Jump to content

truedeity

Senior Members
  • Posts

    116
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by truedeity

  1. I really must put this into a general category because no other category on this form is related to actual science in my view, in fact all of the standard model, cosmologies of science is repugnant. Thus, i pose this topic as a general science topic. All of the universe is electrical / magnetic in nature, I know that all moving bodies in space can be described as a form of electromagnetism not gravity. Primary solar rays as Tesla described are emitted by the sun and are harmonic and relativistic explanations that the sun is governed by a underlining from of nature that exists in the universe through the media, as understood to be electricity. The sun is of plasma, which is its own fundamental form of mater created via electricity, electromagnetism, etc.. as is our sun, and I would speculate that sunspots are more-less gaps of plasma being pushed apart by magnetic flux. furthermore, the standard model does a horrible job explaining away the sun. this explanation implies the beauty of God. you guys out there who waste your time with long division better remember this.
  2. I'm not a scientist, but I love science. And I believe in Evolution. I also believe in God. I personally do not think that there has to be a separation of the two. But I will keep my opinion as simple as can be. How can you believe in God, and Evolution at the same time? Well i'd like to introduce myself by saying that i'm computer programmer. And as you might know there are many ways to write a program. You can write a program the "dumb" way without object oriented structure and using only LOC (lines of code). Or you can write a program the smart way and include object oriented programming models that can be reusable. In my view, Evolution is like a bit-of-automation in that regard. Belief in God and Science is not impossible. How you define God is irrelevant. Many people on this forum will ask, "well which god do you believe in, allah, boodah, etc.." But to leave the definition static, I will just leave the definition as an "undefined primary creator." Alternatively, if you believe in God as most fundamental Christians do, then he is a ruthless, egoistical deity. How can the fundamental christian version of the biblical God allow for Genocide, Rape, Torture to exist? If your answer is "Free Choice", then my question is how did the intention for original sin begin? aim-hackintoit
  3. Just out of curiosity how many "we" is there on sf? Ok. I understand your points. You make them very well. But don't suggest that I don't read alot on this subject. I just have a different viewpoint. Or maybe i'm not describing the my particular perspectives accurately. I admit, the example I gave is quite a crude one. Maybe its not possible that someone can literally observe enough to create major changes. But I do believe that there is a "shared observation" taking place that could amount for something? But it also begs the question how much observation is taking place at all? And what is it really? Is it limited to only what we measure quantum physics experiments? My speculation is that it occurs always, and has less to do with human sensory, or equipment sensory for that matter... Please turn your attention to 'A Universe From Nothing' by Lawrence Krauss, AAI 2009" with particular attention to his comments regarding a universe of 'natural selection', we know what natural selection is in nature. He further states that evolution exists as a component of this natural selection. I think in my video i made a comment regarding the universe "hiding its singularity" as further clarification on that this is what i mean. In maybeverse I explain that if there is an array of possible universes that exist, but only 1 exists. This in sorts is my interpretation of expressing that natural selection exists as some cosmic function. And below references of how consciousness is only 1 particular aspect of observation. Stuart Hammeroff Here is from http://www.quantumconsciousness.org/ A place for consciousness in nature Consciousness defines our existence and reality, but the mechanism by which the brain generates thoughts and feelings remains unknown. Most explanations portray the brain as a computer, with nerve cells ("neurons") and their synaptic connections acting as simple switches. However computation alone cannot explain why we have feelings and awareness, an "inner life." We also don't know if our conscious perceptions accurately portray the external world. At its base, the universe follows the seemingly bizarre and paradoxical laws of quantum mechanics, with particles being in multiple places simultaneously, connected over distance, and with time not existing. But the “classical” world we perceive is definite, with a flow of time. The boundary or edge (quantum state reduction, or ‘collapse of the wave function”) between the quantum and classical worlds somehow involves consciousness.
  4. I have a article on this that is still "in the works", ignoring the section about tesla from this link( http://whoarethegreys.com/norway-spiral-explained.html ) can someone dispute my claim that it wasn't an EISCAT experiment named Tequila Sunrise? I think they had modulated the magnetosphere with a combination of specific ELF or VLF frequency... prob. to study weather conditions, or a possible display of level of intelligence by the Russian govt. if at all it having something to do with obamas nobel prize?
