Iwonderaboutthings

"Numerology" what is the big deal??? I hear many scientist have issues with this, so then " why use numbers at all'? To do so would that make you a hypocrite? From algebra, trigonometry and many other styles of math including Chinese, don't these stem from ancient times and cultures whom included more " spirit " in their science than expensive test that have caused more damage to the earth than positive results?? Surly scientist cannot believe that their is no "true" secrecy in numbers, otherwise why would they have been used for sooooooooo long until now??? Oh see, no real evidence for their use right? So why then link them to units and fundamental constants?? There is YOUR PROOF RIGHT??? Oh I forgot time exist in a another dimension " UNSEEN" Then as per the protocols of science time as we know it to be ' DOES NOT EXIST" So then since numerology does not exist, nor time then what is the point of life and science???

Maybe I should have stated that h = 1 as c = 1, and how time = 60*60 = 1 Its what connects the physical constants to the number 1 that I do not understand and how these get added together. SORRY FOR THE BOLD TYPE BUT I WANTED TO MAKE SURE " OTHERS" KNOW WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT. I 100% agree with you! but isn't 2 a number used as a squared multiple of 1? The whole issue is how QM and Physical Formulas ' connect ' with each-other leaving debates on what is =1 and how time to be located in another dimension and etc, I mean the list goes on and on, and for every symbol their is an entire book to read! Seriously! you get lost because their are soooooooooo many interpretations, I don't know how scientist do it really. So yes addition " is " addition.. what I mean is that you speak of exponents as 1s, and what I see are indistinguishable particles that represent 1, then I see time being in another dimension " mass-less" that " some how" becomes the denominator in derivatives.. Then units IE, meters, au, microns, inches, miles and etc are connected to these 1s added,subtracted, multiplied and etc and etc. How so? because h is also a "digital" and granular form of 1s and 0s. My OP talks about adding a number to an exponent. What if 2x + dx/ dx had an exponents in x, but the other dx had no exponent? Mind you I did not invent this stuff, its what I hear, read, and study. The h constant represents the quanta, time is the speed of light coupled with 1 sec / meters. These somehow get mixed with Pi ratio, and G fundamental constants. No one can say these are not related and or not connected to numbers because numbers represent these, otherwise c would not be perceived as 299.792.458 m/s There is something completely wrong with all of this and I am now totally convinced... This does not make sense because it is set up not to. Sadly the excuse is Numerology and or some other type of PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE STATEMENT, that diverges the answer of the question. These somehow don't seem like science debates rather excuses these days, ' FROM SOME' I have been told many times by physicist that at times one should accept that they may be wrong about everything they have grasped to understand about the mysterious forces of nature, I don't see how looking at things in a dogmatic sense can unravel billions and billions of years in natural creation and phenomena that is beyond human comprehension..Its pathetic and sickening, especially when " politics " plays the upper role model on what we learn in school and how to apply this to the laws of nature.. HOW FUNNY! The ranting is because I will not tolerate PASSIVE BEHAVIOR NOR SPECULATIONS. UNLESS I START A THREAD IN THAT AREA. Universal law of attraction " you get what you give."

Sorry I don't think that "PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE STATEMENTS" such as the kind imatfaal is considered " your daily normal reply" Can you post your " concerns" on the post that you are confused on please? therefore " We" can keep things neat and organized. On another note, Learning Math has many styles and forms not just one " Dogmatic " point of view.. And this is based on facts, not assumptions, dogmas nor speculations.. Since this is the case, there is, shall and will always remain doubts in any field of Mathematics.. However, thanks for your recommendations, I have seen the link millions of times, but there is " no one" whom has defined the real meaning behind what 1 truly stands for... imatfaal ' DID NOT GIVE A GOOD Answer" their reply suggest a passive aggressive speculations. Anyway: Your reply WINS #1 IN MY BOOK! Then technically WE LIVE ON THE NOTION THAT EVERYTHING IS 1 THEN RIGHT?? 134 = 1 134 is not equal to 1*34, it is 1*1*1*1... (34 multiplications). Use a calculator to calculate 12, 15 and 110. Is this in a digital sense " h " "light and illusion" or a scientific physical sense " gravity and matter" ?

Thanks, no one ever says this here, this has really helped answer my questions as to why equations need to balance, it seems that nature always will have the last word..

