Endy0816

Then stop with the straw men and start acknowledging that there are explanations to many if not all of the points you've brought up. That is the behavior that defines science denial.

Has any of this been published in a peer reviewed journal?

Most of what comes to mind are the more obvious uses. Detection of nuclear radiation, smoke alarms, signal recievers, etc. A bit out there but maybe a jeweled personal radiation detector, if it could be made simple enough, Glow red = danger. I could see a number of locations in the world where that might appeal at present.

Two pieces of yarn. I lay one down and I lay the other so that they both intersect at one end. > From a 4 dimensional viewpoint, neither piece of yarn is moving. From a 3 dimensional viewpoint I see two dots moving closer together. Motion "real" in one dimension becomes unreal when considered from a higher dimension.

^stable. Although now I am wondering how a fresh black hole would taste.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II It is remarkably ignorant to claim that the victory was solely dependent upon any one country. If Jefferson didn't consider non-white males "men", then Jefferson's quotes are entirely self consistent. He did end up freeing slaves and allowing some to "escape" but he also kept a number. He may or may not have had offspring by one of his slaves. He was conflicted on the issue like many others in his day were. The country and world have changed since then. We still have a ways to go before we all live in liberty and treat the next man as our brother, but we are making progress. edit: I was mainly thinking the Townshend taxes and the Stamp Act. The reasoning behind the taxes was justified. The lack of say in how much was taken or how the taxes were utilized was the issue.

You ask if the country is evil while enjoying the freedom to read and post on a US based and American owned forum. Must not be all bad. So, you don't think it may have had some impact on the Soviet's invasion? Meh, if you take a look most countries have some sort of sordid history and have utilized deception and propaganda. Soviet propaganda against the US being an obvious example.

You are twisting facts and creating straw men. It was the lack of representation, not the tax itself. Generally speaking taxes increased post Revolution. I'm fairly sure I can speak for my fellow Americans on the fact that WW2 was a joint victory as far as the fall of Germany went. Needed Britain to have a safe harbor to offload troops and supplies. Needed the resistance groups to harass German forces and pass on intelligence. Needed Russia opening up a second front. I'm sure I missed groups and sacrifices with the vastness of the conflict, but suffice to say we don't think we were solely responsible. If you'll notice a good chunk of our foreign debt is to countries who might otherwise wish to attack us in some fashion. We've been using federal debt as ploy since the country was founded. We've only gotten better at it over the years. When you hold government debt, what you really hold is one end of a two-way leash.

Alien civilization: Billions of years Human civilization: Thousands of years 1,000,000,000 compared to 1,000

I think it is just hard for a group to keep up a media presence if their site doesn't depend upon the population influx.

I didn't say it was against the rules I said you should refrain. You are constantly citing yourself and worse not adequately explaining how what you are citing relates to the topic at hand. Stick it in your signature if you want, but stop posting it all over the place. Meh, I'm done with this. You'll either change or you won't.

Then you have to obey the rules. You will be asked to provide clear explanations and refrain from linking to your own material. It is that simple. Many many others claiming to have some deep and secret knowledge have been banned here. Keep that in mind.

I like this one better.

Is there a stickied post about this somewhere? I've seen this question asked a few times now. Possibly I missed it, thought I had looked through most of the stickied posts though.

That really doesn't follow. The discovery has to come first. Then you can say there is a method. Nobody is saying there isn't one. They are saying there are a number issues with finding one. Because of these issues there are better routes we can explore for treatment. The asbestos is fragmenting. The cells are being damaged. The few things that can impact asbestos also kill cells. Physically dragging the asbestos out would also leave a trail of damaged cells and more asbestos fragments. Most probable solution would be tissue replacement. Far simpler proposition. We about have the technology already. Organ printing just needs to develop further.

How you write is as important as what you write. To put it another way even if you have the answer to life itself, you still need to be able to communicate it to others. You keep on and eventually you'll just get banned like many others before you. You are not the first to claim some secret knowledge and you most definitely won't be the last. You want to be a statistic then do so knowing that the world at large isn't going to care.

It is a case of perception vs reality. If we rendered instances of a "2D" flatland next to each other you could walk along and see past, present and future for the little world. Something existing within the world would observe relative motion. You outside of it observe frozen frames. Their time is your distance. I was mainly getting at black holes. Spacial expansion is another one. The dimensions exist on their own terms, best not get too attached.

Stop dramatizing. You are being asked to obey forum rules not on trial. You seem to have latched onto the number 7 and multiplied an arbitrary frequency by it. If you have something more than that, then present it. Otherwise there is really nothing to discuss and no reason this thread needs to stay open.

Would they be only on the surface or distributed throughout? Might be an idea to test conductivity depending on what resources you have available. I do like the idea of sticking a glaze on metals though. Biological iron production is a decent thought too.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bog_iron I was honestly thinking it was something acting as a sacrificial anode. Might be some combination of both but sounds like silicates are the most probable cause.

So if there was an object without any spacial dimensions you would expect it not to exist?

Without a temporal dimension you'd lack the ability to observe events. It would only appear frozen from a 5th dimensional view. Difficult to explain properly but you can't observe an object having a temporal distance of 5 seconds, because you yourself are using time to observe. In theory you could pull it off, but only via sacrificing one of your spacial dimensions or somehow gaining an extra dimension. In either case you still have one dimension you can't traverse freely.

You are assuming that we are incapable of observing the past due to its non-existance. We could just be incapable of observing the past instead. Universe can be likened to a frozen tangle of threads. We only see our particular slice. What we term the present is the unreal construct.

Sodium Polyacrylate maybe? Mainly figuring based on safety and availability for experiments.

Yeah, better to have our medical technology advance instead. Some of these disorders also shine light onto our genetic history and novel gene expression.