-
Posts
771 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by nec209
-
no Medical community progress in cancer treatment in the past 10 to 15 years ?
-
Health-care injection $190M Alberta's health superboard will spend $190 million in new funding to improve emergency waiting times and speed access to cancer care and knee replacements, after new statistics show the system continues to struggle to meet some targets. Between October and December 2010, for instance, cancer patients continued to wait 6.3 weeks from their referral to their first appointment with a radiation oncologist, instead of the target of 4.9 weeks for the year end. Waits stalled from the previous quarter and actually went up from the first quarter of the year, when they sat at 5.4 weeks. Cataract patients waited 45.9 weeks to have their cataracts removed at the end of 2010, longer than the target of 37.3 weeks set for the third quarter of the health authority's fiscal year (which ends March 31). Ontario cataract patients wait 14.9 weeks. Alberta's cataract waits were the worst of 10 provinces, according to a 2009 Canadian Institute for Health Information report. Patients needing new hips waited 42.9 weeks for surgery, more than 10 weeks longer than the quarterly target of 30.3 weeks and the March 31 target of 28 weeks. Read more here http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Health+care+injection+190M/4619197/story.html
-
The health care cost is exploding in US too and more Canadians make trips to see a doctor and check ups do to free health care than the US. And there are some crappy insurance companies that do not want to cover you health care cost so people do not go see doctor to the problem is too late and you get more medical problems and cost more. The reason health care cost is exploding in US and Canada is mostly 4 reason . 1. aging population 2. the inventions of CT scan and MRI that was not there before. 3. Doctors and staff over pay . 4. CEO`s and board of directors that make $1,000,000 a year. The reason countries like USSR and Cuba can have such high number of Doctors and staff per population is simple . 1.They did not have alot of the CT scan and MRI 2.no CEO`s and board of directors has it all run by communist party 3.Doctors and staff got little pay Has for other countries like South America ,Asia ,Africa and Central America their health care when comes technology,care and treatment is 50 years or more behind the US . And the doctors and staff get little pay.
-
So what are you saying the Medical community progress in cancer treatment in the past 10 to 15 years is not that great?
-
Health-care spending is expected to shoot upward over the next 20 years, forcing Canadians to make big sacrifices to cure the ill effects of this "spending disease," according to a report released Wednesday by the C.D. Howe Institute. Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/health/Report+warns+health+care+spending+disease/4572530/story.html#ixzz1Irf64bfo ====== What is your though on this? The health care is on life support now with long delays in ER and shortage of doctors and staff.
-
I'm sorry what do you mean? Are you saying the money going to cancer treatment is fake ? saying little to no Medical community progress in cancer treatment in the past 10 to 15 years?
-
These stats do not seem right http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/prod_consump/groups/cr_common/@nre/@sta/documents/image/crukmig_1000img-12646.jpg And here are five year survival rates some more survival statistics, also from the UK. http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/survival/latestrates/ All sites 66% +++++ ???? Breast 89% ++++++ 79% Colon 65% ++++++ 46% Leukemia 50% ++++++ 38% Lung cancers 16% ++++++ 6% Melanoma 92% Non-Hodgkin lymphoma ++++++ 84% Ovary45% ++++++ Pancreas 5% ++++++ 3% Prostate 99% ++++++ 61% Rectum 66% ++++++ 45% Urinary bladder 81% ++++++ ??? stomach ++++++ 13% Oesophagus ++++++ 7% Brain ++++++ 13% Cervix ++++++ 68% Kidney ++++++ 45% multiple myeloma ++++++ 24% Larynx ++++++ 61% Bladder ++++++ 71% Colon ++++++ 46% I thought most types of cancer have a 50% survivor rate ?? The one in bold are from the new stats site that seem much lower than the other stats I posted. The Medical community progress in cancer treatment in the past 10 to 15 years is much higher than stats poste here.
-
Cancer and autoimmune disease was not a problem 100 years ago has most people would not live to 40`s and using evolution or god way there was no old people or nursery homes has people would be dead way before they got old. All modern medicine is doing is keeping us on life support system but are body clock is saying we should be dead.Put it other way evolution or god what ever you want to call it people body was not built to live past age 40 and surely not to age 60's. Well obesity ,diabetes and being fat is do to the modern world we live in.Well for infectious disease that do to people that go to ER for every time they get sick and those people should be locked in jail for doing this. And also stong and tough people are breeding with weak people this does not help too.