  5. Ok moneypoo you got me again. Hands up. I'm arrested. I guess you've had enough truedeity chasing anyway...I did kinda skim over the thread, because I really have read all of the evidence about it being a missile. The day it appeared on CNN. In my defense, I did support the fact that I thought it was a Russian Missile in the link I provided. But I also injected a cute wormhole theory, just to substantiate it as a topic to match the theme of my website. But I never stated that it was connected to the Norway Spiral incident. And, It's very hard to provide a reference for a memory of something you hear on the radio. And no I don't expect that it should be admitted to be anything more than opinion. Unless I can provide a viable reference. But that doesn't mean i'm not allowed to mention a memory. Providing a reference sometimes can be annoying for someone who has already studied. You cant just stereotype something as nonscience just because it doesn't come packaged with a reference. Let's say for example, you've never heard of string theory. And you call it non-science. And you say if it is science provide a reference. But for some reason I cant find a reference to support string theory. Even though there are plenty of references for string theory... So what if someone says something and it gets moved to speculation, and then later that person finds viable references? Then its the mods job to take on the humiliation and move it into the right category. And i'll be so happy if that day comes to you money poo! ---- Another example of a theory that has no viable reference evidence, but could be just as viable as any scientific theory is. The Dynamic Theory of Gravity of Dr. Nikola Tesla.... He explains the relation between gravitation and electromagnetic force as a unified field theory (a model over matter, the aether, and energy). It is a unified field theory to unify all the fundamental forces (such as the force between all masses) and particle responses into a single theoretical framework. Tesla said he had fully developed his Dynamic Theory of Gravity and "worked it out in all the details". This aether-based theory, which initially was developed between 1893-94, explained gravity and directly linked it to electromagnetic phenomena, explaining also that the sun and all stars emit "primary solar rays" which in turn produce secondary radiations. Tesla's theory states that the phenomena produced by electromagnetic forces is the most important phenomenon in the universe. According to portions from his theory, mechanical motions are universally a result of electromagnetic force acting upon and through media. Unfortunately, no mathematical details of the theory have officially surfaced. Because his work on this theory did not surface, does that mean it does not exist and Tesla was spewing hot air? I think that's possible. But Not likely... He could have given those documents to someone he trusted for safe keeping. The US govt. could have confiscated it and used it for technology research? All i'm saying is that we just have a theory. Just because their is support for a theory does not make it true, it just makes it popular. Consider that the popular opinion is not always the best choice. This was proven when Gary Kasprov defeated The World in a game of chess on a Vote-Per-Move basis. I'm really just in the middle of the road on this one. ----------- I'm not sure if this is the right reference for the invisible jet. Most likely is? http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3A27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3A3a3730f4-c5f9-475c-be42-1fdc18846c1b&plck “We have seen rockets being launched from northwest Russia, and from the rocket range in Kiruna in northern Sweden, and from the neighboring Andenes in northern Norway, but nothing like this.” - Truls Lynne Hansen, Dir., Tromso Geophysical Observatory, Norway After the Russian government's denial on December 9, 2009, that it had not conducted any missile tests that could explain the white and blue light spirals over northern Norway, today on December 10, 2009, the Russian Defense Ministry now says a Bulava ballistic missile launch from the Russian Navy nuclear submarine “Dmitry Donskoi” in the region had failed. However, the Russian Defense Ministry would not confirm any connection with the white and blue spiraling lights over northern Norway. Adding to the mystery is Norway's concern that its government had no prior communication from Russia that any such missile tests were scheduled near northern Norway. Another speculation has been microwave tests of the ionosphere from Tromso, Norway, impacting the atmosphere in an unexpected way. But, ionospheric physicists in Gakona, Alaska; Arecibo, Puerto Rico; Tromso, Norway; and other facilities have been bouncing microwaves off the ionosphere for at least a decade of research. Any oscillation that humans produce in the ionosphere is immediately obliterated as soon as sun rays shine on any part of the ionosphere. However, spiraling lights phenomenon as seen and photographed over northern Norway yesterday has not been reported at ionospheric research sites. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedI think the Norway Spiral being was actually an experiment called "tequila sunrise" This is a direct-link from the EISCAT(HAARP type facility) official website. http://www.eiscat.se/raw/schedule/comment.cgi?fileName=200912099145&Start=0700&End=1000 TEQUILAsunrise (Transient Effects Quantification Under Ionospheric Low Angle sunrise). The idea is to look at the polar wintertime mesophere through the transientcaused by (scattered) sunrise around 8 UT. Interestingly, this happens tobe the maximum occurence time of the Polar Mesosphere Winter Echoes (PMWE). VHF: TEQUILA 2009 12 09 0700 - 2009 12 09 1000 Scheduled for 0700-1000 Notice the VHF time schedule for the experiment is exactly the same time as that the Norway spiral incident occurred. You should also find this link interesting in regards to the same experiment. http://wwwppd.nrl.navy.mil/whatsnew/haarp/ And I am still open to the fact that this does not rule out other possibilities. And I already knew this before I posted.
