Jump to content

Iwonderaboutthings

Senior Members
  • Posts

    353
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Iwonderaboutthings

  1. What I would love to understand as per the protocols of physics is: For instant C = 2*pi, here we are left with divisions of zeros?? How can anything that travels in a straight path use such a method?? Does "radians" come in different lengths??? Meaning that are radians " straight lines" as if though beaming outward like photons?? Example x travels A to B, in a straight line with no curves whats so ever... Is x straight distance from A to B considered the radian's distance in a straight line??? I found this converter link here, but somehow the straight line question does not seem to apply. Degrees and radians http://www.mathinary.com/degrees_radians.jsp Several reasons I am confused on this is because: Translation, The Unit Circle and Pi ratio which all involve empty space??? If so then how can radians be any length not = 0? Sincerely confused
  2. This is just my opinion, pi ratio turns up everywhere how could this be related to mass at all?? If what I am seeing is correct then are you're saying that 4*pi ratio coupled with G is correlated with Plank Units?? Maybe this would make sense since you are referring to an extrapolated absolute rest mass, but wouldn't this be impossible using pi ratio?? Isn't pi ratio related to infinity? How do you contain infinity??? The theory of infinity and the laws of relativity between dimensions. http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/79093 If pi ratio is thus related to infinity then how can anything be extrapolated using empty space?? Are your sure the issue is not getting the limit of a physical reality of infinity such as in the case of pi itself? What pertains to this absolute rest mass?? The box of the particle? Particle in a box http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_in_a_box I assume e to be the electron charge. From what I know e is indistinguishable?? Is this correct?? Indistinguishable Particles and Exchange http://www2.ph.ed.ac.uk/~gja/qp/qp9.pdf To add is that an exponent of .5?? Meaning that .5*2 = 1 From what I am looking at your equation appears " in-completed." The reason for this is because if at all pi ratio is being used correctly their still is the issue of precession and perhaps this explains the h-bar, give or take pi ratio turns up everywhere, how could this be related to mass at all?? But I may be wrong, what confuses me is the 4*pi ratio and the exponent of .5 So then, mass are multiples of itself, and deductions allow calculations from the positions of the multiples? Simple Example Here: In other words, 3*7 = 21/ 2 = 10.5 Where 10.5 is the length and the position of the mass in question. 3 and 7 serve as dx and dp where dp is momentum.. Now what about the uncertainty principle?? dx = unit and location, and dp = momentum, which in tern is the product of m*v but not acceleration... SO WHAT IS DOING ALL THE MULTIPLYING????????????????
  3. sorry, what is 3-momentum p stand for?? p= mv? is a product from the two from what I understand, or is this wrong? where does constant velocity come in? To be simple, when you say " at rest" does this mean "standing still"? Also, I assume that constant velocity is measured out of this " rest " " standing still" mass. But doesn't everything vibrate with a frequency?? Meaning that I have read that atoms, molecules, air pressure, water, thoughts, heat, x rays and etc, all have a vibration to them right? I am not really sure if what I have stated is true , but I assume this would be the case. Here is a video on this: Frequency & The Law of Vibration http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEX2-m8EabU
  4. What is rest mass as per QM, and even Physics. When I think of rest mass I think of it this way.. A car is moving slowly, the engine works up energy to " pull" the driver, passengers and all things in this car forward. When the car starts speeding up to a constant velocity it is thus out of its rest mass??? The mass of the car I am assuming is stationary>>? But it seems this was true when its in constant velocity>>? I think in this way because of fermions and bosons. Fermions having mass? and photons not having mass but being related to time? I have read over the internet about rest mas, but still it makes no sense whats so ever to me.. Thanks in advance
  5. Very well said and thanks
  6. Why is the spin independent??? Doesn't QM deal with waves meaning circles?? Could this be because spin as a "completion" meaning " a completed circle as a " translation" " larger" is always still = 0 ? For example: x^2 = -1 In other words no matter how large a circle becomes with translation it shall always have the same perimeter, right? I assume this is where radians comes in for the " diameter " as a linear x method of distance, but that is just a concept for now with pi ratio coming along to the picture. The Pythagorean Theorem comes to mind as well which deals with squared units " again " in the outer perimeters.. Pythagorean Theorem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem Gravity, The Speed of Light and Pi ratio, h and the h bar are all used with this independent spin??? Hymmmm
  7. Very well stated I will look more into this thanks
  8. THIS FORUM IS INCREDIBLE WOW! I have learned sooooo much in such a short time, it is overwhelming..

