roger4464

That is your assumption it may not work!!, you have the wright of your though ;i don't want to hear it: I can tell ! You don't understand ; Relativity Phenomenon, when, ''Motion is involve'':__________''Roger Dynamic Motion''

Now ! the opposite side at 180 degrees , the same event is in evolution ,and a force rebelling the opposed side also in evolution; so we are in the presence of two body changing size continually as they are rebelling because of their equal sized, being pouched away from each other. the force between the two body is always equal to the one resisting created from the on coming particles call__ ''NOTING'' ....the invisible__ ''WALL''..........More later in time: Roger Dynamic Motion

Yes___;energy source ''Force of Gravity'' go to Google ''write..............(..Roger Dynamic Motion models)

This will be obscure, to you, may be: The resisting force is clock wise and do not carry a momentum ; in fact it is half of the generator for possible positive momentum=linear displacement: (the inertia of the system, one of those resistive forces , at its contact point with the track, is no concern, for the moment !)

NOT so fast ! I'm getting there and i will be happy to take questions once i am done elaborating my understanding that fits in with my concept and technical approach.

So to follow on, with my theory of the transformation of the particles, call ''Noting' the smallest one existing,is the cube with it's 8 corners at the center, so,at that size, can not be detected be any means, till they meet at the center, adding up to each other to become some thing, and finally be seen and so on, to become bigger taking space and rebelling the on forcing their way in ; so fare no presence ,of attracting force......More later in time

OK ! FIRST, question from your preamble; wanting to know ? It can be used for transportation , build like ....''same as~Segway'' . It can be build, as rides for amusement parks or circus. with a different technique and model.___ 2e question ''any theory''?...... First. No such force! call force of attraction in the Universe acting between planets. All my working models would not work if it wasn't from that comprehension. to understand this, one must live trough the birth of matter at the beginning of the Universe and understand the elements needed to achieve this process, and to understand where the particles are originating from, and understand their shape and (size?) ;like the smallest particles existing and why? that small. _____ ''Creation of matter''= The Noting versus Matter. You are some thing when i see you and noting when i don't~~take ''NOTICE'', that the word ''NOTING'' is the name of the smallest particles existing ... More later in time.

look up Model # 35 or others ; the answer to your questions ,can be found, in the first year ''physic college book'' << Please do not ask me any more questions pretending to my knowledge and understanding about ???? ;its a wasted time to you and me.

You Sir ! are fishing for knowledge, i congratulate you for so doing; as to predictions about the real world you may have learned from physics literature, and been directed to a certain comprehension, but to state that my models do not open the door to new outcome tells me what i know is not going to be easy to be understood by any one, yet , with out the proper questions.. I do not drink and do not smoke; been working, ''building dynamic model'', since 1976, so i understand dynamic energy from its base . Lets start with ''Earth Motion'' the~ Relativity Phenomenon ~ does not predict, ''Earth Motion'' to be possible !

A body that is positioned at the equator ring (satellite).... and i can look AT it..... ''24-7 WITH MY EYES'' sort of speech and never loose site of it ''BECAUSE'' we are both synchronize with the rotation of the earth ( that is not something relevant with my work ''building models'' . SO ! what can i say ?

Giving the model # 39 that you posted ; which ''body'' would you identified, as to be, a G.o satellite ?

When the word ''Satellite'' is, the mentioned element, in the question ; i must refer to, ''Space motion Concept''... because ,no absolute contract is needed with the surface of the earth, as to , Earth motion concept , do: << Yes a Space motion model ,SATELLITE can be put in orbit , and keeps its spin angulare velocity, and, its roundabout journey around the earth, which is; inescapable ..naturally :........................Roger dynamic motion

I REALY!~ DO NOT GRASP THAT QUESTION; SORRY! Which body in the model, would be the Satellite. Specified !.... please.!..........

I have many models posted on you tube and also on Google,( Roger dynamic motion) choose 1 model with its # number.and ask specific question(s) designating a certain body(s) with its position ,top, right,left ,out side the ring or inside the ring with its color, and shape, if it can be any help, to direct my answer :

Your mansion about; ''DOUBLE'' pendulums ,is a good way to analyse the technical used, in this case __'' except''; due to the fact that one of the pendulum, is only transferring its weight to a body inside the ring,..''as function'' that pendulum has been avoided with and other model similar;..the weight of the body inside the ring has been modified, ( increased ) to replaced the weight of the pendulum BOB : ''Roger Dynamic Motion''

vue !

I was wrong to tell you 45 degrees ..The max..... is~ 22.5 degrees because of the reaction force = the total momentum divided by ''two''. sorry about that.. . I must tell you the model 39 has not been design ,other than for a leveled surface.. horizontal........

Hi! << To be short in my explanation ''about'' 45 degrees ; yes, up the slope , is possible to conceive a mechanism that would obey to the mentioned degrees; but that would require more traction at the track's surface ..( Teeth ) between the two components in contact the ''ring and track'' >> ( by the way! your thought, had substance) :

With all do respect ; I believe my answer was over your imagination in regard to the position of one particular body concerning its position in the system of dynamic motion ..i am not going to answer to question ''which'' answers are in all physics literature; why should I ? I did not think this discussion was a ''GAME'' Roger Dynamic motion concepts.

Tell me what your answer would be at your question; if you can not refer, to the model i have i mind ?

Giving the body supporting the pendulum inside the ring, the Gravitation force must be aligned 180 degree with the ring( its center)its contact point and the contact point of the ring with the track and finally to the center of the earth ~~~~ and moving on to the right (I mean the ring and all )..velocity= 2Pi radians ..360 degrees .

Dynamic Motion; may be identifier has to be ;~ ''Space Motion'', Gravitational Motion , Earth Motion . ( three types of motion;which mean three independents concepts ). So! to elaborate with the proper information, i need to know the Model # number in order to apply the right concept :.............. . Roger Dynamic Motion..

Wich model # number are you referring to?

Hello, My name is Roger Larouche. I would like to discuss my projects regarding my dynamic motion models. I would like to get to know members of the community that might be interested in such a concept. If you would like to know more about these models, just reply and I will be happy to answer questions you may have! www.youtube.com/user/ROGER4464 www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nYY9G9C9Mw