swansont Posted December 4, 2016 Posted December 4, 2016 Does the Wave phenomena of an unmeasured free particle match anything on the Electromagnetic Radiation Spectrum? Too vague. What, specifically, is supposed to match? Can they have the same wavelength? Is that what you're asking? (Yes, and trivially so, since the range is infinite)
pittsburghjoe Posted December 4, 2016 Author Posted December 4, 2016 If a free particle can match something on the spectrum ..perhaps it could be a clue to Wave phenomena. I know you will castrate me for this but ..maybe the free particle is in something like how string theory describes.
swansont Posted December 4, 2016 Posted December 4, 2016 If a free particle can match something on the spectrum ..perhaps it could be a clue to Wave phenomena. I know you will castrate me for this but ..maybe the free particle is in something like how string theory describes. You need to learn some of the physics involved. Not the buzzwords, and not pop-sci descriptions.
pittsburghjoe Posted December 6, 2016 Author Posted December 6, 2016 An Optical Frequency Comb doesn't think the idea is so dumb. -1
swansont Posted December 6, 2016 Posted December 6, 2016 An Optical Frequency Comb doesn't think the idea is so dumb. What is this supposed to mean?
pittsburghjoe Posted December 11, 2016 Author Posted December 11, 2016 (edited) I think I stumbled onto the answer for Quantum weirdness and It's going to make you furious. Like it or not, the double slit experiment seems to demonstrate that our physical world grows from each of our consciousnesses. One study has shown that the on/off switch for consciousnesses may reside in or around the Claustrum in the brain. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22329762-700-consciousness-on-off-switch-discovered-deep-in-brain/ It is this area of the brain that I purpose we first search for particles in superposition/entangled states. If we were to find such a thing, it could prove that our consciousnesses is being sent to our brains via entanglement. All quantum weirdness would then have a reason for being the way it is ..it's necessary in order for lifeforms to have a conscious. Edited December 11, 2016 by pittsburghjoe
Mordred Posted December 11, 2016 Posted December 11, 2016 (edited) I hate to break this to you. However this has nothing to do with superposition collapse in the two slit experiment. This is a completely different entity altogether. Ie conciosness involving neural activity. Might I recommend paying less attention to buzz words and focus on the what an experiment actually tests for? Edited December 11, 2016 by Mordred 1
swansont Posted December 11, 2016 Posted December 11, 2016 All quantum weirdness would then have a reason for being the way it is ..it's necessary in order for lifeforms to have a conscious. Quantum weirdness was around long before conscious beings were around.
pittsburghjoe Posted December 11, 2016 Author Posted December 11, 2016 something planned ahead of time -1
Mordred Posted December 12, 2016 Posted December 12, 2016 (edited) nope, try again. Edited December 12, 2016 by Mordred
Phi for All Posted December 12, 2016 Posted December 12, 2016 ! Moderator Note This thread moved away from Quantum Theory to take up residence in the slums of Intelligent Design. If you start another thread with a hidden religious agenda to waste everyone's time with, you'll be suspended, pittsburghjoe. We're a science forum.
Recommended Posts