Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

What do you think, would it be possible to make a spray can that contains DNA samples from hundreds (or better, thousands) human individuals? Would such spray be any effective to mask an earlier presence of an individual in some room?

 

If it works, what would be legal concerns about manufacturing such spray cans? Should people volunteer to have their DNA sample canned? Would there be a health risk: is it possible to somehow sterilize those DNA samples?

Edited by Danijel Gorupec
Posted (edited)

What do you think, would it be possible to make a spray can that contains DNA samples from hundreds (or better, thousands) human individuals? Would such spray be any effective to mask an earlier presence of an individual in some room?

 

If it works, what would be legal concerns about manufacturing such spray cans? Should people volunteer to have their DNA sample canned? Would there be a health risk: is it possible to somehow sterilize those DNA samples?

Why ask a question that may solicit or conceal criminal acts?

Edited by StringJunky
Posted

Why ask a question that may solicit or conceal criminal acts?

I was thinking the same... but I came with the idea in about 10 seconds. Everyone could do this. Can you of think anything to counteract this?

Posted (edited)

I was thinking the same... but I came with the idea in about 10 seconds. Everyone could do this. Can you of think anything to counteract this?

I suppose the decoy could be differentiated chemically by the chemical profile of it's carrier medium; you have to mix the DNA in something.

 

If it were a commercial product, it would have a known chemical/DNA profile and foresensics could then subtract that profile from what they have.

Edited by StringJunky
Posted

Why ask a question that may solicit or conceal criminal acts?

 

Wanting privacy from an intrusive state apparatus should not be prevented merely because criminals may also desire it. That's the old "only the guilty have something to hide" argument against making privacy / secrecy the default setting. In the UK we already live in a genetic surveillance society which would not be tolerated in any other free democracy. I wish to subvert the diminishment of the private sphere at every possible opportunity

 

And with regards to the OP - mini-vacuum cleaner on the seats of a bus or train, in a cinema, or pub; the dust bag is now your multiple dna sample

Posted

 

Wanting privacy from an intrusive state apparatus should not be prevented merely because criminals may also desire it. That's the old "only the guilty have something to hide" argument against making privacy / secrecy the default setting. In the UK we already live in a genetic surveillance society which would not be tolerated in any other free democracy. I wish to subvert the diminishment of the private sphere at every possible opportunity

 

And with regards to the OP - mini-vacuum cleaner on the seats of a bus or train, in a cinema, or pub; the dust bag is now your multiple dna sample

OK, that's another can of worms to be considered.

Posted

 

And with regards to the OP - mini-vacuum cleaner on the seats of a bus or train, in a cinema, or pub; the dust bag is now your multiple dna sample

So, you say it is even simpler than I thought.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.