ModernArtist25 Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 (edited) Some don't believe so because her values and what she stands for, a lot of women don't agree with. What do you all think? Is Hillary Clinton a representation of a woman? Edited November 26, 2016 by ModernArtist25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Function Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 What is this? An introduction to "Biblical Nonsense for Dummies"? I'm not going to argue on biological sex vs. gender identity anymore. Every person who has a female gender identity is a good representation of a woman. Stop generalizing over stereotypes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prometheus Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 Who are these people and what is wrong with them? If a woman doesn't conform to your ideas about what a woman should be perhaps you should consider that your ideas are wrong rather than the woman. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ModernArtist25 Posted November 26, 2016 Author Share Posted November 26, 2016 (edited) Have you all heard of Teal Swan, she's one of those people who mentioned that Hillary is not a "representation of a woman." Check this out: I like Teal but found what she said about Hillary a bit odd because to me Hillary is an ambitious, strong, and intelligent woman. Edited November 26, 2016 by ModernArtist25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Function Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 Who are these people and what is wrong with them? If a woman doesn't conform to your ideas about what a woman should be perhaps you should consider that your ideas are wrong rather than the woman. +1 Have you all heard of Teal Swan, she's one of those people who mentioned that Hillary is not a good "representation of a woman." Check this out: I like Teal but found what she said about Hillary a bit odd because to me Hillary is an ambitious, strong, and intelligent woman. And no I haven't heard of Teal Swan, and if that's what she says, then perhaps I don't even want to hear of Teal Swan (ever again). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 Some don't believe so... Well, they are plainly wrong. Since they are wrong about something as obvious as this you probably shouldn't trust their opinion on anything else should you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imatfaal Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 1. It is a little odd to change the title without acknowledgement once multiple members have commented. 2. Even with the revised title - no, she is not a representation of a woman; she is a woman. The OP is either using an incorrect word in error or is perpetrating a sort of reverse ceci n'est pas un pipe 3. If the OP meant is she a (good) representative for women - then there is a question to be debated. I am not sure that she is, or that she should be. She was running for president as a fine politician, with huge experience of government, and a strong power base of committed supporters; that she is a woman is/was another reason to vote for her. But, most importantly, she was running to represent all of America. 4. I have googled Teal Swan - and I almost wished I had stayed ignorant. Teal Swan is an internationally recognized spiritual leader and an influential new voice in the field of metaphysics. She was born with a range of extrasensory abilities including clairvoyance, clairsentience, and clairaudience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringJunky Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 (edited) 4. I have googled Teal Swan - and I almost wished I had stayed ignorant. So you had to share it with us. Thanks. Yes, some things are best left unknown. Sometimes you could just nut the table... Edited November 26, 2016 by StringJunky 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 1. It is a little odd to change the title without acknowledgement once multiple members have commented. ! Moderator Note Sorry, that was me, and in response to the multiple comments. The title's original wording was not representative of the OP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringJunky Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 (edited) I think the title would have been more appropriate for Margaret Thatcher if she were the subject. She seemed to assume some masculine elements in her professional persona. Edited November 27, 2016 by StringJunky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now