THIS IS MY NOTE FOR THE SAKE OF ANYONE READING THIS TREAD: I HAVE FULL RESPECT FOR ALL TYPES AND STYLES OF MATH. imatfaal The only possible reason would be numerology which is bunkum?? WOULD YOUR GUESS DEFINE YOU AS HAVING SUPERNATURAL PHYSIC ABILITIES? which is bunkum. "is" your opinion, and none of my concern. My Op is about adding exponents and smaller numbers otherwise I would have placed it in "speculations." Perhaps I should have stated this another way. if 9.98857^34 is multiplied by itself 34 times, then could this mean that 9.98857 = 1 so that 1*34 = 34? If so could 4.777 just be added to 34 and call it a day? This may be problematic because then 9.98857 and its exponent 34 would seem to be "CHASING" each other around with imaginary units, much like an inverse square law if and only if " someone decided to multiply this by 34 in the 1st place.... Although I understand that math is a general concept and or model for visualization, I guess the issues lay on how 1 is either set, defined and or drawn to its limit with dx " as per " how it is " manually set. " So what does 1 have to do with the OP: This: if 9.98857^34 is multiplied by itself 34 times, then could this mean that 9.98857 = 1 so that 1*34 = 34? Don't get me wrong here, there are many ways to figure this out numerology, number theory " complex numbers" just some of them, but I am here to learn the correct science preferred way and ask questions..

So what you are saying is that 6.626* 10^-34 where the base system 10 is used has no inherit meaning?? Euler is another one that uses ten base log scales here is the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_(mathematical_constant) Why do they rely on log base ten scales for accounting if there is no inherent meaning to them? Or does accounting not need apply to " real " science and real physical elements?

Oh my god I don't believe I am asking this>>> Rather how do you add a number and another number that has an exponent? That sounds more clearer. YES! I am scratchy on this, or just need to make sure... So we have, example here: 9.98857^34 + 4.777... 4.777 has no exponent. But should I take a log scale and see what the exponent for 4.777 ?? Such like this: 4.777^ 0.67915524128 here is the link I used for this: Logarithm of 4.777 Base 10 http://www.1728.org/logrithm.htm In all, I think I will always be confused on this, it just does no make any sense whatsoever.

Thanks for the reply. But what about particle indistinguishability? What about the north and south positions mentioned earlier? I think I saw that somewhere in this thread

Why is 1/2 so important in the QM world??? For instance SI units " mostly uses" bases of 10 below is an image that shows this. A good example is .5c = 149.896229, are the meters 1/2?? Then their is the case about the exponent , how does this also relate to 1/2. Energy of photon : c*h =299.792458*6.626e-34 = 1.9864e-31 c*h =299.792458*6.626e-34 = 1.9864e+31 ??? Could this be 1/2 as well??? AS IN THE BASES OF 10, SUCH LIKE 10/2 = 5? I have seen the n^(n+1) deal but how would this yield 1/2 in the exponential properties of 1/2 making this =1? This is why I assumed this for the energy of the photon: 1.9864e-31= 1 1.9864e+31= -1 I know that may be wrong! I am quite familiar with units and conversions, but this area of 1/2 and what it means is wayyyyyy confusion as per the protocols of physics and strict guidelines of SI units coupled with conversion factors. Sincerely Confused

the entangled partner??? How on earth would you know which particle out of the trillions and trillions out there???????

Yikes! that article is interesting! thanks!

Opps I forgot about those Not annoying I value you " paying attention" thanks.. In a sense yes, Hawaii and New York" would need to be the locations as they are the distances from the person's mind and thoughts per say. Think in terms of relativity and 2 observers but in this case we have " one " person up against their own thoughts and memories with no other people involved. IE, people they interacted with at these locations, IE again, waiters, taxi cab drivers, bums hookers etc>>

Can human thoughts be measured?????? If a person remembers their vacation to Hawaii " past" " while at work in New York " present" could this " technically " be termed a measure of human thoughts? Just take the distance from Hawaii And New York And violla there it is! But lets say that this same person remembers " multiple" vacation trips on this very same day at work in New York, then things get rather complex, right?? Could this be another case of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle?? To get more complex, say this person goes home after a long days work and decides to just go to bed and sleep the rest of the evening. Then they dream of this vacation in Hawaii, while asleep in New York "after work... Could this now be an invalid case all together and an impossibility? How would science define a setting as dx approaches--------> WHAT????

great article! read about 1/2 will finish the rest tomorrow thanks!

