Ges

only effect that it runs counter is gravity force being result of a mass, and even there isn't running counter effect but counter nature of gravity force that is because it isn't supposed to change anything, but to explain better why does everything happens like it does

I disagree. I've explained a whole process why I think it is not so It seams that way because it is almost the same as the standard gravity theory but only difference is that gravity is result of mass and I say that gravity is counter force of pressure that holds up in the center of the planet because matter of the planet is being sucked outwards into the space

balloon at 2 ATM has different mass than those of 1 ATM. Also, that mass od 2 ATM will take greater volume than those of 1 ATM when they burst in same conditions So by "pressure being triggered by vacuum" i meant only that any matter in vacuum will tend to fill that vacuum, therefor creating a pressure

different masses produce different gravitational field strengths depending on the volume of those the masses. The greater volume of matter is the stronger planet's sucking (gravitational) force is.

Sayonara, you are confusing me. I don't what do you mean? Please direct me on part which is problem but mechanism is practically the same as with the gravity. Only difference is that gravity is result of mass and I say that gravity is counter force of pressure that holds up in the center of the planet because matter of the planet is being sucked outwards into the space

so theres no problem... gas from balloon will escape into the vacuum in undefined directions

where did you conclude that idea???

it doesn't confront what I'm saying: on earth, oxygen is all around, making a pressure tend to be even everywhere where are the same conditions (height, temperature) because it is drawn towards earth because of my proposed negative vacuum force (or as it is known now - gravity) and by bumping into each other In space in vacuum, there's absence of all matter. So when matter comes into the space, it tends to fill that emptiness by runing in all directions. The stability of matter decides how fast will that occur, so gases will fly instantly, liquid will become gas and then follow pattern of gas, and solids will first try to become liquid, following the same pattern. Examine the experiments of water exposed to vacuum which demonstrate exactly that what I've said So, when a balloon filled with gas is released in space, a molecules of gas will tend to run apart due absence of any surrounding pressure that holds them together

bumping into what? the pressure is caused by molecules inside of the balloon trying to fill empty space of vacuum

the pressure inside the balloon is triggered by vacuum

yes, I'm aware of that but there is a force: what would happen if you would release a balloon full of air into the space? The pressure inside the balloon would raise so high that a balloon would burst, because air inside balloon tends to fill vacuum evenly. That is a vacuum force! A tendency of matter to fill vacuum space

the sucking force of a vacuum acts in all directions outward on the planet - it is not directed in any direction separately. So it only enlarges the planets. But a counter force in planet have direction - towards the center of that planet. So every planet acts as a magnet, trying to suck surrounding matter back, acting basicly the same as a gravitational force. Only difference is that gravitation force is believed to be caused by mass of the planet and I say it is caused by volume of the planet and volume is caused by vacuum stretching of the planet

this what I'm talking about is not so much different than a standard theory of gravity! My explanation shows better functioning of forces btw. planets and simplifies theory of gravity by giving only one force for all - a vacuum force, which is not braked by a planets mass, but by planets volume - the bigger planet is means the lager is volume on which vacuum force acts means the stronger planets pulling force is. By decreasing in volume, planets tend to be drawn towards bigger planets. It's almost the same as gravity but gravity is not fully explained where it comes form So, examine planets that are ones that attract moons - there's not a rock planet that has a liquid or a gas moon, but it always follows this pattern that a more volume planet has lover volume planet for it's moon: gas can have liquid and solid moons, liquid can have only solid, and solid can only have rocks/asteroids for moons it wants to suck us in all directions, same as it wants to suck all of the planets please, explain what's wrong with it?

a "vacuum force" is just a force of pressure created by a big bang. I've explained with example of bomb explosion. An explosion pushes everything out of the center of the explosion, creating a mayor pressure in the center of the explosion. It is perfectly seen when a bomb detonates under the water - for a short moment, there's a bubble of explosion which pushes surrounding water out, creating a pressure on borders of water and gas of edge of explosion and vacuum inside explosion bubble. Vacuum is acting like in the movies when spaceships hull is breached and air is being sucked out through breached part So same thing is happening to the planets - they are being sucked out into the space by vacuum force, but because they are closed, there's a counter force that we call gravity (but it is not gravity, it is counter force that follows newtons 3. law)

which part doesn't conform to reality? and don't say "all of it" because everything is compared to processes that exists normally in nature