  6. So lets get this right you moved the post because it contained the word maybeverse? I was simply posting that i'm working on a Youtube movie... Not actually trying to defend the old maybeverse thread here, that will be done within my movie. There are actually viable scientific arguments that can be made to defend maybeverse. But because one of my replies actually made reference to God, it was associated with my entire maybeverse speculation thread and that thread got closed. So I lost my opportunity to present my understandings to to this forum. Lets take this thread for example, i'm not saying anything religious whatsoever. But the word God appears thrice? Will that cause this thread to get closed? So, what is the format for making a reference to God? I am not someone who does not come prepared to make viable scientific arguments for statements that I make. So if someone says something and i'm unable to reply, they are truly loosing an opportunity to learn... That's the truth brother! Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedI had a thread in speculation closed to be redirected here... (Maybeverse movie, was in general topic area. Because it was Just an announcement...) Because the other thread was closed, i'll refocus this topic to where you wanted it... This thread topic now becomes: truedeity on black holes lol... we don't even know what kind of fire the sun is made of. come on guys... geeze. Once anything cross the static layer it's no longer matter. Black holes pierce space time (don't forget the negative electron universe here). The frequency of matter changes as its mass increases while approaching the black hole at the speed of light. In the Einstein classical variation this is impossible, but if you assume Maxwels position where the fHz changes as you get closer to light speed the state of matter changes in frequency. So the energy required to sustain your speed may in fact be less! But that's before you cross the static layer, because the interior of the black hole is a completely different fabric of space and time. That static layer serves as a separation between the 7th dimension, and to and from other possible multiverses. We cannot grasp the 7the dimension. So to suggest that matter would still be in a form that can have properties such as density, color... It's ridiculous. Et. al, As I said in the video, think of atoms/mater as it were a ball of twine en route through a black hole... that twine get unraveled. Even the very fine threads of the twine, the sub atomic pieces of the atom become apart. At this point the essence of matter is no longer a physical aspect. Density has noting to do with a black hole. I think the death ray is actually the fusing of matter back together as matter has left a parallel instance universe and must be reconstructed because of entanglement.
  7. Hope this helps. http://truedeity.wordpress.com/2009/12/20/a-place-for-consciousness-in-nature-perspective-on-%E2%80%98conscious-events-as-orchestrated-space-time-selections%E2%80%99/
  8. There are many breeds of what you might call creationists. You cant exactly categorize everybody at once without knowing intimately what their belief is on that topic. I say, that if the God most creationists worship is real. Then he is a SOB! What kind of 'loving' creator would allow for torture, rape, genocide, etc.. etc.. My long tale of the creator/intellectual design concept is as follows... The big bang happened. There were infinite possible universes all existing simultaneously. We are existing in one possible scenario instance universe. In another universe we don't exist. In-fact, there is no milky way.... But that's just 1 of infinite possibilities. Somehow, consciousness becomes a property of the universe. And I believe one day science will proove this. Stuart Hammeroff is closer to proving this than anyone else that I know. http://truedeity.wordpress.com/2009/12/20/a-place-for-consciousness-in-nature-perspective-on-%E2%80%98conscious-events-as-orchestrated-space-time-selections%E2%80%99/ Over eons and eons of human belief, the cosmos started "Godding" somehow... Sort of like how thoughts create your reality type of thing.... And I believe we can speak scientifically about God in that aspect... Because now it's not about trying to disprove evolution. It's not about creationism. It's about science... Not God. And Not Religion.
  9. There's actually software that should give you a good understanding. I think its called something like "my brain" or something... You can find the Dijkstra's algorithm in software platforms that implement Neural Maps/Neural Networks. Many routers functions also go by the Dijkstra's algorithm as well. A Dijkstra's algorithm does not necessarily need to be used as an ordered array because its purpose is to illustrate the shortest relationships between nodes. Creating an ordered array of Nodes may only be useful in a recursive searching algorithms for finding a specific category, within a complex node tree. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts merged**Edit**A Dijkstra's algorithm does not necessarily need to be used as an ordered array because its purpose is to illustrate the shortest relationships between nodes. Because that could disturb the node(s) relationships...