  9. Why on earth is pi ratio used????????????? asymptotic expansions http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymptotic_series What defines 1 with the: Asymptotic expansion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymptotic_series Is 1 set by scientist?? Also what role does the fine structure constant " dimensionless" have in all this ? Thanks for all the replies ajb very informative stuff WHEYYY need to blow my brains off HA!
  10. Not all are scientist, everyday people think about this all the time, but their methods are not as complex nor technical I would say to ponder about something either understood or not, would perhaps reveal the " why of things" Strong Nuclear forces is an attempt to understand creation and how I see this to be, how can anyone be trusted with such unfathomable knowledge??????????????? I am so glad others know about this
  11. wouldn't that place a delay on the speed of light??? rather net force or something to that nature?? For example like interpolation I believe.. If you refer to Electro Static Equilibrium then would't this not matter?? Everything on the surface of earth would then be set at 0 gravity right?? Or am I confused on this
  12. WOW! very informative thank you very much! I read the link on the collider, very expensive to test, I hope we do find this someday! Very well understood thanks for your reply why do you say --->we would need a proper quantum description of a system of 1023 electrons in a metal, and then maybe we'd have a good theory of superconductors. Is the h constant not enough to handle this??
  13. Why do scientist ponder over Strong Nuclear Forces?? Would this help in any way shape or form in the evolution of mankind as a whole? What would this new discover do?? Perhaps maybe understanding strong nuclear forces could advanced our methods of finding cures such as cancers and other health concerns that the world can benefit from. Or maybe we could develop easier methods for precise accuracy versus averages? I think that this discovery would infact allow us to create space vessels for inter galactic travel! I think all the possibilities from this and somehow look forward for the future. But how far away are we from understanding the full potential of QM? I have always regraded the h constant as the strong nuclear force, but perhaps this is not the case.. I think that as long as QM still remains unclear, our pondering and wanting to understand strong nuclear forces is light years away, however is this the case in our modern day and age?
  14. There are many incredible people here that have awesome knowledge in so many fields that I wonder how on earth can they remember all that from school, wow! impressive.

    1. Unity+

      Unity+

      I would caution you about some cranks that may come here. Don't be deceived by them. However, yes I would agree there are many intelligent people here.

    2. Iwonderaboutthings

      Iwonderaboutthings

      Thanks for the heads up...

