Top Boy

Thank you for your comment(s). The section you reference must be from a previous thread submission. I believe the sentence is grammatically correct. The verb "identified" is used as a copulative verb, in the first part of the entire sentence structure. The middle of the sentence contains commas separating nonrestrive subordinate clauses and contains "to respond" which is another verb. You may have considered "to respond" an infinitive and considered it one of three things: noun, adjective, or adverb; yet, the verb usage here is considered an action verb. The third verb is "attaching" and is considered a transitive verb considering the object following the usage. The object "a new perception" qualifies the verb "attaching" to be transitive. I did not use any "be" verbs in the referenced sentence. Often when people read sections of text without "be" verbs they find the structure to be poor in grammar. Sometimes when I write I like to remove "be" verbs from structure. I do this to test myself and to make for an interesting read. My teachers always taught that writing without "be" verbs contains a higher degree of difficulty. I assume that is regarded by readers more than writers. And, I am not sure of your remark where you stated "wuju". Did I use "wuju" in my writing somewhere? Please advise.

Well, my note certainly was more to inform rather than to antagonize. Whether you see my remarks transitory or "snide irony" serves no appeal. Regardless, Ophiolite I did want to point out, where you said my last response was "...the first post you have made that I managed to understand, more or less fully, at one sitting..." - my assumption refers that as a good thing. I would like to think that I provide, more than rhetoric, intellectual pitch. To explain my posts, I offer this description about myself. I believe the physical world we live or recognize as society is largely depicted through our conscious actions. In that, I understand the predominance of the actualization is systemic from subconscious ideology. Subconscious in society is seen as the sixth sense, meta-physical chakra of the third eye, represent crossing point of the physical and non-physical realms, "spirit" by those who seek spiritual guidance, and most consider it one's truth. I like to call it intellect, humor. Therefore, whatsoever this is with label, I deem it relevant and dominant in my communication. I speak many languages and am witness to distant lands; and, my understandings are based on these experiences with my capability of patterning how people translate words versus ideas. When I write on this site and you take the opportunity to read my scribe please know I am often noting a subconscious 'global' view into conscious forum. I finished writing a book earlier this year and my publisher is about to release my concentration, in January. My book is written in like fashion as I articulate on this forum, so you may not be able to understand it at one sitting. As with my book this forum is for contemplating, debating, and intellectually developing a conceptual bridge between the formable ideas of people. I appreciate that it might take you more than one sitting to understand me, so you might not judge ponder too quickly; consequently, you would actually take time to realize my intellect and your intellect are in motion instead of a quasi-breach in momentum. On a quicker mention, my subconscious views are uniquely layered which might be why it takes several readings; yet the simplest meaning is typically the one that I have really offered. Example: Things are not difficult, but people make things difficult. If we see something as "difficult", then the only reason it is difficult is because that is what we have independently named or agreed for this hypothetical thing. Thus, we (the people) have made difficulty the principle reason of something more important than the rationale of what we suppose it should otherwise consider. Case in point, the original sentence states the concentration of this pseudo example, but people will find the argument to debate if something is difficult or not; only based on their definition of difficulty. A debate then, in this example, is senseless and mutable though never formable. We the people are also the world, and that is descriptive of subconscious into conscious forum. Once again, John Nash's theory is understated through this effort of how perplexing the reality of things become in complex thought rather than simple understanding. A Beautiful Mind suggests: the venture one demonstrates in undermining the vastness of a societal dysfunction by correlating the associative degrees of separation into a volume that offers a relevant position, to all variables included, in the total venture. To close, I took Gilded's advice and chose to offer text in context to the threads concurrence; albeit rivalry to his opponent. Wherefore, in your anticipation remember I gave my opinion and clearly exclaimed that Russia might differ with their understanding. However, I do not speak for Russia and simply referenced information available in most encyclopedias or historical reference tools. The two front fight for Finland began in 1922 under Russian leadership and lasted until 1991, whitherwards (archaic usage) their sovereignty was gifted by the Americans regarded in his recent demeanor. Now, I have offered method for antagonizing, and I quickly step down from the notion. America indirectly gifted sovereignty to Finland as we ultimately guaranteed the Monarchy for the Brits with our involvement. First through underground support efforts ultimately ending with our direct application of raising the American flag, on the mount of liberty for both Finland and England. For both opinions towards me or the idea of "American(s)", I emphatically state that without our overzealous commitment to the pursuit of freedom this world undoubtedly would receive your surrender; and, once again our distinguished volley to liberate your countrymen. I, too, am disenchanted with some current choices of American policy or determination. We are learning as a young country how to win stride in friendship, it is a progress not easily attainable. Especially when our history has required our conscious to defend ourselves and those who we find our allies for peace and everyone's freedom. I believe that began with King John in 1218, with his conformity and Magna Carta. Attacking America or people generally is indirectly a personal attack on yourself; we are different, trust me I clearly see that, but only because some seek peace over the displacement of identity. Yours or mine! How many layers can you find within this simple response.

