new theory: 4th dimension time AND space and the difference time IN space

[Tahir Gorgen]

Philosophical: time is an measurmentstool of us to set the past, live the moment and to organize the future.

 

I know Einsteins aimings and what he did to prove his theory. He sended an atom clock with an plane and aimed that time on the surface will slow to opposite to the atom clock that is in an plane with HIGH SPEED.

 

Back in 2014 I was a bit hyper. And had the thougth of all. The planets etc etc and was brainstorming about speed etc. I know more about time because I experienced a lot. When we brainstorm so mutch and fast time seems not to pass as usual. It seems slower.

 

This is my theory and I know I'm rigth because I discovered mutch more with this:

 

Time IN space is the experience for organism of the moment that passes. Speed is related to the experience of time. We all experience real time (and space) so also speed, mutch more slower. Due to our place inside our atmosphere. It's also neuroscience. Call it evolution (no need to be hyper/useless energy use) or the Creators purpose.

 

Birds for example experiences the moment that passes, even slower than us. That's why we could'nt understand why they didn't bumb at high speed. (They focus more)

 

The Gravitational force of the sun for example. In real (time AND space) the rotationspeed is mutch faster than we see/think, so it pulls itsels and all towards to it.

 

We can predict so mutch because.. I will give an example. Think of an bullet we shoot away. We play it in slowmotion and watch this in 1 year. The first minute we can predict where it shoud hit over 1 year.

 

Time in space was quantumlogic. Quantumlogic= stuf our brain logically can't understand or see/be aware of.

 

Ps: can't react till 04:46. I will share another theorys of mine if I may. Coriolis. Climate Change.

[DrKrettin]

Birds for example experiences the moment that passes, even slower than us. That's why we could'nt understand why they didn't bumb at high speed. (They focus more)

 

 

 

I give up here - what does the verb "to bumb" mean?

[Sriman Dutta]

 

 

Birds for example experiences the moment that passes, even slower than us. That's why we could'nt understand why they didn't bumb at high speed. (They focus more)

 

Well, I see that you are using the time dilation concept; but that doesn't work well with the situation you have given. The world's fastest birds can fly at speeds not more than 320 km/h (I'm talking about the peregrine falcon). So, now the Lorentz factor becomes: sqrt(1-(320)^2/(300000)^2). That is extremely small and does not give extra time to the birds to focus.

[Tahir Gorgen]

I give up here - what does the verb "to bumb" mean?

 

My Dutch background. Grow up in Holland.

 

They do'nt hit eatch other at high speed.

 

And want to share a thougth of mine. There is no resistance in space. I some one can't understand how the speed in space of an comet for example could be x factor more. It approaches the sun and from it's heat/ligth, it warms up and sweats and leaves a dust. The ligth reflects (tale part) on the dust of it.

[DrKrettin]

The world's fastest birds can fly at speeds not more than 320 km/h (I'm talking about the peregrine falcon).

 

I think the fastest birds are the dead ones fired by a pneumatic cannon to test aircraft engines, but your argument still holds.

[Sriman Dutta]

No friction in space because there's no matter in space (even if present, only in very less density).

But, there's a resistance caused due to gravity----To escape the gravitational pull of a celestial object, you need to lose a bit of your energy.

[Sensei]

 

Well, I see that you are using the time dilation concept; but that doesn't work well with the situation you have given. The world's fastest birds can fly at speeds not more than 320 km/h (I'm talking about the peregrine falcon). So, now the Lorentz factor becomes: sqrt(1-(320)^2/(300000)^2). That is extremely small and does not give extra time to the birds to focus.

 

Lorentz factor is:

[math]\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}[/math]

 

Additionally, you made mistake with units.

320 km/h you have to convert to meters per second, that's unit used for velocity.

320 km/h = 320000 m/h (/divide by 3600) = 88.89 m/s

Then such velocity you can use in the proper above Lorentz Factor equation..

 

[math]\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{88.89^2}{299792458^2}}}[/math]

Edited December 23, 2016 by Sensei

[Sriman Dutta]

Sorry, I was rather careless.

[Strange]

I know Einsteins aimings and what he did to prove his theory. He sended an atom clock with an plane and aimed that time on the surface will slow to opposite to the atom clock that is in an plane with HIGH SPEED.

 

 

Actually, it wasn't him. But the experiment confirmed his theory, anyway.

 

 

 

This is my theory and I know I'm rigth because I discovered mutch more with this:

 

So, not science then.

 

 

 

We can predict so mutch because.. I will give an example. Think of an bullet we shoot away. We play it in slowmotion and watch this in 1 year. The first minute we can predict where it shoud hit over 1 year.

 

You haven't predicted anything. There seems little reason to take your idea seriously.

[swansont]

Philosophical: time is an measurmentstool of us to set the past, live the moment and to organize the future.

 

I know Einsteins aimings and what he did to prove his theory. He sended an atom clock with an plane and aimed that time on the surface will slow to opposite to the atom clock that is in an plane with HIGH SPEED.

Einstein didn't do that experiment. It was Hafele and Keating, ca. 1971, a couple of decades after Einstein died.

 

I will share another theorys of mine

You haven't even shared one yet, so it's not possible to share another. This is barely at the level of "2 AM drunken dorm room train-of-consciousness" musings.

 

Can someone calculate/predict anything with what you've presented? No.

 

You need to adhere to our guidelines if you want this thread to remain open.

[imatfaal]

 

Lorentz factor is:

[math]\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}[/math]

 

Additionally, you made mistake with units.

320 km/h you have to convert to meters per second, that's unit used for velocity.

320 km/h = 320000 m/h (/divide by 3600) = 88.89 m/s

Then such velocity you can use in the proper above Lorentz Factor equation..

 

[math]\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{88.89^2}{299792458^2}}}[/math]

 

Just as an aside - as the Lorentz factor works on a ratio of velocities rather than an absolute value you can use any unit for velocity you like; but of course, you are completely correct, they must be the same units for v and for c

[Tahir Gorgen]

I thank all for their comments.. I can only react 5 times a day so a discussion I can't have.

 

Sriman Dutta,

 

Friction is also resistance. Gravity is a Force and not resistance. The pull. All that effect the force (the force because we are the force in water for example) is resistance.

 

I contacted earlier today the society for neuroscience, because this is also neuroscience. And asked them to read my theory on this forum.

 

I will not share my oppinion about time dillation because I do'nt know what it is but I do'nt think that a bird that fly's at high speed carries an clock and sees at the clock that the time on that clock has slowed because he has approached the speed of ligth. Lol

 

I will not explain coriolis then or climate change. I will open an topic. And ask the die hards to explain it. Because no body knows it and when I explain it easly all will undertand and make fun of me again, lol. I dare you all. Physics is also having lol and I readed the modarotars link. No need to get mad. A fine French gentlemen (Neil Degrasse Tyson) said once:'their no wild cows, in the wild'

Edited December 23, 2016 by Tahir Gorgen