  10. using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using System.Xml.Linq; namespace LiquidFrameworks.GoogleMaps { public class Route { public string To { get; set; } public string From { get; set; } } public class GoogleMaps : IEnumerable<string> { Route Agenda = new Route(); public GoogleMaps(string to, string from) { Agenda.To = to; Agenda.From = from; } public List<string> GetDirections(Route Agenda) { string mapsURL = @"http://maps.google.com/?q=From " + Agenda.To + " To " + Agenda.From + "&output=kml"; XDocument mapsDocument = XDocument.Load(mapsURL); XNamespace myNS = XNamespace.Get(@"http://earth.google.com/kml/2.0"); var result = from e in mapsDocument.Element(myNS + "kml").Element(myNS + "Document").Elements(myNS + "Placemark").Elements(myNS + "name") select (string)e; return result.ToList(); } #region IEnumerable<string> Members public IEnumerator<string> GetEnumerator() { foreach (string i in GetDirections(Agenda)) { yield return i; } } #endregion #region IEnumerable Members System.Collections.IEnumerator System.Collections.IEnumerable.GetEnumerator() { return GetEnumerator(); } #endregion } } Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedI created this object so that other people can reuse google maps without calling special API.
  11. We'll I heard that the Russians denied it. What I thought strange was the heat signature of the inferred images were way outside of the range of any missile. And the Norwegian website depicts 18 layers in the spiral... Quite a display... Also there was reported a gravity spike equivalent to 20 bowing 747's. I actually heard that commented on a radio but would have to find some sources so I'm not stating that is the case... At any rate I would say its just unexplainable. And If it were a missile then its a very unique/one in a million/ display where a missile spinning out of control could look like that! I would still say unlikely to be something we can 100% agree on. However, I did write an article about this here. http://whoarethegreys.com/ufo-strange-blue-lights-seen-over-norway.html Conspiracy theorists have suggested that it's a HARRP experiment because of the blue jet leading back to the Russian HAARP facility. It could possibly be a political stunt on the part of the Russians in that Obama was in town. By this display they could be trying to suggest some intelligence. Which is very classical of Russian/Political Theme. I can tell you that the world govts. are very far advanced in science/technology now. We are at least 15 years behind the govt. They have jets right now that fly around completely invisible. So to say we know for sure what this is, is just a display of arrogance.
  12. Our conscious vehicles (Our Body) are constantly and continually pulsing waves of thought, waves of energy, interacting as a Magnetic field of energy. Our body’s are electromagnetic vehicles. We are made of atoms, particles, electrons, protons, neurons, etc… In quantum physics there is a lot of mysterious science study. How does physics work at the atomic level? This is the question scientists have been working out for years. We know now that the universe isn’t really actually made of substances. It is all potential, and it is all energy. When we look in though an atom, to its subatomic components we find NOTHING! We only know the negative electron is there, however, its fixed position can never be established. All matter is, Energy. Now, considering that the universe is made of these things, “Atoms” we must be made of them too… Which is a simple point, we all learned this in 8th grade. But keep in mind for later that there is no substance; there is only, potential, and energy. Our electromagnetic (bio-electromagnetic if you want to get technical) bodies require an energy field to sustain itself for all of its vital living functionalities. Present during neurogenesis, present during the chemical messaging from neuron to synaptic cleft, it’s the primary sparkplug of our life force motor. All that it is, and every will be, is energy…. Biological Electromagnetic Energy… Last year I was conducting an experiment on myself; in order to track and process other research. Most my research was purposed to prove why we can only remember shades of our dreams, or vivid dreams, or no dreams, and or even dreaming while we are awake (Like sleep walking… But not quite…) Part of my experiment also proves that the longer it takes for our Brain to switch from Alpha, to Theta brain wave frequencies the better the opportunity to remember and process our dream states under during the Theta (conscious) brain activity switching from Alpha dream states… Hence, the downloading of information from the sub-conscious, state systems to our conscious state system! During my researching I had more premonitions which is to become our topic… Our bodies radiate energy waves of thought, on not only one, but several frequencies. A presumable five actually… I have conducted some experiments within my means, but lack the liquidity, and resources, to take this research to the next step; for publication. Serious initiation with finances would be required for me to make that leap. I am asking for anyone’s help, in any