THIS MADE CRYSTAL CLEAR SENSE THANKS! ! Now many other things make more and more sense, I get inspired now.... TRULY APPRECIATED

numerically set the speed of light to be 1 ""yes"" the units and their settings.... I kind of thought this to be the case but wanted to be very very sure as to the " SETTINGS OF 1" So you don't minus 1 you minus the speed of light??????????? So as dx->0 makes more sense to me cause it would be undefined then, 1 needs to be initialized and set??????? So then REPLACE THE 1 IN THE UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE WITH C????

Fourier transforms of each other?????????????? When you say "each other" does this mean one variable is used twice? In Fourier transforms? Such that , x is used twice like " example" x = G x1 and x2, but x always has the same value G?? x= G and then again x = G of "each other" ???? On another note. In the Uncertainty Principles coupled with Lorentz Transforms Special Relativity etc, does 1 mean the physical number 1 " one" or does it mean. 1 = c 1= pi 1= x^2 ???? Here is this 1 as I am seeing it. But then we see 2 a very often number used in derivatives. What really discourages me about science is not understanding how science equations just throws a 1 in there. Truly 1 must be some type of squared unit per say. Doesn't c = 1 second as well?????????, is this what this 1 means?????????? Utterly Confused on this 1 deal.

Taken from Wikipedia. In quantum mechanics, the uncertainty principle is any of a variety of mathematical inequalities asserting a fundamental limit to the precision with which certain pairs of physical properties of a particle known as complementary variables, such as position x and momentum p, can be known simultaneously. Here is the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle --->Although I am quite familiar with the generalization, I am wondering if. That the uncertainty principle sounds like a mathematical attempt " with no physics involved" that tries to locate 2 positions simultaneously and or harmoniously, while using momentum and mass simultaneously <--- if that makes any sense. I think precession may be the issue. By this I mean such as planet earth having 2 seasons at the same time. However, could this uncertainty principle unknowingly have its " Translation Method" off by some factor of degree, due to fundamental limits of precision?

Ok thanks just wanted to make sure

Everything has an initial start at 1 thus everything expands from there. From cells, amino acids, " time" etc. 1 has to have some connection with its " origination." Otherwise 1 as a number like you said is just a number, although used is still undefined. I have seen these 1s many many times in many equations, but I gather their must be a method to distinguish them from the origination and source per say, such as h and the Deseret Amounts of energy used in the QM... However this is just a thought, but it is logical.

Great Links! thanks its makes more sense with the models. I am still confused on that " 1 " in the denominator, seems like a Lorentz Transform or something.. What does this 1 in the denominator represent? Lorentz Transform? I think it means " initial start but un-like h this can be wrong considering the discrete amounts of energy from what I know. From what I gather 1 is a factor of everything right??? When you say " factor of 2 * Pi" does this mean the number 6.28?? Wouldn't that mean that pi ratio has an anti as in +1 and 1... Pi ratio is also used to measure volume from what I know, would this be the reason why for the Compton Wavelength? Along with sin, cos, tangent the speed of light, G and h, this can be very very confusing

Is this correct to ask?? --->But doesn't spectroscopic-analysis rely on luminosity? If so then how can " light" be considered mass when light photons are mass-less? Yes I know about radiation and heat as energy and mass, but confused on the whole light deal. Is this something like black body radiation, or the Stephan Boltzmann method>? Stefan–Boltzmann constant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan%E2%80%93Boltzmann_law

Would you say that " although the units cancel that the numerical value is constant " somewhere not in the domains of space and time?? Hence 360 d, the speed of light, pi ratio etc if the radian is = to the length " which one?" secant, cosec, cosine, tangent?? x or y, or does this not apply to the unit circle? So if the units cancel out then there is no " real " method of getting the " single" radian and converting this to a single length with no curvature whats so ever?? Or would you just go back to the original length??? Its like going back and forth with converging, does not make sense at all and then the numerical values seem to get lost in all this but aren't the values just random numbers?? Could all this just be about position? Hence: units cancel