-
Other one of those things that stress can cause thin hair , little hair ,lack hair or baldness. Next it be smoking or drinking = thin hair , little hair ,lack hair or baldness than next smoking pot or not exercising. What joke science has become today and most people will pay millions of dollars for drug = lots of hair. Well humans have way more health problems than any other living thing do to modern healthcare took evolution out of the picture.The week and sick die and stong and tough live and we evolve to over come cancer ,autoimmune disease and other health problems . Some other living things live way longer than people. Look at modern world full health problems people in 20`s or 30`s have so much health problems now it sick.
-
Okay this makes me so bad today. I think the media has all turn into little grade 7 kids that know nothing of science. 1.That look at US space program most people think we can live on the moon or mars this is just a joke. 2.Most people think we can do space mining or space colony again what a joke 3.Most people think we can go to mars in 5 or 10 years from now again what a joke 4.Most people think we can have moon base or base on mars in 10 to 15 years again what a joke Now that look at other science . 1.Most cancers out there there is cure what a joke !!!! 2.Most autoimmune diseases we can treat the problem again what a joke 3.Most trips to ER we can treat or cure it what a joke . It is more 1 in 3 in ER we can treat or cure . What is wrong with people today and the media.
-
There are 300 types of cancer and the vast majority have a 50% five year survival rate and the non majority are from one spectrum to 80% higher to other spectrum of only 10% or 5%. The cancer of lung , pancreatic , stomach ,prostate cancer are 99% a death disease. I think the media has clouded your brain we live in high tech world where most trips to ER there is cure this just wrong.In fact modern medicine has no idea what do with cancer and autoimmune disease. The modern medicine may understand alot now how the human body works but don't have any idea how fix it .This is problem with media that shows we live in a high tech world so we think modern medicine should be like that.This is just wrong.
-
Well there has been no cancer progress in lung cancer, pancreatic cancer , stomach cancer ,prostate cancer and cholangiocarcinoma cancer in the past 5 to 10 years You tell my looking at the stats. ere are the five year survival data from the ACS 2008 All sites 66% Breast 89% Colon 65% Leukemia 50% Lung cancers 16% Melanoma 92% Non-Hodgkin lymphoma64% Ovary45% Pancreas 5% Prostate 99% Rectum 66% Urinary bladder 81% stomach cholangiocarcinoma So yes you are right there has been little to no cancer progress .
-
For some reason the US has very high case of infant death in the ER.
-
How Biotech may help people live longer in the future
nec209 replied to nec209's topic in Medical Science
Hay all there are some really good video on this at youtube and I know the learning channel like discovory talks about this. What do you think. -
EDMONTON — A University of Alberta astronomer and his team have uncovered “weird” physics inside a neutron star in the Milky Way Galaxy. Craig Heinke and his colleagues have discovered the core of the Cassiopeia A neutron star — the remains of a supernova — contains a frictionless superfluid that seems to defy gravity, as well as a superconductor that keeps electricity flowing without ever losing energy. Scientists had long suggested this “weird state of matter” might exist inside the cores of neutron stars, but there had been no direct evidence of it before, Heinke said Sunday. Read more: http://www.edmontonjournal.com/technology/Weird+physics+found+frictionless+fluid+inside+neutron+stars/4356331/story.html#ixzz1FKPrdYCj
-
A researcher with the name of Dr. Million Mulugeta might have found a way to make a million or much more. It's very early yet but Dr. Mulugeta of UCLA reports that while conducting a study on stress he and his research team managed to find a cure for baldness in mice. They released their findings in February of 2011. Dr. Mulugeta says the compound they used on the mice was not intended to do anything at all for hair loss, or rather fur loss, but for stress. The mice had experienced their hair/fur loss while being genetically altered to produce extra stress hormones for the purposes of the research. Read more at Suite101: Feb. 2011 Study: Hair Loss in Mice Reversed, Human Tests Next http://www.suite101.com/content/feb-2011-study-hair-loss-in-mice-reversed-human-tests-next-a353659#ixzz1FKOsM9x6 ===================================================================== ===================================================================== ===================================================================== Wow what does this mean for people that have little to no hair?
