PureGenius

I'm an amateur , and I've presented my ideas to the best of my ability, I will continue to try and find more evidence to support my ideas. Ireally do appreciate the feedback I just don't know enough mathematics to conclusively explain why my theory makes the most sense. The electromagnetic spiral arms of galaxy's are emitted by the central black hole. These arms are extremely powerful lines of electromagnetic and gravitational potential. I have almost unraveled the inner workings of black holes , once this is finished I believe my theory will be easier to explain.

Ajb I predicted light would become matter at below c. So you want 0m+ c =1m. 1m-c=0m. Matter at the speed of light attains zero mass as matter slows below the speed of light it gains mass and in effect becomes matter. The translation is from light ie energy em propagation, to matter ie the combining of photons to form matter or mass, within the definition of the study I've presented within this thread. I think my prediction is well within the scope of science as this study was recently undertaken, and my theoretical prediction was accurate.This is the paper I was referencing. I will say this I think I may have figured out a way to incorporate higher speeds into relativity . I will state some new postulates. No object can attain infinite velocity. No object can attain infinite mass. Light equals mass at below the speed of light The Mass of any object is equal to zero at the speed of light Mass equals electromagnetic field strength at the speed of light. M c = e=mc2. Xs5 = New e.m field The calculation is this. M= e at c or m=0mass at c = e= Light equals mass at 0 velocity Moving at 1c electromagnetic fields strengthen by 5 times Mass is reduced by 100 percent at the speed of light Time dilation is equal to electromagnetic field strength increase ie 5 times base time Time period at c Xs5= expanded timeframe Exceeding the speed of light, converts mass to energy slowing down below c energy returns to mass so when objects slow below c one reverses all postulates. I am Shawn j. Thanks for reading I think I was right about this one Ajb as far as light becoming matter,i did predict this was the case.

. I think the parameters of my definition exactly fit the outcome of the experiment, matter at c is energy, light at below c is matter. I'm not aware of any discrepancy between the clear prediction made within my high velocity relativity idea. Also Ajb I'm aware of were we are scientifically with photons, although I may not have as much knowledge as you I do understand the principles of light well enough to have made an accurate prediction.

There is a high probability that I'm not going to expand on my theories, beyond the scope of what I've already posted. Based on pictures of deep space and cmbr there is obvious evidence of some rotational velocity. What is more difficult for me to ascertain is the reason for the stabilization of this electromagnetic field , why do galaxy's and thus our universe maintain electromagnetic stasis and are not in a constant state of constant and unstable motion, without the gravitational force provided by the spiral arms, that are inside and outside black holes our galaxy's matter would not be stable enough to support life, i.e. the formation of solar systems etc.

The study at no point discusses rest mass, there is clear indication that light at below c ie slowed by super cold atoms displays properties of mass. It is clearly explained in the paper. The fact is I got this one right, light is matter at below c. They use the term molecules as in photons combining into new forms of matter. The study does state light has properties of matter when slowed below the speed of light. This is my interpretation .

http://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/4178/20130926/new-state-matter-created-fusing-photons.htm

There is no reference point to identify the rotational spin of our universe. Except for the central black hole but our telescopes cannot see to the center of the universe. If our universe is contained within an accretion disk of a black hole, as I think it is we will probably discover that this dark flow ie the large galactic clusters that are being gravitationally attracted to an unknown source. I speculate we should measure the direction those galaxy's are traveling , this is most likely the direction our universe is rotating.To ascertain the center of the universe we can extrapolate the curvature of those galaxy's paths, then drawing out this circle we can pinpoint the center of the universe.

Thanks dog. I appreciate your explanation , it was not intentional, but obviously my mistake.

I'm not sure what I did wrong swan, could you explain what I can't post. Am I just allowed to post links to papers ? I don't understand how it is plagiarism, I posted a link to the whole story in thread.

I was banned for the last seven days I will try and respond to specific questions when I have time to read everything, I appreciate the questions and interest .

Are you minimizing the scientific breakthrough that matter can be created out of photons? Or that I predicted this was the case before this study was done.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12512 This is one of my previous statements Exceeding the speed of light, converts mass to energy slowing down below c energy returns to mass Here is another example of my prediction. Light equals mass at below the speed of light

http://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/4178/20130926/new-state-matter-created-fusing-photons.htm I'm just stating that I did predict this was the case, that light was matter. This is contained in one of my previous posts. This was stated as Light is matter at below c, I Am Shawn j thanks for reading my post.

Maybe I should have further simplified my ideas I think many of my points may have been misunderstood, like the idea of a black hole being created in empty space ie no matter. This is caused by the rotational velocity of the whole universe , this I believe explains a large amount of the unaccounted for mass within the universe .

Yes Ajb I am saying that our whole universe is rotating around a supermassive black hole, this magnetic field defines what I call the electromagnetic expansion distance. Also swan my thread will most likely be locked weather I respond or not as my ideas are not acceptable even as speculations, as the moderators have gone out of their way to point out . I've repeatedly stated my lack of education I cannot understand why a theory is not welcome on a science site.