  15. You say -----> localized place?????? when you try to detect it??? Where???? Are these positions relative to each other in the wave pattern????????????????? If yes, how would this relate to spin 1/2 particles??? Momentum???? Angular????????? I am very familiar with the constchetens of modern day particles so this helps me understands what we are talking about. I want to know if their is a wave " an "invisible one" that the particles uses as a predefined path... You suggested this earlier this is why I am asking again.. Its a wave right?? From what I know a wave is well " a wave" it has time as in wave length.. I assume this is where torque speed and spin 1/2 particles came into the picture??? The issue for me is this wave deal.............
  16. Cup of water upside down will pour the water on the floor, but the ocean stays on earth " for example." Both examples here would not be possible without gravity and of coarse " the motion." IE, hand makes the cup tilt, earth causes people to rotate relative to the surface topology. But this does not make any sense though, how can gravity work in both situations???????????? AGAIN: Cup of water upside down will pour the water on the floor, but the ocean stays on earth " for example." Both examples here would not be possible without gravity and of coarse " the motion." If the world is rotating and one is like a tree on the ground would this be technically termed hanging upside down? If so then the mind has no rule over " the physical reality" this is not QM here. I mean the northern hemisphere of earth at some point must be at the bottom of earth's rotation so I am assuming somewhere like at night I should be feeling that I am at some type of angle, upside down right side up?? If I was walking on a basket ball I would know my movement due to my peripheral view of the basket ball, however earth is much much bigger than this... I think there is something wrong here. Its not the mind nor our visual realities its the physical evidence of gravity having an effect on our " precognition" similar to QM.... Thats not physics at all, thats metaphysics That's a good point and I read the link thanks sir But aren't the laws of nature not concerned with what humans think and or perceive?? I have been told this before and in this circumstance I think I am finally understanding much about physics and science coupled with how the mind seems not to apply to physics and the physical laws of nature. One cannot argue to see the physical fact that a cup pours water when it is tilted towards the floor, this is a physical fact that relies on gravity but oceans remain on the surface regardless of the rotation of earth...However, the moon does have effects on the ocean tides and so fourth.. So you say that G seems to have affects on the mind???????? Only on the surface??????????? 9.8 m/s is G on the earths surface right?? Would this OP only hold valid on the surface of earth???? That is strange... Same premise if one was on a hang glider. But then when thinking about this, my OP would not matter It would be then related to air pressure coupled with G on the earth's surface. Seems like G has many virtual effects on nature even the mind???
  17. I have a question, can smoking cause " stomach cramps" I think I have read this before on a health page somewhere, but I am a smoker and no doubt I have found that the older I have become it seems that these stomach cramps get worse.. I even at times have shallow breathing especially when it is cloudy. I have been checked up no signs of cancer in my lungs and my lungs are 100% in good condition. So I am confused on some things about cigarettes.. I have tried stopping at times successfully and I know the health issues cigarettes causes, but not to sure about prolonged stomach cramps. Endoscopy shows no inflammation either.. Thanks in advance..
  18. The lap top was on my "stomach" and I was laying flat on the floor with a pillow over my head in this position. Do you think that some people can be intolerant of any sort of heat??? I used to place warm pads on my stomach some time back just because it felt good, I always bath in nice hot water, I have a thing for warm things, but maybe some people's bodies can work backwards? I know for one I cannot stand the cold! BUT! I love seeing the snow, its is incredible to see..
  19. This has been one that has puzzled my mind, at first I though it was because the images in our brain are yet projected backwards, however this seems not the case??? Another time I thought perhaps this was due to the close proximity on the earth's surface along with peripheral view. Maybe even having two eyes??? Still this has me quite puzzled as amusement rides such as roller coasters can make you feel backwards. Maybe it is the force of the roller coaster that does this or the natural laws of motion in general... Nevertheless, if the space shuttle in outer space lands on the earth, how and or why do the astronauts not feel they are hanging backwards????? Thanks in advanced
  20. Can there be a way " if possible" that pi ratio in it's absolute value can be found???????? What is the process???? Everything eventually needs an upgrade when dealing with science, math and all that applies to the natural world described with the numerics of human psychology. Reasoning behind this is due to calculations being set in a backwards sense, not aimed for the future but thats one way of looking at this. Seems like a for loop if you ask me. It is because of this flaw and premise that we still in our day and age use " numbers" linked to the laws of nature that determine " some " relation and or interaction." Though highly respected to me scientist are, I feel they should be more open minded to approaches that others may encounter and be able to solve derivatives without the need for " standard calculations." Anti-Derivative of x uses 1 again as a numerator, here is a good link. http://cims.nyu.edu/~kiryl/Calculus/Section_4.7--Antiderivatives/Antiderivatives.pdf The whole issue is based on what is this one? if you ask me it is still the constant of 2 as in .5*2=1 BUT! In binaries this constant of 2 is not always the case. In computer science numbers as: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 all eventually move over as 0=1 2=3 3=4 and so fourth. They seem to be dynamic and static again there are 2 things going on with these numbers.. I want to emphasize that binary systems do not understand ratios, this is why the " floating point" was created I assume. How can that be related to physical science??????????? A quanternion method should be most suitable for this Anti-Derivative of x , in one where field axioms and other algebraic rules coupled with calculus not need apply. But that would only be an extrapolation of this sort.
  21. In order to understand the mind in all its mysteries, questions, doubts, fears and etc, you must question the very 1st interactions of where these mysteries, questions, doubts, fears and etc " came from. Doing this will allow "you" the space in your mind to understand what defines " you" and what "you" perceive as true consciousness. This will then rid you of : your 1st interactions of where these mysteries, questions, doubts, fears and etc " came from. You then enjoy " bliss" never wrong nor right just being you.
  22. nevermind it's a bad joke, it doesn't matter. But in pure philosophy I think the electron may be bi curious On one end it acts straight is in a straight line but when things heat up it bends,,, get it?? It seems to be predefined??????????? Uhh , I would really love to be able to visualize this "please" The electron is " already a wave" meaning that a "physical wave path" is there that is " really the electron?" What I am seeing is this: An invisible wave " already there" stationary " static" and then the electron " appears " out of nowhere" hops on this wave and follows this pattern?? How so through them slits??? How does this wave know where those slits are??????????
  23. Not sure if this could answer your question. But I think prolonged heat rather ingested or not around the " stomach area" in general may cause some discomfort . I am no doctor, however once I had my lap-top on my stomach while laying flat down on the floor studying and could feel the warmth of the lap-top's bottom on my "ie" stomach area. About two weeks later I started to developed very very strong stomach cramps! Very painful ones... I did not see a doctor for this, however I never did this again and never will! The cramps eventually went away. I believe also it could have been electro magnetic fields from the lap top that are also associated with heat. On another note: There are some cultures however that practice drinking warm water after meals. The reason for this is because "cold" water tends to harden oil molecules of food within the walls of the stomach and intestinal tract thus leading to cholesterol issues later in life.
  24. You are 100% correct on the The------>"meaningful calculation" But in today's "mentality" I think that perhaps we should consider that what is meaningful to some is pointless to others " hence" if its not broken don't fix it mentality.When connecting Classical Physical Formulas with QM operators we see things that don't pair up and or brake down. Even if it is a tiny tiny micro amount of discrepancy it still is an issue for a larger part of the whole. In a Digitized Binary Sense this deal of 1/2 "seems" to be incompatible with how Calculus defines derivatives. Hence again: But in today's "mentality" 2013 not the 1900s.. To add computer systems don't recognize ratios they stack floating point variables much like dx within Calculus. For those whom may not know this the h constant is the number that rules technology and was used in the making of the microprocessor. Not sure about the life thing though! Planck's Constant: The Number That Rules Technology, Reality, and Life http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/blog/2011/10/plancks-constant/ Another great link on : Number Bases: Introduction / Binary Numbers IT'S WORTH READING! http://www.purplemath.com/modules/numbbase.htm So how did I go from KE, Pi Ratio, Time And Computer Science???????? Again their all connected to energy and time. They all seem to be un-avoidable when used separately I know that sounded dumb but think about it.
  25. MMmmm I lova "uhh" good " ole" pork now and then, nice an juicy too! HA! Tell me, whats your favorite part of porking " Uhmm------>eating??" I like pork head, really! I tried this one time at a MexicaTacoria, it was scrumptious.. Me and the electron have " similar traits" grin
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.