Gilded, I apologize if I commented out of order; perhaps, I am less aware of how SFN works. I just joined a few days ago, and I assumed we were providing ideas and thoughts to the origin of a thread when we join along. Of course, I understand we are able to join in the banter of the ongoing communication. I was trying to offer my idea of the threads integrity. Maybe you didn't take the time to understand the communication I wrote; whereas not only did I offer my idea, I too included it along the ideology of what I was describing. Your notion to offer an askewed perception or insecure judgment is unwarranted. I am a Doctor of Naturopathy, I rarely would find myself taking anything for health challenge. And, in my professional opinion, I find pharmacology in any form a toxic imbalance for the human body. I find food as both resource and medicine of life and one's body. If my ideas are not rational to you, then why don't you ask me to write a new response for you to conceive my thought for a minute time unit. I hope to offer my opinion, without infringing on others' valid opinions. I believe you would call this Eduskunta in your country, or proportional representation - so no one party maintains to much control. And, by the way the Brits never attacked because Finland has either been under Swedish or Russian control most of its history. I believe the Russians would consider it until 1991.

we are so easily amused by the hysterical theories based on men, such as DNA. where we should find our simple minds is that DNA should be understood completely different. simply as lineage, never destiny. destiny is thought provoked, and can not be altered based on directional coordinates such as North, South, East, and West. which should be the more appropriately targeted DNA coordinates, as the applicable measures to understand DNA. For DNA is strictly a chart of what has occurred in order to remedy a challenge that presents itself, it is like our secretary, never our governor. Our governor is our soul, which writes our code that permits the conduit of energy to perform, and allows our secretary to scribe. Simple, simple, simple. DNA are threads to understand where we have come from, not ever underestimating where we might be headed, just as this simple forum, we operate on reading past threads not predicting our fellowships opportunity to express her/his/their potential. we should use our dna as a grounding for identifiying homeostasis, not by conjuring mad science and defining pretentious mutations.

I believe the study of understanding you seek is most easily found, when you remove any barrier, wall that prevents the humble truth that easily provides a benefit for all participants. Whereas, you might make yourself crazy in the interim with entertaining your ideas of what others are thinking. That is the sum of nothing, as we are easily conditioned to guess and predict based on our own personal experiences of what others do and don't do, because of what we would do or not do. RAMBLE... The significant exposure of the relative truth identified by representing the simplest understanding, without single opportunity for another to respond in a positive or negative alignment, thus attaching a new perception to the origin of thought. We are capable to identify truth, it is the elemental strucutre of the independent identity of each volume of matter. Regardless of common disbelief, we are symptoms of our vulnerability. We are perfection actualized. In that, we deem appropriate analogies, to offset our reality by endorsing the symbolism of irrelevance. If you want to practice be sure to identify and equally credit ying and yang principles, in the same sentence. First and last priority are shifts of balance.

We are so desperate to locate an "intelligent life source". When will we figure out what an "intelligent life source" actually looks or acts like. Are we basing it off our limited ideas? Of course, we are looking for it so intensely, it would hide from our view. Intelligent life is recognized and presents itself when one opens their mind enough to accept and associate the applicable gestures which are uniquely blended in a mold called appreciation. The hidden secrets are located just in front of our ideas, too bad we seem to put them behind in our "intelligent" priorities. 10% of our mind's use is 90% of our lost reality. OPEN SESAME...

I appreciate your candor, I duly respect the partner of discipline we have both elected and courted to experience this blunder in the Middle East, once again. I also respect your understanding to quakes, although please know that I have a different opinion of most theoretic ideas (also known as popular science). One thing I was taught early in life, my own mind is as brilliant as it identifies strengths and weaknesses along the great minds we have chosen to acknowledge along the chartered distances of time. In that, my strength in life, seems to direct me in a light which easily identifies patterns. Patterns are something this planet has always followed, that is why we typically define much of probability based on the pages of "almanacs". In the course of a few hours of researching, more on terminology and geography, nautical conditions, and trajectory I was able to easily identify the pattern that was drifting under our radar screens. I wasn't even eating a donut and having a cup of java. I was interested. So, those who frequent these systems and receive pay for such conditional studies should be more accountable. After all, on 9/11 your Majesty the Queen flew our flag and presented our patriotic hymns at the changing of her guard. On that day, I remembered my valour carries her crown in equal respect and patronage. We spent, in this country, millions of dollars to investigate and identify if we had the available information, if our fellowships in Europe could have provided us more information, if the information was avialable why wasn't it communicated, etc. Did we not learn our lesson on that very date, with our cost of 3,000 people, how stupidly we miss our mark when we don't oblige the same commonality to the rest of the world. The key to 9/11 and other disasters is communication. We have the internet, we have the cellular advantage, we use these things for convenience instead of assistance. I can not imagine the idea of "friendly fire", we should not be shooting in fear; rather distinctively targeting our persistence in the remedies that render an honor to protect and provide a common defense.