-
I thought Scheerer's phenomenon was is the appearance of tiny bright dots moving quickly along when looking into blue light or very bright out side? And visual snow is like snow like appearance does not matter if it is bright or not.There is no cure for Scheerer's phenomenon and visual snow yet . The dots are due to the white blood cells that move in the capillaries in front of the retina from what I understand. my last question I thought digestive tract was 5 to 8 hours ? For past 3 days I got a upset stomach 2 hours after eating the same food. I thought 2 or 3 hours the food would not even be in the small intestine yet that lone the bigger intestine ?
-
How Biotech may help people live longer in the future
nec209 replied to nec209's topic in Medical Science
No I was saying that link what does aging and living longer have to do with cancer? okay this what I wanted to know. Why evolution of people they are getting bigger ,taller and bigger heads over time? Yes if the public know about cancer ,diabetes , obesity ,skyrocketing increase in renal failure not to say now autoimmune diseases the government will declare the state of emergency.Look at that video above saying every 30 seconds some one is dying of cancer in the US. sorry what do you mean? humans have bigger brains now and taller and much bigger. Well bigger animals live longer than small animals or rodents.The bigger the mass the longer you live that is basic evolution. -
Like the other poster here say it not going happen it is scfi. I have done some reading and writting my own report on this . This was I wrote to other message boards.It sad but this is reality you would get nobel prize in physics if you even come up with theory on hard to bring the space cost down than alone test and build it !!! In other words no one has theory that alone of putting theory on black board in to the real world of testing and building it. It has come up here and on other message boards on warp drive ,space mining ,space colony and starships .Also on TV show Sci Fi Science: Physics of the Impossible and the book physics of the impossible by Michio Kaku . Here is what I wrote . Yes I'm fan fan of the TV show Sci Fi Science: Physics of the Impossible and the book physics of the impossible by Michio Kaku !! I think there was some bad flaws on his part has it is premature to talk about starship ,warp-drive ,space mining and space colony to the number one problem is to bring the space cost down to open up acess to space. Has of now only 3 countries can go in space no more than 5 times a year that cost money like a leaky faucet .Not to say lobbyist hard at work to do away of man space-flight and go with space probes. The reason the space program has not done much in past 50 years is cost .And space mining or 5% or 10% of the people on earth going into space is prohibited expensive. The number one problem is to bring the space cost down to open up acess to space. Than we can work on harder stuff like starship ,warp-drive ,space mining and space colony that is much harder and will take longer.Why because as of now not even less than 1% of people will have money to go into space and lobbyist hard at work.When the space cost goes down more countries can be putting people into space every week or more than every two months. I feel he did not say much about the space program and discusess enough about the propulsion system. It is to bad but Ion propulsion or plasma propulsion does not have enough thrust to lift any thing from earth.And laser propulsion and microwave propulsion cannot work in space has it is energy and not mass .Not to say it needs gigawatt power and that much power the craft would be power station and inpossible to make floating power station.Well fusion propulsion no point talking about that to we get working fusion .And anti-matter way too costly and cannot be stored or used as a fuel .It take long time if it is even inpossible to make anti-matter cheap and find out a way to store it and use it has a fuel. And fission propulsion may work but people fear fission .In the end we only have chemical propulsion to get in space and it is coming to brick wall with being more fuel efficient and lower cost .In the future when the engineering problems are solved if they are solved than may be they can look into ant-matter and fusion propulsion . Other than that it is hope fringe propulsion one of them to out to be real like negetive energy or negetive matter and no one has made it or seen it in world , so may be one day we may make it !! Now levitation or anti-gravity no one has made it or seen this in world so may be it is real but no one has discovered it yet.And megnetic propulsion well we do not know how to make a monopole. If not and we find no other propulsion than space mining ,space colony ,warp drive and star ship is very much going to be scfi. ============== To bad but in end we are long long long long long way away of warp drive ,space mining ,space colony and starships if impossible .
