Ges

only effect that it runs counter is gravity force being result of a mass, and even there isn't running counter effect but counter nature of gravity force that is because it isn't supposed to change anything, but to explain better why does everything happens like it does

I disagree. I've explained a whole process why I think it is not so It seams that way because it is almost the same as the standard gravity theory but only difference is that gravity is result of mass and I say that gravity is counter force of pressure that holds up in the center of the planet because matter of the planet is being sucked outwards into the space

balloon at 2 ATM has different mass than those of 1 ATM. Also, that mass od 2 ATM will take greater volume than those of 1 ATM when they burst in same conditions So by "pressure being triggered by vacuum" i meant only that any matter in vacuum will tend to fill that vacuum, therefor creating a pressure

different masses produce different gravitational field strengths depending on the volume of those the masses. The greater volume of matter is the stronger planet's sucking (gravitational) force is.

Sayonara, you are confusing me. I don't what do you mean? Please direct me on part which is problem but mechanism is practically the same as with the gravity. Only difference is that gravity is result of mass and I say that gravity is counter force of pressure that holds up in the center of the planet because matter of the planet is being sucked outwards into the space

so theres no problem... gas from balloon will escape into the vacuum in undefined directions

where did you conclude that idea???

it doesn't confront what I'm saying: on earth, oxygen is all around, making a pressure tend to be even everywhere where are the same conditions (height, temperature) because it is drawn towards earth because of my proposed negative vacuum force (or as it is known now - gravity) and by bumping into each other In space in vacuum, there's absence of all matter. So when matter comes into the space, it tends to fill that emptiness by runing in all directions. The stability of matter decides how fast will that occur, so gases will fly instantly, liquid will become gas and then follow pattern of gas, and solids will first try to become liquid, following the same pattern. Examine the experiments of water exposed to vacuum which demonstrate exactly that what I've said So, when a balloon filled with gas is released in space, a molecules of gas will tend to run apart due absence of any surrounding pressure that holds them together

bumping into what? the pressure is caused by molecules inside of the balloon trying to fill empty space of vacuum

the pressure inside the balloon is triggered by vacuum

yes, I'm aware of that but there is a force: what would happen if you would release a balloon full of air into the space? The pressure inside the balloon would raise so high that a balloon would burst, because air inside balloon tends to fill vacuum evenly. That is a vacuum force! A tendency of matter to fill vacuum space

the sucking force of a vacuum acts in all directions outward on the planet - it is not directed in any direction separately. So it only enlarges the planets. But a counter force in planet have direction - towards the center of that planet. So every planet acts as a magnet, trying to suck surrounding matter back, acting basicly the same as a gravitational force. Only difference is that gravitation force is believed to be caused by mass of the planet and I say it is caused by volume of the planet and volume is caused by vacuum stretching of the planet

this what I'm talking about is not so much different than a standard theory of gravity! My explanation shows better functioning of forces btw. planets and simplifies theory of gravity by giving only one force for all - a vacuum force, which is not braked by a planets mass, but by planets volume - the bigger planet is means the lager is volume on which vacuum force acts means the stronger planets pulling force is. By decreasing in volume, planets tend to be drawn towards bigger planets. It's almost the same as gravity but gravity is not fully explained where it comes form So, examine planets that are ones that attract moons - there's not a rock planet that has a liquid or a gas moon, but it always follows this pattern that a more volume planet has lover volume planet for it's moon: gas can have liquid and solid moons, liquid can have only solid, and solid can only have rocks/asteroids for moons it wants to suck us in all directions, same as it wants to suck all of the planets please, explain what's wrong with it?

a "vacuum force" is just a force of pressure created by a big bang. I've explained with example of bomb explosion. An explosion pushes everything out of the center of the explosion, creating a mayor pressure in the center of the explosion. It is perfectly seen when a bomb detonates under the water - for a short moment, there's a bubble of explosion which pushes surrounding water out, creating a pressure on borders of water and gas of edge of explosion and vacuum inside explosion bubble. Vacuum is acting like in the movies when spaceships hull is breached and air is being sucked out through breached part So same thing is happening to the planets - they are being sucked out into the space by vacuum force, but because they are closed, there's a counter force that we call gravity (but it is not gravity, it is counter force that follows newtons 3. law)

which part doesn't conform to reality? and don't say "all of it" because everything is compared to processes that exists normally in nature

Let me present my theory about gravity: Big bang made of a space a vacuum. Same thing happens when a bomb detonates - there's a mere part of time when explosion pushes surrounding air and particles out of center of explosion, creating almost a vacuum (lets say it does create it because conditions of any explosion on earth aren't perfect). So on same principle universe is expanding - like never ending explosion that is pushing all most out all of particles, leaving in it only few and a lot of vacuum space. ok, now let's go on gravity: over past few years, geological studies has shown that all planets are expanding over time. Since those expandings aren't product of some new mass that is coming out of space, it is obvious that planets inflate because of some force. I say that vacuum of space is expanding planets. Let me explain it with this picture of vacuum pump from wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kolbenluftpumpe_hg.jpg Imagine that a force that is pulling out a pump handle is a vacuum force. Because of big bang, vacuum force is pulling out in all directions constantly. Imagine that cork on the other end of pump handle is a matter of which planet is made If you could pull out a pump handle so strong, a glass container from which you are sucking air would brake inwards. But don't forget about Newtons 3. law - Whenever a particle A exerts a force on another particle B, B simultaneously exerts a force on A with the same magnitude in the opposite direction. So, a gravitation is nothing more than a counter force of vacuum force of space. It is not affected by planet's mass! Also, I have a theory on planet proportions: what is the difference btw. planets, moons and stars - a size and state of matter of which a planet is build: So, small planets are solid, medium are liquid and big are gas and biggest are plasma (suns). It all goes along perfectly with my theory of gravity as a counter force of space vacuum force because smaller planet is, weaker is force that rips particles apart that makes that planet. As planet grows bigger, solid particles gets ripped into liquid state (like earths liquid core). On same patters, the largest planets are gas giants, on which a vacuum force and counter force have ripped particles into molecules, therefor forming gas state of the planet. On the most largest planets - suns - particles are torn into most basic particles, atoms, which are torn by vacuum force and counter force by such force that they are looping outwards and inwards of the planet in such force that when they collide with other particle, they create a fission reaction. Also, recent thermal scans of our Sun show that a temperature is much lower inside of the sun than it is in the surface/atmosphere of the Sun So, that explains why a black hole has never been seen - it doesn't exist! A "black hole" is nothing more than a counter force of vacuum, so strong that it draws all other smaller particles to it.