one human life deserves quite more than a single excuse from another person whom might reflect they could have had the opportunity to source the information...that isn't or never will be acceptable for me to agree. i lived in saudi arabia for two years, and worked in a war room for the US President's forward commanding officer of Air Defense Artillery for the Kindgom of Saudi Arabia. I was an attache from the Pentagon for this officer during the first gulf war. I know our technologies have advanced since then, but I do want to offer my backdrop of understanding in tracking systematic expressions of agressive behavior. During the stance before, during, and after the climax of The Gulf War (#1), each indication of launch of ballistic missiles by Sadaam inbound towards troops, our very capable war room officers immediately backtracked and reverse calculated every possible target in relevance. Within 2-minutes those calculations were strategically outlined and implemented for attack routine suggestions. With the erratic display of experiences the planet projected over the past ten days, we could have at least spent those same 2-minutes to calculate some ideas, rather than spend several million-billion taxpayer dollars to help bury 30,000 people and reduce the amount of dis-ease which could spread back our direction. Our ignorance and disbelief in our capability to excel, in these simple areas of life are rather boring, when we find ourselves reactive vs. altruistic PROACTIVE. Land of the Free (we seem to have lost that), Home of the Brave (we seem to easily give that up). I am proud to consider myself a life-long member of the United States Army, even though I am in the public sector of life, and am not suiting a uniform, I will always consider the oath to protect my country as a duty of valor; which I extend in help to any culture or person that can benefit from its truth. America and its resounding virture was instilled by its founding fathers, not as an attitude or pretension; rather the virtue that could be easily recognized and upheld by the promise to extend a reach in the presence of hardship where people were thought to be in harms way. For the preamble ends, "...by the people, for the people..."

The 9.0 that we got to receive some media about yesterday was directly proportionate to the devastation witnessed. Check out some of the tracking relevance for the last 10-days of earthquake spectaculars. It began not far from Australia on Dec. 23, with 8.1 scale reading at MacQuerie Island off the ice shelf of Antartica, followed by Alaska 5.1, and then about six others rippling up the coasts of Australia to the Java Trench, Indonesia, before the 9.0 yesterday. There could have been at least a phone call giving some warning that a rippling of quakes (over days) was moving towards populated areas. We need not a better system, but a common belief in "doing right by one-another". The rationale is the aftermath that will undoubtedly cross culture by way of dis-ease; albeit decay, bacteria, and onward developmental phases that are affluent with massive death tolls in a grossly lower socio-economic arenas.

Well, you can see it as a joke, or a simple understanding. I have a ball. Could me, I have great fun. But the fun, turns out to be plastic (fake) and hollow (empty feeling), it is too blue; meaning it is too sad. That is why I put in the tear drop. It's lots of fun, until someone gets hurt. So, the two worlds, pressure and depth, cause one to cry. Thus, a tear. Maybe that is just how I read the idea. Either concept, works with a conclusive answer for the riddle, that demonstrates a ball somewhat blue. Another simple definition is that the blue and spherical "measurements" would be equal. Or you could ask, more blue or spherical - than what?

OK, first we think then we imagine. So, we think about how much we drank and imagine what we must feel like. Thus we create the symptoms previously suggested. Hangover is a definition of a state of being, if you drink a lot of alcohol, you actually alter your alkaline and base levels. When you increase your alkaline (or acid) levels you degree certain symptoms. One could be headache. Headache is typically caused when your capillaries are restrictred and blood flow altered to your brain. If you want to alleviate the throbbing or headache condition, then put your feet in a tub and splash cold water a dozen times on your feet, this will cause your brain activity to reverse your constricted capillaries and remove the tension caused by the altered alkaline level. You can add water, too, this will reduce the alkaline base. If you have many of the dehydration affects from alcohol levels, like cotton mouth, you can quickly offer remedy by holding a tea bag under your tongue for 20-30 minutes. The tea bag should be green or white tea, decaffeinated. This will get the medicinal affect into your blood stream much faster than drinking and metabolising the fluid. In fact, put a tea bag in your pocket in case you don't wake up at home. And, of course, your conditions could be directly influenced by the person you wake up with...therefore the internal scream might cause altered states of being.

In the spectrum of light we see the color of the spectrum which is not available. Therefore, the ball being blue, means it has all the other colors of the spectrum confined, thus offering our variable to be blue. In this understanding, the ball is not blue... Now, the ball being hollow, must mean that there is two halves to the sphere, thus presenting two more measurable sides of the color missing, being blue. In this the blue would be more than the sphere, considering the inside of the halves hosting another sizeable amount of blue. Finally, the riddle would be an eyeball, because it is a ball, and is holow when seen through the pupil, yet has two diameters of blue, the inside near pupil and the outside near the cornea. Thus two diameters, of the ball, inner and outer would be linear length and the iris would be blue and depth. The two worlds of pressure and depth equal one tear. Is the tear hollow? It must be, because it begins at one pressue of oxygen, projects a second element of wetness, and ends at another dimension of water. Another symbol for this riddle is the true astrological sign for pisces, which is )I( - blue is measured differently than size, giving irrelevance in how we measure.