Ihcisphysicist

What about it, can't there be some freak occurrences or simply accumulation/ over lodge of salt in any region other than the places where we are accustomed with.

This would be my last one to you I promise. If you have read thoroughly the entire spectrum of science then I admit that my intelligence is inferior to your's and all I speak is crap as much as you would want to have it. But if even you are well educated in some discipline then I guess its time for me to say go s*** your own s*** cause I don't give a S*** about your "Studied and done science", cause I've done myself some science too.

It is very much eminent, that a simple idea could get complicated but eventually no matter how complicated it may be, we have always found a way to solve it or to deal with it. . You think of science as something absolute and finite but i feel pity for people with such mentality because when the music stops and the real truth about everything will unveil one by one, at that time those ones hopelessly dependent on a system would idk what's gonna happen to them.

I don't know if you are aware of this or not but science was never instilled when humans decided to walk on earth but it was because of the creativity and intuition of certain individuals that dreamed and thought alike for which the average peers might have out cast him from the group but it is only because of such far fetch ideas about reality it has become possible for everyone to live and salvage the best of this generation. Are you absolutely sure that what your field of expertise covers is everything there ever is?

What you said is not far from the truth but still every big theories and concept evolved from a simple idea. Proving it wrong is one thing but undermining every new ideas and concept is just not cool. It's so like those science institution in the 1800s in some countries.

But what for some persons could be thinking outside the box could be at the very core of someone else's box.

I don't think we need to worry about the balance of salt any time soon or for at least thousands of zillion years because all the salt that is being dumped in the ocean comes from earth itself so at no point it will be toxic for earth or its inhabitants. Secondly, the more salt is passed down in on the ocean the cycle but continues and some more of it is trapped under the earth's crust away from water bodies or water line.

I thought that this was a speculation forum where people could discuss certain subjects and concepts that could still be at its infancy however as we get other people's insight and perspective, we are able to develop more ideas on the concept but sadly even in this trash bin forum, when a topic gets beyond the understandable norms of present science it is pinned down. Where else can we discuss on things and concepts from the farthest perspective of our brain.

How can you simply show me some super nerdy mathematics that does not have any real base and then claim that everything is worthless just because I didn't do some drawings and charts.

Then I guess antimatter or annihilation are just phenomenon that occurs when a matter is reacting to another force via the presence of space pockets.

All in good time.

Yes of course when the fuel burns, the energy and the residue would be left up and and what you say "annihilation" simply means the conversion of fuel to energy and residue. So that's that but you speak of antimatter as a black hole like entity that sucks matter or energy or whatever you mean to oblivion.

It does not entirely influence the behavior of a matter as the condition and other forces also do come to play in the movement of a matter. There are some ideas to test this but since it is still on the process to be implemented.

I don't think that such phenomenon takes place just the way it is. You are getting it wrong. I don't mean to say that the tiniest space particle builds up the universe but rather the space pockets holds and binds every form of matter in a universe.

I've already stated this in my other topic and am still speculating how this really makes sense. Thus a universe is finite and beyond the edge of a universe there will be no space pockets to contain matter until the next lump of space viz a viz another universe.

The final matter could explain so much in the universe, the center and the edges of the universe, multiverse, space travel (not via worm hole) etc. The fact that space itself is a form of matter could mean that the universe is not infinite and since time is a sense of perception via and inside space pockets only thus a universe is limited to the extent of these giant molecule of space pockets. The aftermath of one universe or outside the edges of space pockets would be an entity where there would be no matters and complete void with no sense of time perception until the next giant molecule of another space pockets where in another universe dwell.

And can you really base the theories given the condition that the scientists weren't there as the black hole was sucking voids of space. Nothing is 100.00% accurate if you really had the means to check it in physics. Not necessarily math is required as it is in its initial stage but you saying pointless makes everything pointless I guess.

Realm could either denote a metaphorical alternate universe where the laws of physics would either be inexplicit or simpler but nevertheless different from ours as for in this case realm means a specific part of universe, bigger or smaller from a human’s perspective. As of now since the concept is still in its initial stage so I can’t present the math behind it, perhaps someday. Let’s for example say, in the edge of a black hole, the way the particles would move or behave and the forces and pressure operating around it would surely defy the laws of physics that applies under earth’s environment and conditions which is reasonable I presume. (Realm could also denote a world for where a group or diversity of matters or consciousnesses perceive in close to each other’s perception time continuum thus in a particular part of space since the time sense of perception of matters differ with size and mass, there exist different section of realms in a given space with accordance to the time sense in perception). A simple example is that the subatomic realm and the micro realm exist around us without us being not able to feel or sense it or better yet, the existence of human does little bother a neutron star imploding if it had a form of consciousness of its own. As for the laws of physics that would contradict or differ from a realm to another is that for instance the model of an atom is represented by neutron and protons at the centre and electrons revolving the nucleus which is not so different as in the case of our solar system but since the mass and size of matters do influence its behavior with another force hence the structure and pattern and the laws of physical interaction will differ respectively. Finally the pressure of the gravity acting on the structure of the space pocket would also influence the conditions of the matters and how they interact thus a simple difference between the forces of gravity of planets would also mean different laws of physics. The laws of physics do evolve but not as in a ‘day’s time’ but to understand this from our perspective it will take probably eons of time or less to witness the change if we ever can. Supposedly a heavy star at the pitfall of its end, the pressure and force around the energy will begin to shift or change and just before it implodes the current law that enabled to hold it together will breakdown and as it does, the matters in it would behave in a panic mode and as the position and points of pressure shifts, a new kind of contract between the matters to interact or repel with each other will establish itself as matters don’t just disintegrate to oblivion. They say that the dark matter is omnipresent and ever exists because something that represents or defines nothingness is only rational but what if instead of the dark matter which is mysterious in nature, another entity which is the final structure of space, like sacs of tiny threads like platforms where everything that is something lies.

