The Bobster Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 Are Jews privileged in academia? Is there any indication of nepotism in college admissions? Does ethnic bias ever influence science? How do we establish ethnic bias in science? Finding cases of academic fraud and correlating them to ethnicity would be one way. Are there any examples of Jews doing this? If so, is it a conspiracy? Some data to get the ball rolling.
The Bobster Posted December 20, 2016 Author Posted December 20, 2016 Source? http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy
Prometheus Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 Isn't this the exact same data as in the white privilege in academia? If so wouldn't it make sense to merge the two threads and consider ethnic (or whatever variable you want to explore) privilege in academia?
The Bobster Posted December 20, 2016 Author Posted December 20, 2016 (edited) Isn't this the exact same data as in the white privilege in academia? If so wouldn't it make sense to merge the two threads and consider ethnic (or whatever variable you want to explore) privilege in academia? I was informed by a mod that a thread on "White privilege" would be OK after criticising Jews. Kind of odd I know. Then I thought, if criticising Whites is OK, why not Jews? Kind of back to square one. And when looking for data on White privilege, I found massive Jewish privilege. Spooky stuff. Edited December 20, 2016 by The Bobster
Sensei Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 Are Jews privileged in academia? Jews were learning Torah (Bible), while typical Europeans were complete analphabetics thousand(s) years ago.. There was no even local European languages established at that time. They have in habit to learn, seeking for knowledge, since their young age. Is there any indication of nepotism in college admissions? No. Rather money.. Smart people invest money, and as a result earn even more money, gather money, not spend on stupidities, for centuries of their family.. Children, smart children, double it. Generation by generation. Add to it, having to pay for university, tremendous amount of money in US and UK learning system, and you have privileged group of rich people who pay for studies of their children, and very little quantity of poor people who receive it for free, but must be astonishing/desperate clever to get scholarship. Does ethnic bias ever influence science? No. Rather money.. People who had money could afford going to university to learn. So poor people were (and still are) typically excluded from knowledge, and don't participate in the new discoveries. Poor people try to survive a day, or week, or month, to the next payday.. Poor people rarely think about science. Finding cases of academic fraud and correlating them to ethnicity would be one way. Are there any examples of Jews doing this? No. If so, is it a conspiracy? Yes. Somebody who play roulette and constantly losing will also think it's conspiracy.. While croupier does not have to do absolutely nothing for people to lost the all their money..
Prometheus Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 We don't need to restrict attention to whites or jews, just define the variable of interest which seems to be ethnicity. I was informed by a mod that a thread on "White privilege" would be OK after criticising Jews. Kind of odd I know. Then I thought, if criticising Whites is OK, why not Jews? Kind of back to square one. And when looking for data on White privilege, I found massive Jewish privilege. Spooky stuff. We don't need to restrict attention to whites or jews, just define the variable of interest which seems to be ethnicity.
The Bobster Posted December 20, 2016 Author Posted December 20, 2016 (edited) We don't need to restrict attention to whites or jews, just define the variable of interest which seems to be ethnicity. We don't need to restrict attention to whites or jews, just define the variable of interest which seems to be ethnicity. I see. We don't hear this about White privilege though? Why can't we restrict attention to specific ethnicities? Jews were learning Torah (Bible), while typical Europeans were complete analphabetics thousand(s) years ago.. There was no even local European languages established at that time. They have in habit to learn, seeking for knowledge, since their young age. No. Rather money.. Smart people invest money, and as a result earn even more money, gather money, not spend on stupidities, for centuries of their family.. Children, smart children, double it. Generation by generation. Add to it, having to pay for university, tremendous amount of money in US and UK learning system, and you have privileged group of rich people who pay for studies of their children, and very little quantity of poor people who receive it for free, but must be astonishing/desperate clever to get scholarship. No. Rather money.. People who had money could afford going to university to learn. So poor people were (and still are) typically excluded from knowledge, and don't participate in the new discoveries. Poor people try to survive a day, or week, or month, to the next payday.. Poor people rarely think about science. No. Yes. Somebody who play roulette and constantly losing will also think it's conspiracy.. While croupier does not have to do absolutely nothing for people to lost the all their money.. Thank you for posting a relevant hypothesis. You think Jewish money is the main factor? Interesting, I'll look into it. You also think Jews are more literate due to their history. Entirely possible. Do you view this as cultural, genetic or both? And you'll find modern Marxist anthropology is nothing but a series of frauds. Edited December 20, 2016 by The Bobster
Prometheus Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 I see. We don't hear this about White privilege though? Why can't we restrict attention to specific ethnicities? It's just a strange way of doing science, don't you think? You have a hypothesis that ethnicity affects university enrolment, but then immediately seek to restrict the dependent variable. Aren't you also interested how it varies over all ethnicities and explore what other variables might be having an effect? A lot of the things we are discussing in one thread will likely appear in the other thread - why not keep them in one place - at the very least it will mean i don't have to post everything i write twice to satisfy your idea of equality between the two.
swansont Posted December 20, 2016 Posted December 20, 2016 I was informed by a mod that a thread on "White privilege" would be OK after criticising Jews. ! Moderator Note I said could be OK. But I've commented on your thread regarding why it isn't. It is not in keeping with the rules. Neither is this one.
Recommended Posts