way possible, for the next important matters to be consummated. We use electromagnetic devices every day, eg. microwaves for example in- fact, most new technology has a dependency on electromagnetism. Our bio-molecular vehicles have sensory organs designed to process the reality we exist in. Such as visible spectra, that is really part of the electromagnetic spectra. Our electro magnetic biological vehicles (body’s – ha, we should actually call them embv’s.) only use sensory adaptation to interpret variant types of electromagnetic spectra and or frequency! Now. As your existing in this state of consciousness, you’re having thoughts. Your very specific thoughts ripple though your body’s invisible bio-electromagnetic energy field and broadcast infinitely though the entire electromagnetic universe on these varying frequencies. We use EEG to study the measure of thought frequency as it pertains to waking consciousness and sleeping unconsciousness/sub-consciousness. Delta waves operate at the lowest hertz; (1-4 Hz) it is therefore the most unconscious state. The frequency of your thoughts in this state would be a different frequency than Theta, Alpha, or Beta. Respectively, this rule applies. Thoughts produce a current that affect the ELF around our body. Technology in the future will allow us to record these complex wave patterns and process the detailed data for each thought. Given time the advent of computer engineering, human engineering, ingenuity and the inspiration of science we will be able to accomplish this task. Already, we have engineered software to produce what we call Spatiotemporal Isoserfaces (http://truedeity.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/spatiotemporal-isosurfaces-of-physioinformatic-data-eeg-emg-eog-jeff-sale/). Gives us an idea of what thoughts would look like, as an electromagnetic pattern. BETA When we are active, our minds function at the beta level which is measured as being in a range of 20-14 cycles per second or 14-20 Hz. ALPHA When we begin to relax and focus our thinking, we enter more of an alpha state of 8-13 Hz. Alpha contributes to such things as meditation, hypnosis, REM sleep, dreaming, day dreams ect. THETA This is a deeper level of brain wave activity 5 – 7 Hz. Deep sleep, deep hypnosis and lack of waking consciousness is common in theta brain wave patterns. DELTA The deepest of the brain wave frequencies. 1-4Hz. No evidence of waking consciousness, deep sleep, drug induced sleep with anesthetics. (Lesser Established) MU GAMA … “According to the worlds leading neuroscientist there is a set frequency of conscious/subconscious wavelength(s).” Imagine for a moment that thoughts are their own electromagnetic fields, that can pass though any other conducting field, though space and time in a linear manner. If you accept precognition there are points when thoughts vibrate at the cellular molecular level that our consciousness slips off of the space-time continuum stream. When our brains operate on Theta and Detla waves (aka Sleep.) we actually exceed the physical dynamic of space and time. Entering “Singularity” (finally coning the phrase…) as a non-linear, non-physical version of our expanding universe. In part my experiment was attempting to disturb my consciousness (Theta) with Delta or Alpha waves. I predicted that the effect would be indescribable. That I would have a feeling of being here, and everywhere… I did, however, feel very strongly that it would have an overloading effect on my conscious state. Here is where it gets confusing. If it can be true that all of space, and all of time, is nothing more than organized systems of electromagnetic patterns, it seems more probable that thought is in fact multi-dimensional, that can and will create time and space as a product of consciousness. It is self evident, that human consciousness creates the mental reality of which our consciousness exists. Our mind processes data collected through our five senses to create tactile visual aspects of reality. The illusion of time moving forward, is yet another example; in reality it’s much different. This might be confusing but if this theory is were true it means that light is really the measurement our mind uses for perception of space and time. This is why quantum physics is unable to determine if light is a particle or a wave. And also describes why we cannot locate a particle, electron, and why Atoms are understood to be like empty forces of energy potential. If our consciousness begins to increase in frequency, to such a level that it begins to exceed even the rhythms of light waves, which our mind is accustomed to measuring time, psychological time would speed up, and physical time would slow down. This kind of effect is common during sleep, and also common during a drug induced state from hallucinogenic drugs such as LSD, Psilocybin, and Mescaline etc. ( J Ballin… ) your brain begins to turn off its cognitive wave frequencies pasterns while under a CONSCOUS state actually process and perceptually Alpha and Delta wave forms of our reality. [An extension to this thesis is coming] It will illustrate: * An individual perceptual reality skills, synesthesia, etc… * The universes