Windevoid

The fans would still run, and the wires and bulbs, too. The fan would just run 7 times faster than it should assuming this posted theory is right.

I don't know for sure, but what if there isn't a limit on oil at all? What if quantum mysticism is right? What if there isn't a limit on gold or silver or platinum either? I mean humans have made jewelry since at least the time of the Celts but probably back to the Egyptians, but we're sill using and having gold! And it's still plentiful enough to be sold in stores and jewelry shops! Same with silver! What if there's no such thing as a nonrenewable resource?

No it doesn't.

Maybe the universe doesn't obey the law of thermodynamics and the magnitude of the Lenz Law is a seventh or less of what it should be.

Sorry about the spaces, they weren't in my Microsoft Word document, the pasting system wanted me to paste in a box instead of the actual window. It also jammed many words together.

I wouldn't call it out just yet. My LED has been running 9 complete days on 2 AA rechargeable batteries.

Is Current Electricity Theory Wrong? And/Or Could Free Energy be Real? With Possible Explanation/(s) (Warning!……Somewhat Technical) A steel fork does not make spark when touch either side of a battery. Connecting either side of a battery to a steel fork via wire does not make sparks. Sparks occur when circuit stops being fully complete with enough voltage (about 2.7 volts) (2 AA NIMH). (untested) Capacitor charges (only when circuit is near complete separated only by the gap between the plates) Battery-provided electricity lights up an LED through a capacitor (all components in the same series circuit). Battery doesn’t repel or attract steel silverware. Battery voltage decreases over time with use (not new). Battery-created electrical energy can go through a capacitor to light up an LED to the same brightness as when the capacitor isn’t in the circuit at all. Nickel-Metal Hydride battery self-recharges for a minute of use whenever it run out. Multimeter results/measurements appear to defy entropy by going up. Putting the multimeter test lead wires next to each other seems to cause increase as well. A battery terminal connected to a spoon-sized piece of metal creates an AC voltage of around 80-200 millivolts. Still ceramic magnet touched by leads to a multimeter heavily affects the voltage up to 200 or more millivolts either direction. Electric fan voltage defies Newton’s Third Law by only going down to 2.3V from 2.7V. Parallel circuit LED brightness defies explanation, stays the same even with at least 9 resistors all in their own circuits parallel to LED. A hand-crank-generator-flashlight I unscrewed ran an LED in parallel with 8 resistors or so and a capacitor as easily as just the LED. The LED didn't seem dimmer as far as I remember. (The last observation was not included in any manuscripts.) Opinions and Possible Explanations It would seem that rather than just electrons moving, some unknown “force” or “fluid” drags electrons, and the “fluid” can go right through the insulation on capacitors. Then perhaps capacitors, batteries, and maybe even magnets, can create energy by charging and discharging. In today's science, there is this "Law of Conservation of Energy". And all motion is supposedly kinetic energy and comes from potential energy. But I noticed one day that in Newton's three laws of motion, motion is created not by energy or potential energy, but by an "unbalanced force". And I remember that fridge magnets can give off "endless" force apparently without any electrical energy input. So, wouldn't it be theoretically be possible to break the "Law of Conservation of Energy" using this "force-energy gap"? Maybe it's possible, with capacitors/solenoids/electromagnets/batteries to get more energy out of output force plus waste energy than total energy put in. Then: Work (energy) is FD∙cos(ө) But, if a machine can move magnets and/or coils by changing the force without moving a magnet or a coil, by, say, changing polarity like a motor, or turning on and then off repeatedly, then maybe it can do work without using work, or by using very little work (only enough to move electrons a small distance). And perhaps all motors create energy, just by being pulse/polarity-dependent devices. Notes I tried to send this to 7 peer-reviewed journals, but they all rejected it eventually. I’m starting to wonder, then, whether peer-reviewed journals are really as good and important of a news source as scientists and other people seem to think they are. More I have a digital multimeter that I am using with a battery. First, I tried to run the battery out of as much voltage/energy as I could. My multimeter said about 12mv or 6 mv. The battery's voltage wouldn't seem to hit and stay at zero. I then took it out of all circuits it was connected to. Then I let it sit there for several days. for the first day or 2, It only went up to about .1V and seemed to be staying more or less around there, consistent with what I would expect of a capacitor effect. But then on day 5 and 6, I checked the battery, and it said .895V and was at 1775 or so microvolts. I then tried to run that out of amps and on the next day it was right back there at .893-.892V." Suggestions I created a solenoid coil of about 85 turns ( a normal coil that would move toward or away from a magnet when on and under enough amps). I tested it, and it ran the same amperage when running far away from a magnet (about a foot away) as when running right next to it. The solenoid used only 1 ohm while the LED I had used about 200 kohm. Also. I learned in DC electrics class, if I am remembering correctly, that magnetic force of a wire/solenoid is dependant on amps and turns of wire, not volts or power. So I could presumably run AC current through a transformer and maybe or maybe not a diode to get equal force out of less power. Although the LED I was using seemed to limit amps and prevented the solenoid from working, maybe more amps or power than the 4 batteries I had could force the solenoid to work. Maybe not.