Michael F. D. Posted May 22, 2003 Author Posted May 22, 2003 What about 1) ? This is an official accepted model of universe.
fafalone Posted May 22, 2003 Posted May 22, 2003 I have no idea what you're talking about. Either learn English better, or post in your native language and I'll translate it myself, since online translators would be alot more accurate.
Sayonara Posted May 22, 2003 Posted May 22, 2003 ROFL This is soooooo output from a babble generator.
greg1917 Posted May 22, 2003 Posted May 22, 2003 Maybe its already going through an online translator, hence the plethora of incomprehensible babble.
fafalone Posted May 22, 2003 Posted May 22, 2003 Nah, even online translators can't be that incoherent.
JaKiri Posted May 23, 2003 Posted May 23, 2003 Originally posted by fafalone But the derivative of a constant is zero... not 1 and we can't even know absolute entropy... only change in entropy. As I said, I didn't know what you were talking about.
Radical Edward Posted May 23, 2003 Posted May 23, 2003 Originally posted by fafalone No. A black hole is not at absolute zero. I don't think he is saying it is at absolute zero, I think he is saying it is an absolute zero... compared to say, other zeros that aren't absolute. not that this makes any more sense mind....
Michael F. D. Posted May 24, 2003 Author Posted May 24, 2003 Originally posted by fafalone I have no idea what you're talking about. Either learn English better, or post in your native language and I'll translate it myself, since online translators would be alot more accurate. To my great regret, you nothing have seen except my bad English. It is possible, after my explaining of TIME and the Time Cycles in particular, some incoherent places in my post, existing on your glance, will be eliminated. Thanks for your offer, fafalone. Perhaps your online translator will helps us to avoid the secondary problems.
Erador Posted August 24, 2003 Posted August 24, 2003 r u guys saying that a high school kid gets this more than u people? its simple, real infinty is when it keeps multiplying, illusory is when it seems to be but actually is doing nothin maybe i dont get it on second thought
bigjnorman Posted October 28, 2003 Posted October 28, 2003 Originally posted by fafalone The entropy of a system is expressed as a number, I think the key word here is "expressed"..... The derivative of "k log w" is certainly not zero, but is again, expressed as a number (who's derivative is zero) when it is instantiated I don't understand where your headed with the derivation of entropy anyways (maybe I should read the entire thread)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now