Windevoid

Why don't we have magic powers? Any thoughts on this?

I don't think the universe can happen. It doesn't make sense. There's no source of differentiation.

I don't think you could patent this stuff. The things would be too close to existing motor and generator technology. The competitors would be everywhere even if you could patent it. The motor-generator idea is everywhere on YouTube and off. Other ideas are, too.

Basis for how to build a "free energy" "overunity" motor-generator? I haven't checked every part, but I think this works as a basis for a self-running motor-generator. Electromagnets/coils/solenoids/inductors with different strengths as the magnets/electromagnets they pull defy the Lenz-law-following-Newton's-third-law-and-following-the-Law-of-Conservation-of-Energy. One line of wire powered by x watts makes y magnetism, enough to move a compass. But a coil of wire (solenoid/inductor/electromagnet/coil) of 100 or so turns makes enough magnetism to move a motor armature or a ceramic two-inch-by-one-inch-half-inch-deep magnet, while still using about the same x watts. So more turns of wire, then, means more energy created for x watts. You just connect the motor created as such to a generator of sufficient efficiency, and produce more energy than you consume. More details: "STARGATE MOTOR FULL DEMO" "SELF CHARGING?" "Origins of Energy Synthesis by Professor Eric Dollard" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UA2tLgL0HqE "Secrets of Anti-Gravity Technology" "emV014: Newton's 3rd Law is Bunk"

I just watched this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nc0U9PawusY Do Plants Really Take Things From the Environment in Order to Grow? Or can they make their own stuff (not just photosynthesis). Can a plant grow in a sealed container with no air and nutrients, just a little water to signal the plant to grow?

If all terms of the equation E=mc2 are in an equation, then, that means all terms are the same unit. Hence, all terms should be energy and have mass. So light (as energy) would also have mass. (Unless light is not an energy.) Thus light could not be massless.

But then what would be the cause of consciousness?

Or maybe there was never "nothing" maybe there was always "something", like zero point energy.

Is everything a bubble in the ocean of space? It would explain inertia and the reflection of light. Maybe it's crazy, maybe it's not. I think Stan Deyo and Tesla said similar things, as well as Nova on PBS.

Is the so-called "Law of Attraction" the answer to all philosophy? Being the "cause of all events" and all. With memory and time being important components?

Isn't momentum mass times velocity?

Uh, then its mass would have to increase. If E=MC squared then light would have to have mass, but then it couldn't do the things that light is said to be able to do, because that is dependent on light not having mass.

Why not? Would it gain mass and not be light? But it's non-massy light right? Or not? Paradox? Why not? Would it gain mass and not be light? But it's non-massy light right? Or not? Paradox? And there's another reason to believe relativity is wrong. It's the only "science" to have paradoxes, and in such quantities.

if light were to get sucked in by a black hole, then wouldn't it go faster than light?

Has anyone tried to move something faster than light? Has anyone tried to go faster than light? Or have they only used light itself. I mean, water waves from the same source seem to go at the same speed regardless of source, but a jet plane can go faster than water waves and it doesn't do some voodoo thing.

I always thought relativity seemed ridiculous, like something a bad writer made up to cover a plot hole. I don’t think relativity makes sense. I might be wrong, but can I really be wrong about this?

I tried asking this question to 8 or so answer site and didn't get anything I can use, only cosmological/origin answers. So here goes, What is the cause of existence? Why do some things exist and others not? If I can move "something A" and put "something B" where the "something A" used to be, then why wasn't the "something B" there instead of the "something A" in the first place? Maybe time is involved somehow.

Does Logic Actually Not Work All of the Time? Suppose there is a plastic bottle of pills with 100 pills on your counter in your house. You take 50 of the pills out of the bottle, and you stick them into a different empty paper container. You then close the plastic pill bottle. You then move the paper container that you had put 50 pills into to somewhere else or destroy or burn it. You then walk outside your house and close the opaque door. Now let's evaluate the situation at this moment: You can't see the 50 pills in the plastic pill bottle. You can't hear the 50 pills in the plastic pill bottle. You can't smell the 50 pills in the plastic pill bottle. You can't taste the 50 pills in the plastic pill bottle. You can't feel the 50 pills in the plastic pill bottle. Yet you know that they're there, and based on experience, when you check, the fifty pills will at least as far as I know, always be there. How can this be and how can you know the amount or existence of the pills in the plastic pill bottle? Does this affect resource estimates or the Schrödinger cat? More instances: 1. A room in a hotel costs x. The minibar is in the room. The minibar probably has no warning signs. Therefore the items in the minibar are free. 2. There is no reason why object x is in front of me instead of object z, and no reason object z can't be in front of me, but object x alone is in front of me, so logic is wrong. 3. Any explanation of reality would require further explanation or be inside something else in order to exist, but then reality would be indefinite. It would therefore have no definition. It therefore can't exist.

Is Relativity Wrong? I see in all of these space and physics documentaries on TV that Einstein-this Einstein-that. But then I saw that there are lots of YouTube videos claiming to disprove special relativity and/or general relativity. Videos such as: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=em6ukitZ9wE Is there any truth to these claims? If relativity somehow is true, then how can it be claimed to be false so much in so many different ways by so many different people?

