Klaynos

I'm not sure what you mean by the earth orbiting it? The earth orbits the sun. The moon orbits the earth. Our man made satellites orbit the earth (mostly, some orbit other solar system objects).

Dell do some laptops with Ubuntu installed. As do hp. I was looking a few months ago and they both had a reasonable one for around £175 I think. How occasionally is there photo or video editing? What kind of editing? Do you need a high res calibrated screen for that?

The hardest part is remembering which I'm posting as and referring too... who am I again?

Similar percentage of the population as Mexican born immigrants then.

I was quite surprised to find out in a recent report that I'm a sockpuppet of phi. It was most disconcerting.

Without maths it's almost impossible to do good comparisons. Certainly impossible to do ones where the proposal can be held to account and not just squirm out with a "I didn't mean that". Therefore to answer your prove me wrong request would require you to formulate your idea mathematically. Having said that, your initial comment of electron spin causing energy level changes is just wrong. That's not what happens. Additionally photon emission due to energy level change does not cause the atom to spin. It is also worth noting that when talking about subatomic particles spin normally referres to the intrinsic property of spin not a physical rotation. I stopped reading after that I'm afraid.

Will comsol do it? Been quite a few years. I know it can do acoustic FEM, but something tells me it can do fdtd too. It shouldn't be too different to implement than em, have you looked at meep? A quick google provided this link http://www.k-wave.org/acousticsoftware.php Yes they exist.

This or similar ideas have been poised before (new scientist seems to have an article on a new one every couple of years). As far as I'll aware there is no evidence for any of them and they all stem from modifying the Einstein field equations. To be a theory in physics you would need a mathematical framework that had been thoroughly tested against reality.

! Moderator Note See the last modnote. You failed, don't reintroduce this topic.

But he's asking for a complete project. Which would be plagerisim. Which is why I asked the questions I did.

I was querying as it reads as if the assignment was to create an eBook reader. I appreciate that the PDF format is available, and lots eBook readers use PDF, but an android PDF reader is trivially googelable do I assumed it couldn't just be that.

Sorry, you want to submit an eBook reader for an assignment? You want to put forward someone else's work for your own?

I'd second these sentiments.

Have you considered a control where you select random days (the same number of days as you have earthquake events) and apply the same methodology? It's quite a small data set you're working with, which is to be expected, larger than I feared it might be though. Might be interesting to look at France over a similar period? Similar seismic stability. I think picking somewhere with lots of quakes might make it too difficult.

How many riots and earthquakes? Correlation doesn't necessarily means causation. Do you have a proposed mechanism? Is the mechanism measurable? The correlation is certainly interesting.

None of the above. You were asked a question and your response was to simply repeat that the project is interdisciplinary, I don't actually care about that, lots of things are these days. I just care about your answer.

You can't just shout interdisciplinary and hope all your problems go away. Autocorrect, sorry.

You can't just should interdisciplinary and hope all your problems go away.

Yep.

So your equation should really be X(t)^2 + Y(t)^2 =r(t)^2 That's why you need to clearly define what X, Y and r are and how you derived this equation. I'd strongly recommend reading an introductory waves text book. If you are a mathematician you should have very few problems with it.

We have wave equations we can apply to em waves. In your equation you have shown no derivation not explained what X nor Y are. We have wave equations we can apply to em waves. In your equation you have shown no derivation not explained what X nor Y are.

I'd refer you to my post above. The equation is often the simplest...

In physics, often the "simplest" answer is the mathematical answer. Yet you explicitly object to those replies. Insisting on physics discussions using only English is similar to only dealing with your mechanics for your car through the medium of dance.

It's probably also worth noteing that larger things than electrons have also been observed to have wave-like properties. Buckyballs jump to mind. It's probably also worth noteing that larger things than electrons have also been observed to have wave-like properties. Buckyballs jump to mind.

Mouse is an evolved lifeform, not created. Calling it a creation implies a creator. I'd say that we have tempered far far more in other ways, building houses and roads, selectively breeding animals, cutting down forests over almost all of Europe!