AdrianB

Just to give you an update on John Searls S.E.G..... Not bad work eh! (not looking to start this all off again but thought it would be nice for others to see the work put into the S.E.G) edited to add this media found of a presentation of John Searl.... http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8635897559220353909&ei=yo_hSs6tMqb22gKx5Zz1DA&q=john+searl+presentation#

I will shut up and never hassle you again, sorry for the inconvenience. I just wanted to make this open source really, maybe one day someone could take the idea and make something different. If its wrong or right it makes no difference to my life. Have fun all

how many times can one person say "You are wrong" in one thread. Venus Mass 4.868 5 × 1024 kg Surface area 4.60 × 108 km² Orbital period 224.700 69 day Average orbital speed 35.02 km/s Surface temp. Kelvin Celsius min mean max 735 K[1][6][7] 461.85 °C Venus has totaly different mass variations, which of course means different magnetic behaviour. Hey! I know, I know nack all about anything, I am just enjoying the conversation, it is fun, Sorry if you all feel the need to get uptight and start insulting me. It doesnt matter though does it! really, I mean even if I could afford to prove free energy exsist, it would be no good anyway would it. No one really wants free energy, as it doesnt pay, does it. So chill, have a laugh at me, its ok. No one is really listening to me or reading this "nonsense".

The faster a mass is spinning the greater the Electromagnetic field is, if a mass is spinning at such a speed then the EM field becomes unstable, as the mass is trying to emit a greater field then its mass velocity can handle. So it bursts, like a bubble only not with the same effect, (rips and tears apear then it just evaporates, untill the mass slowed down to a point where a new field can be produced.) Also quiet possibly, a mass could spin at such a speed it would create a second heavier field from within. (a bit like a ripple effect)

Gravity pushes inwards in on the planet. it does pull down but as the a mass increases its spin, it does force inwards on the mass, forcing the EM field properties to push outwards.

Is the planet not made of iron ? Does this not create a charge at velocity or would this not create an electromagnetic field at high spin ? Merged post follows: Consecutive posts merged

you all speak out gravity and electromagnetism as if they are two seperate things... For you to have gravity on a planet you have to have an electromagneticly charged atmosphere. For you to have electromagnetism you have to have motion and gravity. The faster a planet spins the more energy is created, the higher the static charge is on the surface, the greater the static charge, the greater the gravitational pull is on the planet, as more oxygen is produced, the greater the preasure is within the atmosphere. Free energy is everywhere, we live in an electricaly static charged atmosphere. This is how I know free energy can be produced. Gravity and electromagnetism work hand in hand with each other.

May I ask why dont are planets fall out of our solar system. They are trapped in the suns field of electromagnetism, pulsed in and out through the flux of the suns field outside the solar system.

Our Galaxy should be proof enough to you. The earth orbits the sun at high velocity, it is not a perfect circle it is squashed, the earth is spinning at such speed it has its own.... Ion Electromagnetic gravitational field emitting from within to fold outwards this creates what we know as our atmosphere, This protects our sorry arses from been burnt from the suns rays. The moon is trapped in our orbit spinning off axle, so it is constantly moving back and forth in and out of the planet. This creates the atmosphere to shift within the planets field, with this shift is also the shift in heat and temperature across the surface, this creates static in the already charged atmosphere, resulting in lightening storms. So the interaction between two spheres can create electricity. The movement or shift of electromagnetic fields within fields creates electricity. The motion of many rings spinning around few is the same replication of our solar system, the electromagnetic gravitation orbit that each planet is spinning on is the same as SEG searls design but compressed with many planets.

Just because you keep denying it doesnt mean it will go away. Yes free energy is everywhere mate.

The magnetic field that is in flux around the mass would stop the interaction of outside laws regarding gravity and heat issue. As it would create its own electromagnetic gravitational field, from which it will have its own gravitational laws from within. All outside influences would have no interfearance with the traveling mass.

If a mass is stationary when traveling through space, it will create drag and will have a limited amount of forward motion. If a mass is spinning whilst in motion of going forward, then its electromagnetic field is changed and the mass has its weight value changed. This would enable the mass to accelrate faster then the stationary mass. If the mass is classed as a solid object then it will create more drag and become slow. If we accept that solid mass does in fact change shape at high speeds (the concord increased in length at high speed) then we can theorise that indeed mass can infact accelerate upto the speed of light. If in a motion where the electromagnetic field can be changed. e=mc2 is right but if you include the notion of the electromagnetic field of all mass's and the fact it can be in a state of flux whilst in motion, then a mass can travel/move in different ways and faster then the internal combustion engine as it is not having to deal with weight of the mass.

I am just replying to this thread, I am trying to be as amicable and polite as I possibly can. If people throw insults, chastis and start discriminating and categorizing others about their ideas, why is wrong to throw it back. I am not trolling.

goodbye, thank you for your help. "You know some would say that with this been the thread that I started, it is you who would be classed as trolling" Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedEmpirical Equation Relating Electromagnetism and Gravity in terms of Electromagnetic Waves, Fields and Particles http://www.groupkos.com/docs/russell_montgomery/Empirical_Equation_Relating_Electromagnetism_and_Gravity_in_terms_of_Electromagnetic_Waves-1.pdf Dimensional/Gravitational Symmetrical Model for Particles and Gravity in terms of Electrodynamics http://www.groupkos.com/docs/russell_montgomery/Optimistically_we_have_derived_a_quantized_expression_between_electromagnetism_1b.pdf About strange effects related to rotating magnetic systems http://www.rexresearch.com/roschin/pitkanen.pdf

Really!!!!!! ha ha ha ha http://www.searlsolution.com/members/documents/STbook18E.pdf

And if Prof John Searl flew over you in one, landed and ran over to you, happy slapped you in the face. I bet you just say "that never happend, I saw nothing!"

Never! The theory goes that when a mass is at high velocity, its electromagnetism field changes, if you have two mass's with there electromagnetism fields connected, then they will be locked with each other. (the moon is locked into our orbit) This is how the SEG can move the smaller rings around the larger one without them causing friction. The Inverse Gravity Vehicle, works on the theory that if you have an external motion of mass, spinning faster then the present mass it is sat on. The smaller spinning mass will move away from the larger one, due to the change in the electromagnetic fields, as the smaller mass's spin increases. using the earths own electromagnetic fields to create lift. Maybe you should start reading some Sci-fi

How far down the rabbit hole do you want to go......? http://www.searlsolution.com/technology3.html Inverse Gravity Vehicle (IGV)

So is Prof John Searl a fraud along with Tesla and Perendev. These and many more great names from history are frauds because you choose to be more open minded about space then you are on earth Mr Insane Alien. The reason why no one will ever acept the possabilities of free energy is because it doesnt provide a source for weapons and the trade of arms. It gives them the excuse to tell you that creating energy is costly. That disposing of the waste is costly, the world is turned around this notion, EVERYTHING. If electric was free then no one would buy gas or oil, as everything would be electric. The only reason a country would have to build a nuclear power station is to create weapons. But there is far too much money involved in this wastfull world of greed. Free Energy is everywhere, from Electromagnetics to natural resources.

You would need three sources of power If I gave you £1 and then you gave me £10 and I walked away, I have just got £9 for free, you amplified my £1 - £10.

I never said anything about feed their output back into themselves... I said the power stations feed the initial energy into the Surge Effect Electric Generator. It is a way to increase an already provided current, (that is if it isnt already been used)

Grandted if the two were merged together instantly after amplification. By the time though the voltage and the amp is collected it would be constant and manipulated to provide the required burst.