-
How Biotech may help people live longer in the future
nec209 replied to nec209's topic in Medical Science
Sorry but what does aging and living longer have to do with cancer? -
That is not the point his cutty behavior is inappropriate behavior for these groups.It does not take much to sum up I have no knowledge of rocket science and I have english problem has I'm having hard time understanding the replies here given to me of the engineering problems of the other propulsion system.I ask 2 or 3 times for confirmation of my ability to understand the reply given to me and has gone up in smoke. It is one thing to say we cannot use this propulsion system do to xx but he seems to come off has a preacher of chemical rockets and he seems to think he knows more than what NASA,airforce and most mainstream scientist of what they are doing..He is also doing same to Moontanman posts and some of the other members here. So I'm done with this thread it is not going anywhere , I will take my questions on this to other message board where the air is not contaminated and where some one is not preacher . It is too bad that this thread has gone like this but it has .And I don't think the discusses with DH can go on has the last 3 or 4 post was kinda of rude posts here.And I think there is language problem here too that is also causing the posts here to go like this. Well you guys can post in this thread and discusses what ever has I'm done here , please do not reply to my post here but PM me has I'm scared any more posting will get this thread locked or turn into flame war.
-
Moontanman that is why I'm not going to debate any more with DH has it is just leading to rude posts has he seems to have some fetish to chemical rockets and any thing other than chemical rockets is crackpot idea.He also seems to think I have a fetish to laser and want space mining and space colony ASAP. I will take back that comment of trying to get to stange 2 and if we can get space cost down by 50% that would be major breathgrouth so it go like this. 1. Race that learns how to go in space ( satellite,space probes ,robots.spacewalk and space station. 1A Race that learns how to bring space cost down so we can go in space more and do more things 2. Race thant learn how to bring the cost down more so it can take of like the steam engine or combustion engine to open up space for the majority and allow space mining and space colony 3.Race that larns how to travel from one star system to other star system like in star trek I will take back that comment of majority of people on earth going into space even 10% of the people on earth going into space and space mining and space colony has we are way way way too primitive to try to do this but may be advanced enough to try to research to get to stange 1A . Also to be fair there is research going into space plane/ rocket a space plane/rocket on a rocket the rocket takes it up into space and the space plane/rocket unhooks and shoots off has little fuel is needed in space so you do not need a big fuel tank .Other is plane takes off and use a jet engine to x altitude and than the rocket engine kicks in and other is like Virgin Galactic a space plane/rocket on plane that takes it up to x altitude and the space plane/rocket unhooks and shoot off . You Blue Origin the Blue Origin New Shepard reusable launch vehicle is a manned rocket which is being developed by Blue Origin the New Shepard craft is planned to be a vertical take-off/vertical landing it is SSTO a DC-X.You have Kankoh-maru vertical takeoff and landing, single-stage to orbit, reusable launch vehicle and Dream Chaser planned crewed suborbital and orbital spacecraft being .So yes there is lots of stuff happing in the private sector and some of these may be only LEO now but over years they will learn and go in space.They will bring the cost down and take up rich people and do more what are government cannot do has governments are not good at doing things like the private sector other than war time and fear of death . But the reason I did not talk about it or have a big party with champagne and cake has I do not think they will bring the cost down enough .Yes a new small space shuttle ,SSTO and space plane/rock combo,reusable launch vehicle will bring cost down but I do not think it will be enough and the same with space-x.There is only so much you can do with chemical. The car engine like the jet engine has moving parts that is why every year it is more fuel efficient has they making less moving parts and a rocket engine is more like plumbing and next to impossible to make more fuel efficient other than they could do is build better nozzles and valves not say new stong lightweight material with advanced chemistry and nanotechnology.But still I do not think this will bring the cost down enough. That is why NASA and agency are looking into other propulsion systems not say mainstream scientist are starting to look into other propulsion systems.But this poster DH is saying everyone at NASA and other agency not say airforce and mainstream scientist are all crack pot ideas and chemical rockets are the only way too go ,and he saying get of scfi and I'm sure he is a lobbyist that wants to do away of human space flight and go to space probes ,robots and hubble only. That is why I will not debate any more with him has he has a fetish to chemical rockets and he is not replying in constructive manner that me explain some of the engineering problems of the other propulsion systems why it is scfi now and why it is not reality now.
-
I will like more information on the space elevator and launch loop the engineering problems and the only thing I read on the space elevator if the cable snapped it would do massive damage I guess do to it being so high so it may be safety why they will not build it in the future even if we had technology to build it very high. Also note I was kinda harsh with DH I would not want to get my posts removed or reputation removed do to posting being kinda rude do to kinda miniature flame war of rude posting.
