born

again Prof., I gave an answer before even personally for you. Where you did not really ask a viable question at all. Since the answer I gave basically explains(potentially) everything else as well it finally doesnt matter what you make out of it now. Even if you stop thinking at all it doesnt matter. Last time I respond to anything coming from you unless it scratches fields where I am personally "specialised"

if it is yours then yes.

+ Three statisticians are out pig shooting. They see a large boar in the distance, so they jump out of their truck and level their rifles. The first one fires. A cloud of dirt erupts one metre to the left of the pig. The second one fires. A cloud of dirt erupts one metre to the right of the pig. The third one shouts “we got him!” so they jump back into the truck and drive off. for amusement in case humor is allowed in Philosophy while not violating house rules at the same time.

Alright I respect your reminder in order to remain here for a while. If I lose respect I will rebalance that outside of this forum and it's community. A compromise that I am willed committing to. Sir

I don't think so

Noted what you said. Whatever your motivation for this post was I will change it to as well passive-aggressive because that is what it is now. Your are not both - judge and entitled to interfere in what I speak. Now you might be equipped with tools to kick me out of here by reporting and warning and whatever else you have in mind to do if you are incapable to accept the principle of free mind and free speech. I will continue speaking, acting and living - here or not makes no difference.

the faster it gets the slower you think. Didn't even ask a question by yourself, did you? And then the answer is no (your word) I actually also have a question: Why am I Quark now?

I have 2: 1 for you: The ultimate key to everything = Reflection. You can nag on this while still treating it as a rant or you can take the effort and translate it's meaning into your most favorite language (might be maths but probably not) Disclaimer: everything=everything-1 Now this is getting boring to me causing a similar feeling than I had before bumping into this website. Are there some psychologists that are willed to serve breakfast?

language is a bridge and you don't know about sense and time. Semi-scientific hmmm, ok. What's your most important question?

just read again and again and then again and again or not. I have scratched other fields that's true but still playing philosophical rules. Hug the next mirror you can see and measure how long and high your nose points.

lol - you shoot yourself in the knee with every reply. Wonder how you gonna walk 5 miles at all. Well could be done as all you are doing is not leaving the room you are trapped in, still moving around though(in circles and not constantly). No need to continue discussing this with you. Again I don't provoke and if you feel I do then I am apologize for miscommunication.

the smileys weere also directed tof what was written after them but just not quoted according to my choice. The objective reader knows that (or not?). No things have to be moved in order to change or get changed. Philo is good so keep it there (even if you thing it makes personal sense to you to have more of a say which is again no more than speculation anyway) because it is not aggressive and non violent.

First, this is not programming and I for example am not a computer while I know you are also not so the language used (mathematically perverted highschool English?) is not appropriate. Not for this discussion. Drifting a little bit into the field where you are hiding for whatever reason: There is no constant rate of anything. Apply just this claim as an experiment and you will finally find your limits (personally first and universally later - there is no difference). But then you cannot really experiment because you don't know both - where you came from and where you are going to. I use the you not to provoke. Second ....

ideas are good as they structure thoughts. We create ideas conciously or subliminal and we do that always and even without additional stimulation. Wrong and right changes accordingly while permanently swtiching forth-back(conscious-subconcious/self centered-selfish) depending on our level of preconditioning. Moving thoughts driven by emotions. Our real elements are Good-Bad-Right-Wrong and our duties are to seperate them into 2. All the rest is a hobby and nothing else. The secret is none and the answers we all know, being not aware of them for exampla right now doesn't change the fact. Interconnection is the key and this is what we had in the beginning and this is where we are forced to get back to. Us (the power of mind) was created with a bang if you like that explanation. How it really happened is the silliest question ever and it is driven by the root of greed for power to do the same in order to rule, control and therwith abuse every thing else. Interconnection is a multidimensial corps and it explains every topic that develops or was created by ourselves: Culture, Religion, Science, Magic, Love, Hate, Life, Death. Maths is a cage if it has no fixed target. So is money(a tool to connect in a good way or a curse to destruction - starvation and war). Life is and our(human) will is allowed to stay - so far.

I like that one with the current scientific consensus so let me try to translate universally: more than 1 idiot in the same room. How's maths going to react to an insult ? Maybe(in case there are only 2 scientists)..... they start trying to break π or prime numbers. According to the "rules" that are commonly tolerated these days there are 2 ways: explaining them as they stand or ignoring them as a rule while accepting them as a law. Silly but still challenging in this case for example would be: writing down any of them and adding a comma with the purpose to break...... Then we(the neutral observer witnessing the insulted) will have to leave mikro and slide into makro seeing the boys starting to break their heads by never stopping to write after the comma again. Now that's not the end because there are still 2 scientists in the room(even when only their minds are really present) who both want to be better and faster than the other one powered by the same motivation (kicking the insulters ass hypothetically) so we need to add imagination(giving them some credit out of curiosity) and here we go next. What they write on the paper is not enough so they need to put the writing into another dimension (otherwise it cannot travel and it really has to - so we support them out of mercy now). We are there and ready to expand their writing to touch the end of the room. It breaks through the roof ( ) and goes it's way just straight like no familiar line could be more precise describing it. It goes and goes and the hole in the roof is so big that both scientists can see the journey of the stream (what a wonderful creation ). It accelerates so fast that just the eyes alone cannot follow and causes both heads to start spinning so the scientists have to sit down on a chair(needing 4-6 legs instead of xx), exhausted but still feeling challenged and excited no less desperate though to be first (both of them but no way together). Suddenly(Time ceased to exist as they both are in a mindstage of agony/resurrection) from the bottom of one chair the stream breaks through it and peaks one of them where it usually hurts most. Lucky enough he jumps up and what he sees is the last number has arrived after going through all, each and everything. The number is 1 but the problem is that both can see it clearly at the same time. So it istantly creates further tension: Who was first or who was faster or might it just mean that it all comes from 1 or through 1 and if that's a sort of result in the first place should it be shared or broken again or hidden..... or does it actually have a meaning at all? What does the other one think?? 2nd way would be to ignore my statement and calling me back as the bigger idiot but that again would create a new problem, not mine though because I had good fun writing this. And sorry for my absence at highschool Morality of the story: lead if you can but ruling you must not. Show some respect if you want to be respected. Don't hurt just because you were. In addition: Pi was a joke as it should already point to that there is no end after the comma. Still there was the chance that one of the 2 is a bit smarter than the other by skipping the start of stupdidty before it begins - again.