Klaynos

! Moderator Note I've removed the links.

I don't think it's possible to answer your first question. There's nothing in qm that in aware of that would allow for cross universe communication, or even showing if the multiverse interpretation in correct. I'm going to go with no.

! Moderator Note No model, no falsifiability. This doesn't meet our minimum requirements for speculations. Please do not reintroduce this topic.

Around 2USD for a RFID reader module.

Bluetooth tags and GPS devices are more expensive than RFID tags. What problem are you trying to solve?

Does it? Why? Frequency in general is not, energy is not.

! Moderator Note Hyper, this is not the place for your own ideas. Please keep to mainstream science only outside of speculations. Do not reply to this modnote, you may report it if you disagree.

What's the purpose? I used to do lots of UV photolithography, we used rooms with no windows or wood over them. Filters over the lights (always weird walking back into normal lights after a few hours in the clean rooms). For storage/moving around we used metal boxes, aluminium a few mm thick. Even in the low UV rooms we used those boxes as the photoresist would expose with very very low levels of UV and you never knew when someone might use the lithography kit. I'd either try and do it all in a metal box or use foil and cardboard closing the gaps with making and insulating tape.

Aren't we forgetting punch cards? CLI is relatively modern.... Of course these days even software changes can make a big differences, e.g. swipe keyboards of touch screen devices.

What do you mean by imminent, but human standards or earth standards?

In the UK there are sponsored degrees, where they do pay some of your fees and living expenses. These are most commonly the military though. Some companies will also allow/pay fire what are called day release courses where your spend a day a week working on a college or university course. Or part time degrees, several of my friends at work are doing part time PhDs whilst working, supported by us.

Any clue as to what you want to discuss in this thread?

Same for me.

What we need is some experiments involving herring sandwiches.

That's not really true. If you read Maxwell's original books the talks about what we would now call electrons. He just didn't know what they were. I've only scanned the rest of your post but bassed on the original text I've read in not sure I see a point in reading the rest. What are you hoping to achieve with this and for other threads?

! Moderator Note Agree, moved.

It would depend on the precise set up and how you looked. If you could measure the entangled property then yes.

The person looking at b would not know the observation of a had been made.

It is a very common misconception. But it is a misconception.

That's not how entanglement works. Read the replies above. You cannot exert control all you can do is collapse the wavefunction, the knowledge of doing this can only be transferred at the speed of light. Causality is not broken.

No. You can not control anything via entanglement.

I would suggest looking at "free time" distance learning courses. In the UK we have the open university. It's really flexible and has a good reputation.

Dunning-Kruger.

It has several definitions, I'm trying to get to which you're using it as. This is compounded by the number of factual errors, it's difficult to know where to start especially as it seems to make no difference.

That's not really made it any clearer what you mean by logic. Logic to me means... This can be a reference to a third party definition, but it feels like you use "logic" to mean it makes sense to you.