Bluenoise Posted May 13, 2005 Posted May 13, 2005 Well seeing as how ribosomes contain RNA, RNA came first.
hyebeh Posted May 13, 2005 Posted May 13, 2005 yeah... RNA is theorized to be the first molecule capable of storing genetic data.
dsjgenius Posted May 15, 2005 Posted May 15, 2005 i guess RNA but the more important question here should be did rRNA come first or was it another type of RNA or ribosomes
uncool Posted May 15, 2005 Posted May 15, 2005 RNA is able to synthesize itself, so it does not need the ribosomes. Also, there is RNA in prokaryotic organisms, which don't have ribosomes, so the RNA must have come first. -Uncool-
rakuenso Posted May 15, 2005 Author Posted May 15, 2005 RNA is able to synthesize itself' date=' so it does not need the ribosomes.-Uncool-[/quote'] mind elaborating?
Ophiolite Posted May 15, 2005 Posted May 15, 2005 Just thinking out loud: RNA probably preceded DNA, functioning as a self replicating system. When (and however)DNA came on the scene , the RNA was coerced into its various current roles, including facilitating protein synthethis in ribosomes. The ribosomes would look pretty silly w/out DNA, so I vote for RNA first.
donkey Posted May 17, 2005 Posted May 17, 2005 mind elaborating? I think he's talking about the RNA world hypothesis. Basically the theory suggests that RNA - which is known to have some catalytic activity as well as, of course, genetic storage capabilities - was the precursor molecule at the origin of life. It has been suggested that RNA molecules could use itself as a template and catalyse the duplication of itself. Then DNA and proteins came along and took over the storage and catalytic roles of RNA, religating it to a messenger and a few other niche roles. see here for details: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RNA_world_hypothesis
aaronmyung Posted May 18, 2005 Posted May 18, 2005 I have no idea what you are talking about, but it sounds ultra interesting. I'm off to study it now Hopefully I can come back soon and say something constructive
Skye Posted May 18, 2005 Posted May 18, 2005 Also, there is RNA in prokaryotic organisms, which don't have ribosomes, so the RNA must have come first. Prokaryotes have ribosomes.
aaronmyung Posted May 18, 2005 Posted May 18, 2005 I second what Skye said, as if you wouldn't know that Prokaryotes have ribosomes.
Skye Posted May 18, 2005 Posted May 18, 2005 There's no need to be smug though, everyone makes mistakes.
aaronmyung Posted May 18, 2005 Posted May 18, 2005 I was kidding buddy I dont know anything about this lol Read sig mate, I'm 16
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now