consciousness… * A possible way to transcending space and time, AKA. Harnessing our mental ability to consciously linkup to any place within the singularity. The by consciously interacting with delta reality, and finding a vehicle that we can latch onto. (Possible other compatible human, and or past, and or future instances of oneself.) * Realistic explanations of the nature of all things that exist within our preperceptualized realities(s)… We have to look at Precognitive Dreams for the answers. Dreams any way we look at them are expressively a language much like our own inner dialogue we have with ourselves when we think about things in our Beta state. They are constructed by a system of highly organized thought and planning. Evidently, the deeper we go into our consciousness, the more organized and creative our consciousness becomes. Precognitive dreams are part of this Creative Process. And what is the Creative Process? It is exactly what it reads, a process of creating. What does it create? This reality… Now we get into a the part of how thinking at this super-dream level can start to effect reality in a physical sense. Hyper-thought that exists outside time/space is quite powerful. We can in an instant create and destroy a universe of our own design. Space and Time at this level is created by our understanding of how to generate a synthetic reality at a super-subconscious level. All the laws which govern the non-physical pocket reality of a dream are totally belief dependant. That is, the dream reacts to what we believe the laws of that dream’s physics should be. Most of the time, these dreams are self-contained by our sub-conscious in a highly organized and efficient manner. Our waking consciousness has a difficult time accessing this information, and understanding that it is even there in the first place.
  13. The Maybeverse Movie, Written and directed by Trudeity, Coming soon on YouTube in 2010. Here is the Trailer. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERbNAkw6bUE You can also type Maybeverse into science forums search.
  14. speech download. http://liquidresults.com/reality1.wav
  15. The main claim in this video is that the observer is not us. That there is something else more exotic that describes what the observer really is. I created this video for another website. But I decided to reuse it on this forum. It seems more redundant to have a section for quantum physics, and a section for speculation. I thought they were the same thing... Haha, anyway i'll stop with the sarcasm. What if the universe is alive? Conscious that is... It's not really a taboo topic. Because the worlds leading quantum physicists talk about this amongst their constituents. The implications of this can really only be expressed by those who are deep in understanding such anomalies as the measurement problem.
  16. lol... we don't even know what kind of fire the sun is made of. come on guys... geeze. Once anything cross the static layer it's no longer matter. Black holes pierce space time (don't forget the negative electron universe here). The frequency of matter changes as its mass increases while approaching the black hole at the speed of light. In the Einstein classical variation this is impossible, but if you assume Maxwels position where the fHz changes as you get closer to light speed the state of matter changes in frequency. So the energy required to sustain your speed may in fact be less! But that's before you cross the static layer, because the interior of the black hole is a completely different fabric of space and time. That static layer serves as a separation between the 7th dimension, and to and from other possible multiverses. We cannot grasp the 7the dimension. So to suggest that matter would still be in a form that can have properties such as density, color... It's ridiculous. Et. al, As I said in the video, think of atoms/mater as it were a ball of twine en route through a black hole... that twine get unraveled. Even the very fine threads of the twine, the sub atomic pieces of the atom become apart. At this point the essence of matter is no longer a physical aspect. Density has noting to do with a black hole. I think the death ray is actually the fusing of matter back together as matter has left a parallel instance universe and must be reconstructed because of entanglement.
  17. because it answers the question of the thread.
  18. What is the observer really? I don't believe the observer is us. Is time linear? No. More information on my video I address a lot of interesting topics here on this. http://whoarethegreys.com/Untitled.wmv
  19. I address a lot of interesting topics here on this video. http://whoarethegreys.com/Untitled.wmv
  20. Here is my answer on this. http://whoarethegreys.com/Untitled.wmv
  21. We believe that there is another mirroring universe; our positive electron universe is entirely entangled with an opposite negative electron universe. Which is congruent with the established multiverse theories. Consider the static layer of a Black Hole, it is believed to be known as a barrier which separates from the 7th dimension, and is apart of the woven fabric that ties our universe to other misc. instances.
