Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just wondering, i thought it was in a post somewhere but i cant find it :/

 

If you travelled at the speed of light for ten minute somewhere or over the speed of light, then came back, what would be the effect on time in earth? Does traveling at that speed do anything with time, like make it go back or forward ?

Posted
Originally posted by cHIs-

Just wondering, i thought it was in a post somewhere but i cant find it :/

 

If you travelled at the speed of light for ten minute somewhere or over the speed of light, then came back, what would be the effect on time in earth? Does traveling at that speed do anything with time, like make it go back or forward ?

 

 

As you move toward the speed of light, time in your frame of reference slows down in comparison to earth's time in its frame of reference. So if you were to take a 4 year trip (in your frame of reference) at 90% the speed of light in your spacecraft, about 9 years would have pasted on earth during your trip. At 10 minutes in your spacecraft (again in your frame of reference) at 99.99% the speed of light (approx. the closest speed objects with mass can go), about 50000 minutes passed. I might have screwed up the math folks...please check it.

Posted

ok, thanks, hmm so if they did find away to at least travel near c it woudlent be all that great on the trip back, the earth would of ages but not you. If thats right.

So wait, you are basicly traveling forward in time , so earth would be waiting years for your return, so it would be a quick way to see the future, and the whole idea of traveling at light speed isnt all that great considering earth would be waiting years for your return... kinda sucks :confused:

Posted
Originally posted by cHIs-

ok, thanks, hmm so if they did find away to at least travel near c it woudlent be all that great on the trip back, the earth would of ages but not you. If thats right.

So wait, you are basicly traveling forward in time , so earth would be waiting years for your return, so it would be a quick way to see the future, and the whole idea of traveling at light speed isnt all that great considering earth would be waiting years for your return... kinda sucks :confused:

 

Right. Basically travelling foward in time.

Posted
Originally posted by cHIs-

ok, thanks, hmm so if they did find away to at least travel near c it woudlent be all that great on the trip back, the earth would of ages but not you. If thats right.

So wait, you are basicly traveling forward in time , so earth would be waiting years for your return, so it would be a quick way to see the future, and the whole idea of traveling at light speed isnt all that great considering earth would be waiting years for your return... kinda sucks :confused:

 

the issue in this matter is more to do with general relativity rather than special. at some point you have to accelerate towards the earth, that is when you age less than it does. the SR stuff is not really important in this case (twins paradox)

Posted
Originally posted by Radical Edward

the issue in this matter is more to do with general relativity rather than special. at some point you have to accelerate towards the earth, that is when you age less than it does. the SR stuff is not really important in this case (twins paradox)

 

Why isn't special relativity involved? I thought special relativity dealt with velocity, and general relativity dealt with gravity..

Posted

SR only works in "special" cases (hence the name) which is with a rest frame. GR is what you actually apply to the universe since we don't have a rest frame.

Posted
Originally posted by blike

Why isn't special relativity involved? I thought special relativity dealt with velocity, and general relativity dealt with gravity..

 

well look at it relativistically:

 

ignore the earth and all gravity for the moment. You get in your spaceship and fly away from your twin at very high speed, watching him age more slowly than you. but he also watches you fly away at a very high speed, and he sees you ageing more slowly then him. so he turns round, and comes back, seeing the same thing happen again. oh no you think, what happens when he gets home: I am older than him, but he is also older than me! where has everything gone wrong? well the only difference between the two situations (relativistically) is that he had to accelerate to that speed, and accelerate back towards you, and then decelerate (still acceleration really, just in the opposite direction). during these periods, the twin who doesn't accelerate sees time pass more slowly for the other brother, the other brother sees time flying by for his accelerating twin, and the issue is resolved.

Posted

ok, im tryng to make sense of what you said, im sure you said it clear enough, im just slow and getting things :rolleyes:

Posted

General relativity is not required to understand the twin paradox. While it has been correctly noted that the difference between the two twins is that one of them accelerated, Special Relativity is perfectly capable of dealing with accelerations. This should make sense, because if you have a 4-velocity vu and take the time derivative of it, you get the 4-acceleration. Simply taking this derivative does not change the metric from flat to curved, so we are still working with SR.

 

Here is a document that shows how to deal with accelerated frames, and the twin paradox is specifically treated:

 

http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/gr-qc/0006095

 

Tom

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.