-
You seem to be not able to read I'm NOT I say again NOT talking about making a UFO, Enterprise D,warp drive or going to other star system?I'm qualified to say we are not close to space mining or space colony do to money problem and the last time I chacked not even 0.00000003% of people on earth have gone up into space. We are no where close to stange 2. Look Chemical propulsion and may be Fission propulsion if it gets enough money is the only thing that will take us up into space.In space we could use Ion propulsion ,plasma propulsion solar sails to take us places much faster. Read my post again .What is wrong with trying to get to stange 2? No you false all scfi shows are stange 3 not stange 2.You do not seem to know too much about scfi . You could categorize any space race in 3 stages . 1. Race that learns how to go in space ( satellite,space probes ,robots.spacewalk and space station. 2. Race thant learn how to bring the cost down so it can take of like the steam engine or combustion engine to open up space for the majority and allow space mining and space colony 3.Race that larns how to travel from one star system to other star system like in star trek We are in stange 1 and have not found any technology or propulsion system to take us to stange 2. No you seem to be worked up that I'm hooked on laser propulsion and derailing every post I make. Also you did not say any thing about space loop ,,launch loop ,space gun and space fountain and any thing more on the space elevator why these thing will not work.
- 148 replies
-
-1
-
You not looking at the big picture so that me explain .The propulsion system are fusion propulsion ,fission propulsion , laser propulsion ,chemical propulsion ,Ion propulsion , plasma propulsion ,microwave propulsion ,anti-matter propulsion also many types of laser propulsion all mainstream what scientist are talking about . The fringe propulsion are negetive energy/negetive matter,levitation,anti-gravity or megnetic propulsion and I will explain later . Well we can put Ion propulsion or plasma propulsion in the trash can has the thrust is too low to take stuff up into space.And it looks like laser propulsion and microwave propulsion is going in the trash can too. We do not have fusion so there is no point putting money into that to we get a working fusion power station. And anti-matter ( very very very costly (way more than chemical propulsion) , very hard to make and cannot be stored has fuele has we do not know how to store it yet.It is very very costly and even if in 50 or 100 years we can make anti-matter very cheap and can store it and use it like fuel well it will be banned in earth thus it can only be used for deep space .Has size of rock would destory all of New York city.No one will take that chance. So anti-matter we can put in a trash can and fusion we will put on hold to we get a working fusion power station. And fission propulsion not read much about it but looks like it may work .Great we just put laser propulsion ,microwave propulsion ,Ion propulsion ,plasma propulsion, anti-matter in the trash can.That gives us only fission propulsion has we have no fusion working power station. So all they have is fission propulsion and chemical propulsion. Now the fringe propulsion is there negetive energy/negetive matter no one has made it or seen it in world so may be one day we may make it my chance you cannot give money to people to try to make some thing that is may not be real. Now levitation or anti-gravity no one has made it or seen this in world so may be it is real but no one has discovered it yet or we may never discover it do to it does not exit. And megnetic propulsion well we do not know how to make a monopole. So the fringe propulsion there is no point putting money into it because it has high chance of not being real and even if some of this is real we would have no idea how to go about research it !! So if such a fringe propulsion does exit it be discovered by chance has we have no idea about how to research it has there is no math or theory about finding out if this exits or not or how to go about researching it . some other propulsion out there we do not know about like green water ,crystal or special element well it is beyond fringe and we have no idea if such other propulsion exit or not so no point putting money into it and hope it may exit.Well great we just ruled out no money going into fringe propulsion has I explain why above. So that just leaves us with fission propulsion and chemical propulsion and may be fusion propulsion if we can get a working fusion power station . The only non propulsion system is space loop ,space elevator,Launch loop ,Space gun and Space fountain and these are not propulsion system and I'm sure you going to reply here and say some of these may not work do to ***** **** *** Great so that gives us only fission propulsion we can put research into or one of the non propulsion ie space loop ,space elevator,Launch loop ,Space gun and Space fountain and if you reply here and say this will not work do to **** **** than the only answer well thats make a war on poverty and hope we are smart enough to make everyone rich like Bill Gates if not well we will never go to stange 2 and stange 2 will be scfi.