  22. Nothing said is redundant here, just a different age of knowledge. For every sub atomic fracture a new universe of possibilities is created. Which literally means every second there are billions of possibilities as stated above. What I am implying, is that only those possibilities that are observable exist. All other possibilities do exist, but fade out of existence as the electron leaves that parallel universe instance and into a new instance. Since time is an aspect of the 7th dimension (and gravity), we are only able to comprehend a single aspect of it. All of these possibilities exist for us, but which of these possibilities will we observe? This is a time of great importance, and we need to not observe ourselves out of existence because there is a threshold. I have known about this, oh,,, roughly 8 years now... I cant even explain how I know certain things. Sometimes, when you think, you think, its not just you................... There's more of a shared thing happening here... .... I'd love to illustrate aspects of something that's ineffable..... But it can only be experienced.... .... You might be surprised that even you, can figure this out... .... The more you try to get detailed about whats really happening behind the curtains, the more you get locked into impossibility. Although, this is not the only thing, I feel we should have caught up long ago.... It's less Left, and more Right.... If you get my drift... You get to a point where you have to look inward for the best answers....... Observation, is actually an aspect of consciousness, for the universe as a living organism. Yes, I said the universe is a living organism... -,- well, It is... Think about this, the most elaborate creation in the universe is the human brain. Do you think its just a coincidence? The universe didn't just start out with that advancement. It merely observed all of its possibilities along the way... The question is, what is our role? And what's next? And why is the universe hiding its singularity? I believe the universe is trying to evolve in order to save its own life. As the photonphere is seeping outside of the static layers... (That means its dieing.) So it stimulates billions of observational possibilities, until it reaches its threshold. Now that we are aware of that, its death is nearing. Because we are limiting its options by having comprehension of this concept. A thought is made of sound, frequency, energy, and vibration. If you ask yourself what atoms are made of, you would have to agree that they are made of the same thing thoughts are made of. And everything else for that matter. Only difference is that we have a bio-electromagnetic field around our body, and our thoughts ripple though that field and though other conducting fields in the universe. But its not "in-delay" as you would think. The universe is knowledgeable of itself fully... I hold nothing against agnostic people, as I used to be somewhat agnostic when I was younger. Until I started grasping these concepts and meditating about them for years. Let's that God as we "Believe" him to exist, and observe that he exists with belief, we taunt his essence into existence. I think that the universe is more less "Godding" in some since. If you consider some of the Biblical passages, it might seem creepy how perfectly this lines up. Ask yourself this question, "if god was an all loving creator, why would he allow genocide to exist?" What if the answer to that is a bit more complicated than most fundamental Christians try to tackle and wrap into "he gave us free choice"... What if the answer is a paradox. What if God doesn't exist Yet... What if he exists in the future? What if he is cultivated as a consciousness with our thoughts, and the universe becomes that essence. Because time is a concept of the 7th dimension it means that it had already occurred, however, the sequence of events that designed his existence allowed for the universe to exist via. observational omnipresent function. I wager that evolution does exist, as a co-operative force that helps the universe survive for itself and inadvertently creates the loving concept of god with 6000+ years of human belief in God. Thus evolution does exist, just not in the same aspect that most categorize it with. So we are helping the self awareness of the universe in a particular since. "God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them." ---- seemly, the passage is more than just God created man in his image... its also,.... ---- god created man in his image. in that image god created him... male and female he created them.--- think ... look it up. Elohim................ ------------------- also consider, I am the alpha and the omega, the being, and the end. Nothing in the bible suggest that God was not created in the future and presently here since the beginning... Watching, waiting for the opportunity to step in so that he can do his work.. but he has to wait, so that he can exist first.... As we mature, and observe, we harness more and more of these reality implication's from a comprehensible point of view. This is observation that can be tested, with implication that can be expected... The time is now for people to wake up. I could debate this, but would waste way to much time. If you want to know how deep this rabit hole really is: Email Me: [==removed==] I've exposed this knowledge to many, and my understanding of it, is coherent not just abstract, we all have a synchronous way of growing intelligently. Let's make use of it. I'd rather join our egos, not destroy them...
  23. pk= primary key, fk=foreign key. best approach is to use a cross reference table. tblModuleCodes --------------- ID, *pk, Autonumber. ModuleCodeName, text. tblModuleCodeItems -------------------- ID *pk, Autonumber. ModuleCodeItemName, text. tblCrossRefModCodes -------------------- ID *pk Autonumber ModuleCodeID, numeric, *FK ModuleCodeItemsID, numeric, *FK. then simply write a sql, use the cross reference table to query/populate/append to, a table that you need. also, more scaleable, and saves space...
  24. we are not the observer.
  25. status?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.