Leif

That was hardly a negative judgement! It was a positive judgement from a chiraliacaly biased point of view..I LOVE JOHN...HE IS BRILLIANT!

It is interesting that in quantum mechanical experiments that light behaves much differently when observed then when it is not observed. It seems to me that the determination of a photon being released from a star 300 light years in the past with a defined destination being an atom on a rock on the earth; that this is an observation made by the recipient atom on the rock. The photon will therefor behave as a particle. If their seems to be uncertainty as to interception, the photon is a wave and there is a pronounced ambiguity associated with it's nature.

Fine John, Then please account for the huge negative charge that the earth has accumulated; please enlighten us with your insight. Also explain the fact that the rotation of the galaxies is adequately described in an electric charge model while it is not-described adequately with the gravitational model(prediction and observations do not match);and that the only way that the gravitational model can every possibly work is to fabricate a quality called Dark Matter to account for the discrepancies...dark Matter is un-falsifiable and therefore unscientific. You seem so full of prejudice and blind sighted criticism that I am also sure that you clearly must have a solution in mind and your solution is much, much simpler and better than the one I put forward? I'd be glad to hear your ideas and am awaiting your insights to help clear up these trifling nuisances and paradoxes! Somehow the truth keeps tugging at and eroding away at my algorithms...DANG! The simple idea John is that the predominating result of stellar-fusion is the formation of elements that create an electrical asymmetry resulting in large scale electrical charge gradients. It's not phd material, and maybe you are just way to smart to understand this and it's implications? The problem is certainly not resting with you, rather the universe is not complex enough to satisfy your needs and so the universe must be wrong! I know that Linus Pauling won 2 nobel prizes in his career and that he saw the need for the concept of electro-negativity; and yet you see fit to call this concept rubbish. Please, for the sake of the humble edification of the rest of us, please, please proceed to enlightening us with your incredible insights and fill in the gaps! I for one, and the rest of the world(which I do not speak for) are awaiting the pronouncements of your radiant brilliance. Perhaps you also have a fictitious construct to introduce yourself so that you might account for the difference between your belief and the reality?

It doesn't make obvious sense to me that some of the other negativity scale values, aside from Pauling's give helium the highest value and not fluorine; except that the nobel gases are reactive elements when in a solution of water. I do not see where that gets you with Helium in a non-earth environment where there is no liquid water. But it definitely should have some net positive functional charge attributed to helium here.

Electronegativity values are calculated values, and according to the Pauling Scale the value of Fluorine is the highest followed by Oxygen. According to other scales the nobel gases also exhibit electro-negative values and as I recall Helium is the highest in ONE of them. You put no effort in, then I give you little effort in return...do your own research! Questionable website is just a reflection of this...J.D.G.A.F! I think it obvious that gravity and electricity follow the same inverse square law unless you are speaking about electric scaler waves. And so gravity is well known to be an incredibly weak force...so how can you indicate otherwise in good faith? What you should do is research some of these new concepts and find your own conclusions. I am sure that you have never given consideration to any of this thought before...am I right? Also I think it is a fact that your body has a negative charge and this knowledge is 70 plus years old now. The fact that the earth's crust is highly negatively charged goes back over a 100 years now and is found to have originated with Tesla! I am suggesting that based upon typical composition and densities of matter by and large, that the centre of any galaxy will be negatively charged and the outer regions will have a consequent positive charge....hardly difficult to comprehend? It does indeed seem strange that the universe may yet prove to be a fractal expression in both fantastic and yet unforeseen and yet essential ways? Good Luck and keep me posted! PS...labeling something as drivel is not expressing a fact. The clergy thought Copernicus's helio centric solar system was drivel, and that was probably all they could say in their own defence of epicycles?...don't you think so?

Strange, Cancer is a self-perpetuating metabolic dysfunction. The products of anaerobic metabolism are acidic and effectively and stubbornly block the resoration of aerobic metabolism. There is a simple cure, resulting from Warburgh's work that involves a simple curative diet. Apparently a cure is not what the scientific and medical community is all about; curing cancer is not in their interest!

The scope of a forum post is not like that of a paper suggested in a pier reviewed journal. It is not difficult to simply google the evidence you ask for. The evidence is ubiquitous. And more than this the galaxy itself is an accumulation of positive charge elements created by the bias of stellar fusion products. The charge gradient across the galaxy is the result of mass concentration at the centre. This effectively creates a charge gradient across the galaxy where the centre concentrates negative potential and the periphery is positively charged. Your body is 66% oxygen which gives it a negative charge bias; the most abundant element in the earth's crust is oxygen, which allows the earth to accumulate negative charge. Perhaps the sun itself is accumulating negative charge because it's bias to positive charge fusion products. http://altcosmology.com/The-Sun-is-Electrically-Positively-Charged.php

Endy, I find it interesting that light seems to be the mediating particle of time, the electro-magnetic force, and that light has also throughout human history has been equated with truth. The absence of light is falsehood, and the presence of light is revelation. Interesting that maybe instinctively we have always embraced a relationship with the quality of an idea similarly to the presence or absence of light? This might convey significance to the very nature and essence of thought itself?

And they still haven't figured it out when the solution is 50 years formulated! Spend billions more in research and the solution will still evade them! That is the tragedy of miss-alignment, insulting from a certain perspective to another...or not!

If you want top be obtuse then go right ahead, because you can go down that path to no end...it is a bottomless pit and you can always justify it easily!

The clear bias of stellar fusion results in the creation of highly electro-negative elements. This is results in an electrical asymmetry where a net effective positive charge is the result of this process. This results in stellar and galactic charge gradients which account for the fact that 99% of the visible universe is in a PLASMA STATE!!! This means that the electric force is the dominant force in the cosmos and that gravity is much less important. The relative density of stars though out accounts for the gradient.

A photon cannot be emitted randomly. This means that the source cannot emit the photon until the destination has been determined. When you look out at night upon a star 300 light years away, this means that the source determined to release the photon to your eyeball 300 years before you were even born! This is Irrational Time, and in Irrational Time everything that ever was, is, or ever will be exists simultaneously. This is how a photon from a star 300 light years away can determine to find your eyeball in an instant 300 years before you were even born. The unifying co-ordinate in the universe is irrational time. It is the commonality of all existence and provides the unity for all existence. This makes compelling arguments for both Retro-Causation(the future affecting the past) as well as a profound argument for Free-Will! The basis of this result is Einstein's Relativity Theory, and it is over a hundred years old by now...so catch up to it and equal the expansion of thought FINALLY!

How can you suggest in good faith that irrational time is not the ultimate absolute co-ordinate in the universe? I think you need to re-examine your education if you are so threatened by the truth!

As an example, the basic definition and solution to the issue of cancer was defined by Otto Warburg 50 years ago. The solution is in his definition if a truly ingenuous mind was examining it. The current culture of science and medicine is indifferent and unaware of the solution because the solution is not their true motivation. If the intention of scientific and medical investigation is not correct , then it is nothing but a fraud. Social and economic factors are really the overriding ones determining the so called results. It is sad but this is TRUE!

Anti-particles are the enantiomorphic forms of baryonic matter.