TakenItSeriously Posted January 1, 2017 Posted January 1, 2017 Imagine observers A & B are in uniform motion in freespace and seperated by 1 lightsecond which is d = 299,792,458 m But if we transmit a clock signal with a funtamental frequency of 300MHz for exactly 1 second: f = 300,000,000 Hz λ = 1.0m exactly another words, in 1 second we transmit 300,000,000 lightwaves so the speed of light tells us the wave front traveled a distance of: d = 299,792,458 m but the sum of the wavelengths add up to d = 300,000,000 m So either light is blueshifted at v=0 or 415,084 bits of information was destroyed. So what's wrong with this picture?
Strange Posted January 1, 2017 Posted January 1, 2017 But if we transmit a clock signal with a funtamental frequency of 300MHz for exactly 1 second: f = 300,000,000 Hz λ = 1.0m exactly The wavelength is not 1 metre. It is c / 300 MHz = 0.999308193 metres.
swansont Posted January 1, 2017 Posted January 1, 2017 Because we made a choice about the length of the meter and second (both at one point tied to details of the earth) some time ago, and have tried to preserve the choice in our non-artifact-based standards.
TakenItSeriously Posted January 1, 2017 Author Posted January 1, 2017 The wavelength is not 1 metre. It is c / 300 MHz = 0.999308193 metres.Got it, thanks. All the online wavelength calculators were showing 9 significant figures but I didn't notice that they had rounded off c = 300,000,000 m/s which was what threw me off.
Sensei Posted January 1, 2017 Posted January 1, 2017 So either light is blueshifted at v=0 or 415,084 bits of information was destroyed. So what's wrong with this picture? Transmission of information is completely different story. In the simplest technology, you can interpret lack of photons is bit 0, and presence of photons is 1. Then turn on/off LED, incandescent light, or other source of light, over and over again, as fast as you need. You can have clock ticking 1 GHz or 1 THz, and in each clock cycle, emitting photons for each 1 bit set, and not emitting photons for 0 bit. Energy, frequency or wavelength of these photons will have nothing to do with amount of data transmitted this way. Read also about AM, amplitude modulation, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amplitude_modulation and FM, frequency modulation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_modulation
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now