Ihcisphysicist

Subconscious is our pre-instilled instinct that assures our cognitive survival. There is little that our consciousness can do to manipulate our subconscious where as in our unconscious state we perform all the task that our inner mind without our logic is capable of, only that our conscious mind is shut and we can but only retain glimpses or draw blank of the incident.

pssst... do you know that all those conclusion based on far off observation are all estimations and not concrete facts.

I think that cause I choose to. The same reason that there was no no one evidence to go against it.

For the last time I never said that it would be entirely different but think of this , in another solar system where the mass of the star would be lower or greater than earth but the radiations and the gravity of that star would also influence the space around its system thus due to that factor the planets revolving around it would also get influenced by it and their revolution and rotation would differ from the planets in our solar system. Thus the behavior of the entire system would not be as ours, hence there would be different laws for the matters to interact.

Just when I was missing the God of science ,"strange" shows right up my shit. Then I presume you don't know shit about astrophysics so jerk the f**k off. Dude go and get a therapy. You are so messed up because you have an issue about acknowledging anything that cometh your path.

Why is it so hard for you to accept that the law of physic is not constant elsewhere in the universe. Why does an ant fall 100 feet down without breaking a ball while a 20 feet fall breaks our bones!!! I guess you are aware that the times a star is bigger than our sun, do conclude what kind of star it would be or is. For instance as the times a star is bigger than our sun, there are dwarf star, pulsars, red giant etc. and because of their mass they all have distinct characteristic. Now when I mean planets bigger to our earth, I just don't mean any regular planet that is bigger than earth but a planet with it's distinct properties like mass, volume, dimensions, composition etc. because every slight distinction means comparatively similar maybe, but different product.

The complete space physics theory. 1) Earth is an absolute magnet as a whole: The earth does have two magnetic poles that act opposite to each other but it is this proposition that balances the magnetic field of the earth as a whole. Thus the effect of gravity that matters perceive is but the central attraction force of the entity, hence gravity waves is but proportional pull of the earth via the balancing out of the two opposite force. (Something about the physics of the entire universe is that usually two opposite force of equal potential energy exist along with an intermediary to balance the construct of space and matters.) 2) Nature of the laws of physics: It is perhaps the most important but ignored aspect whenever an observation is concluded which is that the law of physics is not constant. The nature of space inside the earth that enables us to define our current laws can never ever be applied with the space around two galaxies. Of course this doesn’t mean that they don’t relate which they do but in a different manner based on the perspective of the mass and volume of the matters and the amount of disturbance of other matters that would affect it’s environment. 3) Why does the earth (planets) revolve around the sun? Since as mentioned the earth is a complete or total magnet in it’s self, space which is spread with radiations and magnetic waves that flows and bends from a point to other thus the central attraction force of the earth which is a combination of the two opposite magnetic force, repels the magnetic waves of space and so this repulsion causes the earth to rotate and revolve in a respective position. It can also be mentioned that a heavier mass matters (planets) would have a more circular or definitive orbit. As in the case of Pluto which is comparatively smaller than earth has more elliptical orbit than to that of Earth’s. Planets bigger than earth would have more stable or definitive orbit and if a planet or any matter is just too big for the star to influence in a solar system then it would not be a part of that system and would rather be a member of the higher system like the galaxies and would concur with the laws of that system. 4) Conclusion It can be said that a star holds a solar system which means the space around the star with the focal force stronger at it closeness would incur with the laws that it influences. The rays and force of the sun thus takes a toll on the matters under its reach. But as we move further away from the sun, the arrangement of physics laws with space by it’s force would no longer influence the supposedly another race of humans that dwell on far off planet as they would perceive in another set of environment where the laws of physics would not necessarily be as ours because it is influenced by the nature of the space around it in another side of the universe. And Much More...

Dude our time differs for an active discussion. When you are fresh and awake it's probably the time for me to hit the sack and vice versa.

For those who can put himself in someone's shoe and making the understanding choice rather than tit for tat. For me i.e.

Am reading "His Limbo Paradox" or aka "advertisement".

Worth every bit

Yeah Yeah wtv. You can keep the crab's head as a trophy.

Now everything makes sense. It's just another older male trying to dominate the world and the young...

Yes that exactly. It's tough to mention such...

It's about a man who has a shipwreck and ends up in a land of tiny people to whom he is a giant, written by Jonathan Swift. Maybe such place do exist because we can't be sure if the Pygmies are the tiniest of people.