The observation beyond space. The final matter (Structure of space pockets) The 21st century universe of science is remarkable, the advances in technology and understanding of the physical matters has but only broaden towards more definite cutting edge analysis. But since the inception of complex theories and phenomenal laws of physics during the few hundred years, science has really broaden wide but even the geniuses in different decades and eras have missed to conclude the beginning and end, the tiniest and the largest of the universe from various perspectives. Although I have to say that in between the anatomy of the first and last i.e. in the middle exist the current laws of 21st century’s science and it is remarkable that science have come this far so drastically even though the rest of human kind denies to acknowledge science whilst thriving in the luxuries marveled by the brainchild of science. The way the universe works is quantifiable because a very significant form of physics exists in every realm that could contradict from a realm to another as the laws of physics do evolve as the matters evolve in time from a single perspective. The Science that exists now has failed miserably to rationalize the biggest questions of the universe because studies regarding the micro and macro universe are beyond human’s perception with the availability of hard facts and instrument s limited. I do believe that science can achieve many groundbreaking discoveries if we start understanding the very matters that build our universe and supposedly the purpose of our existence if any. (Because the behavior of the final matter could help solve the missing link in the chain about the machinery of the universe) The final matter (Structure of space pockets) In order to understand the behavior of the universe we have to understand what makes the matters in different voids of space and here on earth in different environments, influence the behavior of different matters respectively. Since it is eminent the existence of the tiniest matter in space instead of perceiving an endless loop in a subatomic realm, hence the tiniest particles be it the string particles or the ‘God particles’ or any other nano particles do suspend or lie on another entity i.e. space. Having stated the obvious and nothing new above, the other question is whether we may have been wrong about time, matter and space all along. What if the inter-relationship of the three may not be as the way we thought it to be? What if the three entity are not distinct concepts but fairly close. Since the concept about the existence of the tiniest matter is dynamic and mildly irrational in concluding, there is another case that could understand the entirety of physics and beyond, which is the final matter. The final particle is not necessarily the tiniest particle or matter, it is the final structure that binds the space around the whole universe. The final matter is space itself but not the great wide that expands but the space in its very structure which is far down beyond subatomic realm. In short space itself is a matter but not as in the three general states of matter or even the fourth. It could possibly be in another state and form but nevertheless the chains in the structure of space pockets interlinks flexibly throughout the edges of our universe and it is this pocket wherein lies various matters. We can understand the existence of space pockets by relating it with various phenomena that science has explained in different circumstances. Gravity do influence space pockets and it is only when gravity or a force acts on it, it contracts or expand that impacts all the matters inside it and in turn the effect on the space pockets affects the behavior of the matters in given conditions respectively. When we think about the gravity of the earth sucking any matter down to the ground it does contract space not in the worst way of course but only as much as it has to and it is this condition that has favored sustenance of life on earth. When gravity contracts the space pockets, most of the matters also get dragged along the ripple and crease of the pocket which is why even air is limited in higher altitudes and abundant in lower areas where the pocket is more focused and concentrated. Thus the gravity of an object could influence the conditions around it not directly but because of the intermediary which is flexible not only in physique but also in the way it interacts with the behavior of different matters of different natures in different conditions. Without the influence of earth’s gravity as in the case of outer space, it could seem to be empty and null but different forces radiates in and around space from different realms at different points. And in different planet or celestial body, since the force of gravity would differ from earth’s, the pressure acting on the pockets would be different thus sustaining different conditions than that of earth’s. (to be continued)

Or rather instead of generalising the concept, do you think you have a purpose or you want to make your life meaningfull instead of just going with the flow. The fact is such kind of questions comes ultimately down to each individual's own remark because no one can live your life but just you alone.

A multiverse would appear as a bubble in a multi times multiverse therefore our universe would seem as if it actually never exist from that point of observation since not even the brightest of the scientist/minds could provide us with a blueprint instead of their assumptions, it could be said that "everything which exist is 'nothingness' and 'nothingness' is existence".

I'll brief you with accordance to your doubts your point (1) ofcourse everything is being manipulated/controlled by the brain but the concept is based upon which part of the mind for eg, conscious, subconscious, unconscious etc has greater influencd upon us. (2) yes indeed subconcious consists and exercises most of the capability of our brain/mind but the important thing is upto what extent does it influence an individual's mind as a whole. (3) well its actually not " how much is 'required' for the functioning of our conscious mind but rather 'if there is then what determines our consciouness".

surely we can't say that we are absolute when it comes to the utilisation of the complete potential of our brain let alone but , we can't say for sure that we possess total control over the behaviour of our physical self. Even when we are walking or working, eating, playing etc the only authority we had was to put the thought of doing such in our mind and the rest was our brain doing everything from twicthing of our eyebrows to exerting the muscles and clinching of our jaw. I bet that no one could keep track of every movement of our muscles,hands , legs etc which all seems to behave beyond our conscious grasp and act autonomously only that they are also being dictated by the rest of our brain which is not our conscious self.

what makes you think we use our brain to our hearts content.