable argument. The simple time variances I describe are well within the scope of einstienian physics also all the terms I use are well known to theoretical physicists. You assume too much and your knowledge of the big bang seems to be as limited as your knowledge of relativity. Make an actual argument based on knowledge you actually have in your possession our I can't continue to take you seriously.

Ac I will have to disagree with you on both counts also you have no idea what dark flow is it was only recently discovered .It it's caused by one our universes spiral arms forming.And. your continued insult about word salad makes me think you do not have the knowledge base to understand my theory much less argue the possibility of it I think you should put forth an actual argument against any aspect of my theory instead of repeated personal attacks..

Are we still discussing the possibility of my theory being correct ? Black holes are not speculation and einstiens theory of relativity has been proven in many ways. Also my theory is based on all the current scientific information available .If you really want to know if I'm right look up dark flow it is caused by the black hole at the center of the universe.

I recommend the upanishads , read them carefully they are concerned with consciousness and it's awakening. Also as to rules or a certain personality being present among the enlightened I recommend allot of reading up on ancient cases of enlightenment and the various personalities exhibited . There is no norm among geniuses nor is there any among the enlightened it is a modern fallacy conceived by those who do understand the true nature of either.

Pop I do not think the big bang model is accurate, there is no reason I would want a computer simulation of it.

I was mostly referring to the definition we were all using In this thread also I forgot to add my name to my theory Shawn James. I would really like any help that could be given to figure out if my theory is mathematically provable . I would greatly appreciate any feedback along those lines and thanks again for reading my theory . I'm actually done with the structure of it. Now I'm just working on details and proving it.Also if anyone would endorse my theory that would be great , and perhaps I would consider letting that individual assist with my time modulation electromagnetic field theory just a thought .

It is a matter of definition then if one conceives of a galaxy as it's own universe for example . An unadvanced species with limited tech might by definition think our small galaxy was the whole universe.So it is a matter of getting the right information so we can define the actual physical universe we exist within accurately. My theory has only suggested there are two universes so far but I am still working on it.

The billions of universes idea was only a speculation mostly baseless I agree swan.

Pop. I assure you there is more than one universe if I am correct there could be billions of universes connected by black holes and as to scale an infinite number of sizes from sub atomic to something that would put our universe in perspective As a baseball in the center of our galaxy if it were the only thing contained in that radial space.

I don't think current sciences ,can create a black hole in a laboratory nor can the edge of the universe be seen through any telescope we possess..I am excited about the new telescope being built that will be 156 times more powerful than Hubble . Maybe then we can ascertain the speed of galaxy's at the edge of our universe and if they are in fact moving at the speed of light. Also I have more as I stated, more details as to evidence I'm still working on that but I will try and put my information into a more cohesive format as of now I'm not comfortable posting it . I have pulled my information from many sources so it's difficult to explain but I will try as soon as I can .

No I do not think there is a photon in a galaxy In the observable universe moving in excess of the speed of light . Unless one is referring to the event horizon of say the black hole in the center of a far distant galaxy or our own milky way galaxy . It it's known that internal operating speeds of black holes must be in excess of s.o.l. . Unless they have reclassified the inside of a black hole to observable universe I'm not sure Also. I appreciate the question this forum is awesome.

Only time and my ability to prove it will tell.I also have a theory concerning electromagnetic black holes .

I think all the matter in our universe arrived through a white hole moving at many times the speed of light at this point the matter was slowed enough for galaxy's stars and civilizations to unfold in a normal timeline. As the speed increases exponentially under the pressure of the white holes unbelievable force. This area of the inner universe I have named th the existence zone where time moves like it does now ie an average human lifespan around 80 years . Beyond this point imagine another giant circle this is the speed of light vector or S.O.L.V. for short ,all matter hits 286,000 mps time stops ie human lifespans increase by approximately 1,920 years .Of course up till this point human lifespans will increase gradually . Once the solv is reached I speculate all objects become highly luminous and energised this space beyond the solv I call the high energy output zone. Once all matter begins to exceed the speed of light time may reverse and begin moving backwards but it is not important because at somewhere around this point in space the white hole will become a black hole and reverse spin pulling all the matter backwards through space. Then the matter enters the black hole and it's sped up to many times the solv this energy then arrives at a distant point in space and forms a twin universe. In the space between universes there is what I have termed time mirror this is not barrier but a way to explain the duality of the space time construct .The time differential can be explained by the reversal of time, when matter is sped up to many times the solv time goes backwards so the two universes actually form at the same time vector. As in one universe is going out from the white hole but the universe it is has already arrived at many times the sol before this universe was born. This creates a perfect system that is always renewed through its own circular motions. There is allot of very interesting reasons this theory makes sense .I also postulate that the atomic nucleus of an atom contains a black hole or white hole.This explains Einstein's spooky action at a distance as light can travel ie information between these two distant points Instantly.Through their respective black or white hole. As the ancients used to say microsm macrosm. There is allot more but I will stop here if u take time to read this thank you.

As einstien didn't get a Nobel prize for his theory of relativity and instead for his work on the photoelectric effect you may be quite right I doubt anyone will back my theory and further more I apologize for wasting your time. I am not any kind of schooled scientist. I was having a really bad week and I think maybe I'll just put it in book form that way if someone is interested they can just get v the book. I really don't know why I overreacted so no offense you guys have every right to think I'm wrong.