Does the ballpoint pen match current theories of physics, or does it defy pressure, conservation of mass, etc. ? The pen I was using does appear to eventually run out of ink, but it seemed to take way too long to run it out. Maybe this is just crazy. Maybe the ball point of the pen makes more ink by spinning ink?

What does the smiley face mean?............It's kind of creepy when I don't know whether it's smiling or smirking. No Repost Without Large Spaces Is Current Electricity Theory Wrong? And/or Could Free Energy be Real? With Possible Explanation/(s) (Warning!……Somewhat Technical) A steel fork does not make spark when touch either side of a battery. Connecting either side of a battery to a steel fork via wire does not make sparks. Sparks occur when circuit stops being fully complete with enough voltage (about 2.7 volts) (2 AA NIMH). (untested) Capacitor charges (only when circuit is near complete separated only by the gap between the plates) Battery-provided electricity lights up an LED through a capacitor (all components in the same series circuit). Battery doesn’t repel or attract steel silverware. Battery voltage decreases over time with use (not new). Battery-created electrical energy can go through a capacitor to light up an LED to the same brightness as when the capacitor isn’t in the circuit at all. Nickel-Metal Hydride battery self-recharges for a minute of use whenever it run out. Multimeter results/measurements appear to defy entropy by going up. Putting the multimeter test lead wires next to each other seems to cause increase as well. A battery terminal connected to a spoon-sized piece of metal creates an AC voltage of around 80-200 millivolts. Still ceramic magnet touched by leads to a multimeter heavily affects the voltage up to 200 or more millivolts either direction. Electric fan voltage defies Newton’s Third Law by only going down to 2.3V from 2.7V. Parallel circuit LED brightness defies explanation, stays the same even with at least 9 resistors all in their own circuits parallel to LED. A hand-crank-generator-flashlight I unscrewed ran an LED in parallel with 8 resistors or so and a capacitor as easily as just the LED. The LED didn't seem dimmer as far as I remember. (The last observation was not included in any manuscripts.) Opinions and Possible Explanations It would seem that the magnitude of the Lenz Law is a seventh or less of what it should be. It would seem that rather than just electrons moving, some unknown “force” or “fluid” drags electrons, and the “fluid” can go right through the insulation on capacitors. Then perhaps capacitors, batteries, and maybe even magnets, can create energy by charging and discharging. In today's science, there is this "Law of Conservation of Energy". And all motion is supposedly kinetic energy and comes from potential energy. But I noticed one day that in Newton's three laws of motion, motion is created not by energy or potential energy, but by an "unbalanced force". And I remember that fridge magnets can give off "endless" force apparently without any electrical energy input. So, wouldn't it be theoretically be possible to break the "Law of Conservation of Energy" using this "force-energy gap"? Maybe it's possible, with capacitors/solenoids/electromagnets/batteries to get more energy out of output force plus waste energy than total energy put in. Then: Work (energy) is FD∙cos(ө) But, if a machine can move magnets and/or coils by changing the force without moving a magnet or a coil, by, say, changing polarity like a motor, or turning on and then off repeatedly, then maybe it can do work without using work, or by using very little work (only enough to move electrons a small distance). And perhaps all motors create energy, just by being pulse/polarity-dependent devices. Notes I tried to send this to 7 peer-reviewed journals, but they all rejected it eventually. I’m starting to wonder, then, whether peer-reviewed journals are really as good and important of a news source as scientists and other people seem to think they are. More I have a digital multimeter that I am using with a battery. First, I tried to run the battery out of as much voltage/energy as I could. My multimeter said about 12mv or 6 mv. The battery's voltage wouldn't seem to hit and stay at zero. I then took it out of all circuits it was connected to. Then I let it sit there for several days. for the first day or 2, It only went up to about .1V and seemed to be staying more or less around there, consistent with what I would expect of a capacitor effect. But then on day 5 and 6, I checked the battery, and it said .895V and was at 1775 or so microvolts. I then tried to run that out of amps and on the next day it was right back there at .893-.892V." Suggestions I created a solenoid coil of about 85 turns ( a normal coil that would move toward or away from a magnet when on and under enough amps). I tested it, and it ran the same amperage when running far away from a magnet (about a foot away) as when running right next to it. The solenoid used only 1 ohm while the LED I had used about 200 kohm. Also. I learned in DC electrics class, if I am remembering correctly, that magnetic force of a wire/solenoid is dependant on amps and turns of wire, not volts or power. So I could presumably run AC current through a transformer and maybe or maybe not a diode to get equal force out of less power. Although the LED I was using seemed to limit amps and prevented the solenoid from working, maybe more amps or power than the 4 batteries I had could force the solenoid to work. Maybe not.

Then perhaps I just noticed it three months ago? I mean, they're for-profit businesses. They probably won't just do science on their devices when they already make and test them against saltwater and mechanical forces.

I don't know. Has anyone else checked how fast a fan runs compared to the battery or AC energy? I don't know and I don' have the tools to check and make decisions about the actual fan speed in real life.

The USGS has a mineral deposit map viewable in Google Earth. And Minex Consulting has discovery and mining data.

I mean, if resources were going to run out, then we would have mined all of a resource after about 4-12 years, but we are still ale to mine/get these resources!